LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

SLP Perfomance Pac

Old Aug 11, 2005 | 09:01 AM
  #1  
SpeedDemon02SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,059
From: NJ
SLP Perfomance Pac

Is it really possible to get 400 rwhp out of the SLP performance pac?

Includes:
Headers, Cats, Cat-back, lid, MAF, CAI, filter, programmer, 1:8 rocker arms, and smooth bellows.
Old Aug 11, 2005 | 10:27 AM
  #2  
PAGregSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 240
From: Danville,PA
Re: SLP Perfomance Pac

I don't see how. Do they really rate it at 400 rwhp or 400 fwhp?

BTW, SLP headers are some of the worst headers to install. Keep that in mind if you're thinking about installing them yourself.

Last edited by PAGregSS; Aug 11, 2005 at 10:33 AM.
Old Aug 11, 2005 | 11:10 AM
  #3  
SpeedDemon02SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,059
From: NJ
Re: SLP Perfomance Pac

I ment at the fly wheel...sorry.

I know SLP lt's are the hardest to install, but i have hear they are really good quality and performance though.
Old Aug 11, 2005 | 12:04 PM
  #4  
V8 Slayer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 792
From: Long Island, NY
Re: SLP Perfomance Pac

Originally Posted by SpeedDemon02SS
Is it really possible to get 400 rwhp out of the SLP performance pac?

Includes:
Headers, Cats, Cat-back, lid, MAF, CAI, filter, programmer, 1:8 rocker arms, and smooth bellows.
I think they also come with an Underdrive Pulley.
Old Aug 11, 2005 | 12:08 PM
  #5  
PAGregSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 240
From: Danville,PA
Re: SLP Perfomance Pac

Sure, I could see 400 fwhp. The 1.8s essentially increase the lift of the stock cam making it seem bigger. Couple that with the headers, intake mods, and a good tune, it should make 400 at the motor since most LS1s seem to be around 360 at the motor stock.
Old Aug 12, 2005 | 07:16 AM
  #6  
teke184's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 8,319
From: US 1 Mile Marker 52 in the Florida Keys
Re: SLP Perfomance Pac

headers and catback = 25hp
lid = 10
rockers = 10

all the other mods probably don't add up to much. the CAI doesn't do much, the maf could actually hurt you, as could the programmer (specially with this many mods), filter, bellows and pulley don't do much.

with a dyno tune you MIGHT see 350hp at the wheels...which comes out to 390-400 crank hp.

honestly...i think there are cheaper ways to make the money. considering alot of those parts are worthless for hp.

$50 for a bellow?
$200 for a maf?
$300 for a programmer?
$100 for a CAI

money better spent elsewhere
Old Aug 12, 2005 | 08:14 AM
  #7  
SpeedDemon02SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,059
From: NJ
Re: SLP Perfomance Pac

how could the MAF or programmer hurt?
Old Aug 12, 2005 | 09:00 AM
  #8  
teke184's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 8,319
From: US 1 Mile Marker 52 in the Florida Keys
Re: SLP Perfomance Pac

many guys on here have shown slower times after using the "performance tune" on handheld programmers. they just aren't optimized for modded cars. they work goood for shift points/firmness on autos, gear changes, etc...

but the A/F tuning...is ..well...****ty

for $250 you can get a MUCH MUCH better tune from www.madz28.com or www.pcmforless.com
or for $350-400 a dyno tune

and many guys have also shown loss of power from MAF upgrades. but it's kindda 50/50..some do some don't. has to do with leaning out (or is it richening up) your A/F...if it does it in your favor you gain, if it goes the wrong way it will hurt you. most dyno tuners don't like using them, what does that tell you?

not sure how much the "package" you were looking at costs...but here is my breakdown of a better choice:

flowtech or pacesetter headers, off road ypipe = $600
LM exhaust or Hooker = $300
SSRA and lid = $300
LS6 intake (if needed) = $350 (used plus cost of coolant tubes)
madz28 tune = $250

should be about 340rwhp, maybe a bit more depending on the car...which is 380-390 at the crank. and that is without the $700 or so cost of rockers. go buy a cam kit for that much and make 2x as much as the rockers.

Last edited by teke184; Aug 12, 2005 at 09:06 AM.
Old Aug 12, 2005 | 10:28 AM
  #9  
Greed4Speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,507
From: FTW, TX
Re: SLP Perfomance Pac

Originally Posted by teke184
and that is without the $700 or so cost of rockers. go buy a cam kit for that much and make 2x as much as the rockers.
Amen to that. If you shop well, for the price of JUST rockers you could get a cam etc and make 370+ RWHP. The slight gain in lift from 1.8 rockers = slight gain in HP usually. But the longer duration and lift of a cam is where the power lies.

I've also read a thread where people actually lost some power with the longer SLP rockers.

Do a search. SLP is not the best solution. The power pack is for people too lazy to research or too new to know better and too much $ on their hands.
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 04:48 PM
  #10  
SpeedDemon02SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,059
From: NJ
Re: SLP Perfomance Pac

I wasnt going to get the power pack. i was just curious.

however, i do have the programmer and larger MAF already, and i have shown an increase at the track.
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 08:38 PM
  #11  
Antz97ZNJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,223
From: Browns Mills, New Jersey
Re: SLP Perfomance Pac

It can easily hit 400 flywheel...remember ls1's are really around 350 hp stock...and slp's using that to its advantage as a sales pitch...There's cheaper options out there that will give you just as much if not more power
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 09:12 PM
  #12  
Derek_91's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 167
From: Binghamton, NY
Re: SLP Perfomance Pac

IM not trying to steal this thread but i have a quick question about 1.8:1 rockers. I was looking through my new summit magazine and saw Harland Sharp rockers for $389.95. Would it be worth it? And if i were to buy them, would i have to get or tune or could i run it on the stock ECM? Thanks For the help.
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 10:04 PM
  #13  
Greed4Speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,507
From: FTW, TX
Re: SLP Perfomance Pac

tune = optimized

Gains will be minimal for the price. Buy a cam. Better yet, buy a cam that has the lift and duration that you want instead of having to fork up an extra $400 to get it.
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 04:10 PM
  #14  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Re: SLP Perfomance Pac

Just a quick note -- "fwhp" is not flywheel horsepower. It's front wheel horsepower. If SLP has anything to give you 400 fwhp on an F-body, then I want it.

If you're talking about measured flywheel horsepower, the proper term is brake horsepower (bhp).

This article has a good description of bhp in the fifth paragraph.

Sorry to nitpick!

-Jake
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 12:12 AM
  #15  
Strahley's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 266
From: Manhattan, KS
Re: SLP Perfomance Pac

Originally Posted by JakeRobb
SLP has anything to give you 400 fwhp on an F-body, then I want it.
Screw that, the only thing I want my front wheels doing is to steer
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
G-BODYT56
Parts For Sale
6
Jan 14, 2022 11:14 PM
n2oblkz
Parts For Sale
4
Oct 12, 2015 01:53 AM
sahlomonic
Parts Wanted
0
Sep 22, 2015 03:13 PM
tommalcolm
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
2
Sep 11, 2015 03:39 PM
rideordie
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
1
Sep 7, 2015 08:22 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 PM.