LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

whats the fastest STOCK fbody LS1 time any has gotten?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 03:03 PM
  #1  
wayne97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 202
From: DE
whats the fastest STOCK fbody LS1 time any has gotten?

1/4 times ... I have heard of plenty of them getting into the 12's stock ...
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 03:45 PM
  #2  
darrens99formul's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 989
From: Rochester, NY
I saw a bone stock Z28 do 12.9 once. I'm sure someone has done better though but anything in the 12's is very rare for bone-stock that isn't a slp option ss or firehawk (they have an unfair advantage of catback and lid).

It was a 2002 M6 and obviously he knew how to drive. I think the record is closer to 12.5 but I have no idea if that is true or rumor. Average stock ls1's run 13.5 so hitting 12's is friggin awesome for no mods.

Beware of what some people consider stock. I had a guy tell me his ls1 was stock and I later found out it had lid, hooker aerochamber muffler and Nitto DR in the back. Not that those are huge power adders but still to be stock to me means just the way it was when it rolled out of the factory, tires and all.

Last edited by darrens99formul; Oct 29, 2003 at 03:51 PM.
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 03:52 PM
  #3  
wayne97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 202
From: DE
12.5 is crazy! I think I read about a bone stock Z doing 12.99, but thats the best I heard of.
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 04:00 PM
  #4  
darrens99formul's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 989
From: Rochester, NY
Originally posted by wayne97
12.5 is crazy! I think I read about a bone stock Z doing 12.99, but thats the best I heard of.
I know, my thought exactly. I don't believe that one myself. I think what I read was it was 12.67 or something like that but still that's too fast for stock. He might have had ET streets on the back and a cutout and claiming he was stock.

I saw a 12.9 pass so I know that is possible but it's rare, usually only done in a 01 or 02 with ls6 intake, M6 because stock autos with the weak stalls and gears have no chance of 12's IMO and one heck of a launch/shifting.

Still mid to low 13's is pretty awesome too. 12's are just a few bolt-ons and drag radials away for just about any ls1 out there.
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 04:09 PM
  #5  
wayne97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 202
From: DE
Yeah. When I say stock, I mean just like it sits on the showroom floor - no DR's no cutouts, nothing. It seems near impossible to get mid 12's with street tires in my opinion.
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 04:28 PM
  #6  
tailwindxr7's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 204
From: Stonington, CT.
Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords ran a Z28 to a 12.89 if I remember correctly.

(EDIT: And I think it was a '99, too. No LS6 intake.)
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 04:43 PM
  #7  
Mikie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 594
From: Belmont North Carolina.
I ran mine bone stock and it produced the following times in the sig. There were several Mustang guys there that basically called me a liar when I told them I was stock runnin 8.50s in the 1/8th.
I showed them all I could from... paper filter, silencer and lid still intact, muffler underneath stocker etc...
Then they looked in and saw the "H" on the shifter **** and they said... AhHa ! your not stock if you put a hurst shifter in it.
They wouldnt beleive that the car came with the Hurst package from the factory.
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 04:56 PM
  #8  
wayne97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 202
From: DE
how did we end up in a mustang magazine with our fastest run?
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 05:09 PM
  #9  
Mikie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 594
From: Belmont North Carolina.
Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords were there in English town along with GM High Tech. Both brought out thier comparison vehicles. The article says that the Camaro was overlooked and the Bullitt (sp?) was surrounded by everyone during the press interviews. Once the Bullitt made a 13.9 something pass all was ok with it, then Evan Smith jumped into the Camaro and rolled it into the 12s and all of a sudden the crowd shifted from the Stang to the Camaro.
The Stang guys were in awe and decided to run the story. Not to mention they are the sister publication to GMHTP.
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 05:11 PM
  #10  
lethal ls1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 62
From: Lake Mary
My bud Rick had a 2000 NBM a4 Z28 with a lid and cutout only that was pulling 12.90's constantly. Wish he still had it, it was a freak!!
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 05:27 PM
  #11  
WyClef's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 45
my friend has a 02 WS.6 stockl that runs 12.79
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 06:29 PM
  #12  
96SFLZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 681
From: Republic of Korea
Originally posted by tailwindxr7
Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords ran a Z28 to a 12.89 if I remember correctly.

(EDIT: And I think it was a '99, too. No LS6 intake.)

Originally posted by Mikie
Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords were there in English town along with GM High Tech. Both brought out thier comparison vehicles. The article says that the Camaro was overlooked and the Bullitt (sp?) was surrounded by everyone during the press interviews. Once the Bullitt made a 13.9 something pass all was ok with it, then Evan Smith jumped into the Camaro and rolled it into the 12s and all of a sudden the crowd shifted from the Stang to the Camaro.
The Stang guys were in awe and decided to run the story. Not to mention they are the sister publication to GMHTP.

These are two different cars. The first one was a '99 Z28 and Evan (pretty sure he was the one driving) did get it to go 12.89. The second was the red '01 SS and I know Smith was driving that one. Although the weather was bad (hot), he still managed to get the car down to a 12.94 I believe.

Both of those stories were in GMHTP...MM&FF might have published a little side-story in their mag but I guarantee they didn't dedicate a whole 4-5 pages to an F-body.

Also, no doubt Evan Smith is one helluva good driver but just remember that when they (magazines) test these cars, they've usually rented the track. That means that they've got awesome prep on every run...and they can let the cars cool down and just pull right up to the burnout box too.


That 12.89 run is quickest that I've ever heard of out of a bone stock LS1...at least the quickest one that I honestly have no doubts about.
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 08:44 PM
  #13  
ULTIMTEORANGESS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 737
From: eatontown nj united states
id like to know what that SS wouldve run under better conditions.MM@FF thought at least 2 tenths faster.man thats kickass.how bout a lighter fbody version?
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 09:02 PM
  #14  
edg1957's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 264
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
I run 12.97 with loudmouth and lid. I ran 13.2 bone stock, but it was in bad weather. I am happy with the car! I am putting in N2O now, hoping for an 11!

Ed
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 09:13 PM
  #15  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Originally posted by Mikie
They wouldnt beleive that the car came with the Hurst package from the factory.
Regardless, I don't consider a shifter a mod that is going to put a 13 second car into the 12's.............I understand you want tight shifts and all, but c'mon, it's not in the same category as intake/exhaust/slicks .................stupid 'Stang owners.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:51 PM.