Ported L92 Heads #'s?
Ported L92 Heads #'s?
03-23-2007, 10:12 AM
#5
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Mishawaka, IN
Posts: 1,771
I wasn't planning on using them on an LS1, I just thought they would be a good bargain for a budget LS2 4xx buildup. So far I've seen several vendors offer ported versions, but they haven't been offering up any #'s on them. I would imagine the large volume runners would be acceptable on that.
03-23-2007, 10:20 AM
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stroudsburg, PA
Posts: 949
Originally Posted by Jason 98 TA
Guys here's the dyno sheet from the 418 l92 stroker complete with l92 heads & l76 intake!
This is the engine that made 640 flywheel horsepower a week or two ago. I'll try to post up the dyno figures for the engine dyno later today.
Here's the specs on the motor & car:
TSP 418cid L92 Stroker
4.080" Bore
4" Stroker
Precision Race Components 6.2l Heads
PRC Platinum Spring Kit
Texas Speed 251/259 Camshaft 110+3
ASP Underdrive Pulley
Stock 6.2l Intake w/ stock 6.2l injectors
1 3/4" Headers
Borla Catback
3.90 Gear 12 Bolt
The engine dyno tests were done with 1 7/8" headers. Unfortunately the customers car is running 1 3/4" headers, but the car still makes very good power. If memory serves me correctly the engine is just a little bit over 11:1. We dyno tested several different camshaft options on the dyno, but decided to leave this one in to see how she drives
Chassis Dyno Results:
This is the engine that made 640 flywheel horsepower a week or two ago. I'll try to post up the dyno figures for the engine dyno later today.
Here's the specs on the motor & car:
TSP 418cid L92 Stroker
4.080" Bore
4" Stroker
Precision Race Components 6.2l Heads
PRC Platinum Spring Kit
Texas Speed 251/259 Camshaft 110+3
ASP Underdrive Pulley
Stock 6.2l Intake w/ stock 6.2l injectors
1 3/4" Headers
Borla Catback
3.90 Gear 12 Bolt
The engine dyno tests were done with 1 7/8" headers. Unfortunately the customers car is running 1 3/4" headers, but the car still makes very good power. If memory serves me correctly the engine is just a little bit over 11:1. We dyno tested several different camshaft options on the dyno, but decided to leave this one in to see how she drives
Chassis Dyno Results:
Last edited by Zigroid; 03-23-2007 at 10:23 AM.
04-02-2007, 04:40 AM
#7
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 6
lookie here
those huge runners dont seem to have a problem producing kick *** low end torque, provided you don't have a huge *** cam like the above. this is the first build ive seen that can actually rev, though. Id rather go with the 242/250 cam they tested previously that made 630 on the engine dyno (gave up 10 hp) but made a ton more torque down low.
those huge runners dont seem to have a problem producing kick *** low end torque, provided you don't have a huge *** cam like the above. this is the first build ive seen that can actually rev, though. Id rather go with the 242/250 cam they tested previously that made 630 on the engine dyno (gave up 10 hp) but made a ton more torque down low.
04-02-2007, 08:46 AM
#8
Retired
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Inside Uranus
Posts: 3,167
I've seen 480-530 rwhp 90% of the time. It all depends on the combo. These heads like big cams as shown in the above dyno graph.
04-02-2007, 08:50 AM
#9
Retired
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Inside Uranus
Posts: 3,167
04-03-2007, 08:58 AM
#10
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Mishawaka, IN
Posts: 1,771
Looks like they're still trying to figure out what the best budget combination is.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
10-31-2016 11:09 AM
oldschool
Parts For Sale
16
02-09-2016 09:21 PM
Wilson
Car Audio and Electronics
0
07-21-2002 05:08 PM