Most powerful LS1 Cam?
Registered User
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,096
From: College Station,Texas/ Oklahoma City, OK
Do you want a dyno queen or a track proven setup???
Dyno queen:
G5, ANY MMS cam/setup
, MTI X1(so far since no real track records available)
Track Proven to kick a$$
GTP "PIG" cam
TR224
fastech F1
ANY split pattern from Thunder Racing
Again all of this is based on my opinion and what I see normally throughout any of the boards, plus my opinion is unbiased and I am not trying to sell you anybodies products...
Rick
ps. All of these cams will REALLY shine with a nice set of heads/LS1 edit
Dyno queen:
G5, ANY MMS cam/setup
, MTI X1(so far since no real track records available)Track Proven to kick a$$
GTP "PIG" cam
TR224
fastech F1
ANY split pattern from Thunder Racing
Again all of this is based on my opinion and what I see normally throughout any of the boards, plus my opinion is unbiased and I am not trying to sell you anybodies products...
Rick
ps. All of these cams will REALLY shine with a nice set of heads/LS1 edit
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 96
From: Lincoln, NE
I have seen posts about some cams on here claiming 380 RWHP from just the cam swap. That's a gain of upwards of 80 RWHP from a cam? That sounds unbelieveable to me. Are these all top end power cams, that are weaker on the low end? How do they affect daily driving? How's the idle?
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 81
From: PA
Jason99ta on LS1.com and LS1tech.com had all the boltons and the TR224 114 lsa and dynoed over 390 hp.Now I think he has heads also. Those are very good numbers and he went well into the 11's with just a cam and boltons.
------------------
2001 Camaro SS M6
11.901@115.82 1.71 60 ft.
342 hp 355 ft/lbs
Boltons running on DR's
1990 Eclipse GSX M5 stock for now
------------------
2001 Camaro SS M6
11.901@115.82 1.71 60 ft.
342 hp 355 ft/lbs
Boltons running on DR's
1990 Eclipse GSX M5 stock for now
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 96
From: Lincoln, NE
Think U Can - Are those Rear Wheel numbers, or Flywheel? Also, was that the A4 or the M6? And how was driveability affected? I would assume the M6 would be more driveable, because the A4 requires a high stall converter to launch like a manual.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 81
From: PA
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by MonteSS427:
Think U Can - Are those Rear Wheel numbers, or Flywheel? Also, was that the A4 or the M6? And how was driveability affected? I would assume the M6 would be more driveable, because the A4 requires a high stall converter to launch like a manual.</font>
Think U Can - Are those Rear Wheel numbers, or Flywheel? Also, was that the A4 or the M6? And how was driveability affected? I would assume the M6 would be more driveable, because the A4 requires a high stall converter to launch like a manual.</font>
------------------
2001 Camaro SS M6
11.901@115.82 1.71 60 ft.
342 hp 355 ft/lbs
Boltons running on DR's
1990 Eclipse GSX M5 stock for now
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
