SLP Dual/ Dual on 2000 SS with restrictor?
Re: SLP Dual/ Dual on 2000 SS with restrictor?
first you say this:
Then this:
You seem to contradict your own statements.
Originally Posted by AL SS590 M6
Well let's see. The exhaust pipe goes into the muffler on the right side so wouldn't it be normal for the tail pipe closest to the inlet, flow more exhaust out?
Originally Posted by AL SS590 M6
It's a shorter path from the I-pipe out the drivers tip than it is going in the I across the muffler and back to come out the passenger side.
Re: SLP Dual/ Dual on 2000 SS with restrictor?
Originally Posted by Kevin Jackson
first you say this:
Then this:
You seem to contradict your own statements.
Then this:
You seem to contradict your own statements.
The point was that the restriction is there to balance the exhaust flow so that when there is steam or any visible exhaust it'll look even like it has real duals on it.
The SLP dual dual is a very good muffler and you will not find any gain in taking this "restriction" out. All you will gain is when you stomp it you'll get a blast of exhaust out of the left and nearly nothing out of the right. And the car will be a little louder.
Just like the Borla. People have dynoed with each plate from the 3/4" to the wide open and found no gain.
Re: SLP Dual/ Dual on 2000 SS with restrictor?
I have no hopes of gaining any noticable power by doing this, but rather sound.
There is a noticable difference in the sound and volume of the exhaust. that is why they installed the ring in the first place, to reduce the exhaust volume to meet the federal regulations or what not, so by removing it, is just making it louder.
I see it like this: i paid $20 to have this removed and got a louder exhaust note which is what i wanted. that just saved me several hundred dollars i could have spent on a catback to do the same thing. Its not as loud as a borla or anything, but it has satisfied me.
There is a noticable difference in the sound and volume of the exhaust. that is why they installed the ring in the first place, to reduce the exhaust volume to meet the federal regulations or what not, so by removing it, is just making it louder.
I see it like this: i paid $20 to have this removed and got a louder exhaust note which is what i wanted. that just saved me several hundred dollars i could have spent on a catback to do the same thing. Its not as loud as a borla or anything, but it has satisfied me.
Re: SLP Dual/ Dual on 2000 SS with restrictor?
Originally Posted by Kevin Jackson
I have no hopes of gaining any noticable power by doing this, but rather sound.
There is a noticable difference in the sound and volume of the exhaust. that is why they installed the ring in the first place, to reduce the exhaust volume to meet the federal regulations or what not, so by removing it, is just making it louder.
I see it like this: i paid $20 to have this removed and got a louder exhaust note which is what i wanted. that just saved me several hundred dollars i could have spent on a catback to do the same thing. Its not as loud as a borla or anything, but it has satisfied me.
There is a noticable difference in the sound and volume of the exhaust. that is why they installed the ring in the first place, to reduce the exhaust volume to meet the federal regulations or what not, so by removing it, is just making it louder.
I see it like this: i paid $20 to have this removed and got a louder exhaust note which is what i wanted. that just saved me several hundred dollars i could have spent on a catback to do the same thing. Its not as loud as a borla or anything, but it has satisfied me.
Doesn't always happen.There's another cheap mod that you can do too. You can cut a hole in the i-pipe and in the right hand tail pipe (the 2 holes would be facing each other) and put a small pipe (3/4"-1") between the 2 letting some of the exhaust out the right hand tail pipe without going thru the muffler at all. This is a mod that was being done to LS1 f-bodies before all the catbacks were available.
Re: SLP Dual/ Dual on 2000 SS with restrictor?
Who keeps their factory exhaust anyway? You need larger pipes to make any kind of gain-- catbacks aren't just for sound.
Last edited by BirchMan98z; Oct 4, 2004 at 01:56 AM.
Re: SLP Dual/ Dual on 2000 SS with restrictor?
Originally Posted by BirchMan98z
Who keeps their factory exhaust anyway? You need larger pipes to make any kind of gain-- catbacks aren't just for sound.
Re: SLP Dual/ Dual on 2000 SS with restrictor?
Originally Posted by BirchMan98z
Who keeps their factory exhaust anyway? You need larger pipes to make any kind of gain-- catbacks aren't just for sound.
I don't. I believe that most gains form catbacks are in the muffler.
Now once you start modding heavily, different story.
Re: SLP Dual/ Dual on 2000 SS with restrictor?
Originally Posted by AL SS590 M6
You really think that there's a huge difference between a 2 3/4" mandrel bent stock pipe and a 3" aftermarket pipe on a stock or near stock motor?
I don't. I believe that most gains form catbacks are in the muffler.
Now once you start modding heavily, different story.
I don't. I believe that most gains form catbacks are in the muffler.
Now once you start modding heavily, different story.
Re: SLP Dual/ Dual on 2000 SS with restrictor?
Originally Posted by BirchMan98z
Yes, I do. I've seen the gains people have made just from switching out factory exhaust for a cat-back.
Re: SLP Dual/ Dual on 2000 SS with restrictor?
Originally Posted by Beast96Z
What he is saying is, is that the power is not in the piping its self, but more in the muffler. Basically stating that 2 stock cars, one with a SLP muffler and stock piping and the other with a SLP cat back, won't make any noticable diffrences between each other.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MichiganSkip
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
2
Jun 16, 2015 08:12 AM



