1.7 RR why havn't the ........
#8
Originally posted by madwolf
You ran a 12.1 @ 127 with a 1.7 60' and 438 RWHP??
You ran a 12.1 @ 127 with a 1.7 60' and 438 RWHP??
Track location: long beach, CA (now closed)
1/4mi: 12.18 @ 127MPH
1/8mi: 6.4@ 89MPH
0 to 60: 1.47sec
R/T: .8sec
alt: <30feet above sealevel
(EDIT)last time i ran was when i lived in LosAngeles
any one know of any good 1/4 mile tracks in San Diego??
)when i ran i had no idea how much RWHP, had 1.6roller rockers - maybe worth a few HP)
Last edited by chad_g69; 12-07-2003 at 04:14 PM.
#11
double check your timeslip man, your 1/8 mile et and mph, doesnt match your 1/4 et and mph....something doesnt add up
just as a comparison my 1/8 is 8.1 at 89mph and my 1/4 mile was 12.5 at 115
1/8 to 1/4 difference:
for you 5.78 seconds and gained 38mph
for me 4.4 seconds and gained 26mph.....
and we crossed the 1/8 mile at the same mph.....
jesse
just as a comparison my 1/8 is 8.1 at 89mph and my 1/4 mile was 12.5 at 115
1/8 to 1/4 difference:
for you 5.78 seconds and gained 38mph
for me 4.4 seconds and gained 26mph.....
and we crossed the 1/8 mile at the same mph.....
jesse
#13
back to the topic please. what are the advantages and disadvantages of running 1.7RR to 1.6 RR? maybe the disadvantages are too great, or by the time people want that much lift they just get a bigger cam. would 1.7RR do anything for stock motor/cam? would the valves still clear the pistons? Trey