ls1 ss/ta vs c5 ???s
Re: ls1 ss/ta vs c5 ???s
Originally Posted by Camaro Rick
oops. sorry.
may I ask how this occurs?
may I ask how this occurs?
I wish I had a more scientific answer than "it just does", but that is the extent of my explanation. The Vette IRS is known to soak up more hp than the fbody's 10 bolt. Quite often fbodies will out dyno Vettes, because of this. In general it seems that straight axles transfer more power to the the ground than their IRS counterparts.
Re: ls1 ss/ta vs c5 ???s
Originally Posted by RussStang
I wish I had a more scientific answer than "it just does", but that is the extent of my explanation. The Vette IRS is known to soak up more hp than the fbody's 10 bolt. Quite often fbodies will out dyno Vettes, because of this. In general it seems that straight axles transfer more power to the the ground than their IRS counterparts.
Re: ls1 ss/ta vs c5 ???s
Originally Posted by fly89gta
I've seen a completely bone stock C5(down to the paper filter) run 12.6x. Stock tires, stock everything(M6). It ended up breaking the known record for the being the fastest completely stock C5 out there.
You don't see an fbody doing that. I also don't see Fbody's consistently running in the 12's bone stock. Sure there are a few factory freaks out there but consistenty? Nope.
It's not just a "driver's race". The vette is faster, period.
You don't see an fbody doing that. I also don't see Fbody's consistently running in the 12's bone stock. Sure there are a few factory freaks out there but consistenty? Nope.
It's not just a "driver's race". The vette is faster, period.
Re: ls1 ss/ta vs c5 ???s
Originally Posted by fly89gta
I've seen a completely bone stock C5(down to the paper filter) run 12.6x. Stock tires, stock everything(M6). It ended up breaking the known record for the being the fastest completely stock C5 out there.
You don't see an fbody doing that. I also don't see Fbody's consistently running in the 12's bone stock. Sure there are a few factory freaks out there but consistenty? Nope.
It's not just a "driver's race". The vette is faster, period.
You don't see an fbody doing that. I also don't see Fbody's consistently running in the 12's bone stock. Sure there are a few factory freaks out there but consistenty? Nope.
It's not just a "driver's race". The vette is faster, period.
Re: ls1 ss/ta vs c5 ???s
Originally Posted by DrewSG
Average drivers will be a drivers race. Not everyone is superhuman and can run a stock C5 to a 12.6. Most C5s I see at the track tend to run low 13s, right in line with a good running f-body.
Re: ls1 ss/ta vs c5 ???s
Originally Posted by Greed4Speed
Hmmm...guess the C5's I've raced and beat when I was stock must have been trying to boost my self esteem by letting me win. 

In all fairness, there are alot of c5s out there, and there are alot of sucky c5 drivers out there. Alot of c5 drivers aren't guys that have cut their teeth beating the sh*t out of an fbody they might have had once; they are old guys that bought the car and feel that they are untouchable.
Re: ls1 ss/ta vs c5 ???s
Perfect!
Use one of my previous posts on here as an example...
I had a 3.8 camaro M5 for about two years before getting my SS. Using that time to learn how to handle the car, and slam the gears. Stepping into my car now wasn't too hard to adapt to.
My brother on the other hand, has only had his C5 for a year or so. with his only prior cars being automatic.
We pulled dead even the last time we raced and I know his car is a good 1/4 to 1/2 second faster than mine in the quarter mile.
or maybe I'm wrong. ehh. who cares.
Use one of my previous posts on here as an example...
I had a 3.8 camaro M5 for about two years before getting my SS. Using that time to learn how to handle the car, and slam the gears. Stepping into my car now wasn't too hard to adapt to.
My brother on the other hand, has only had his C5 for a year or so. with his only prior cars being automatic.
We pulled dead even the last time we raced and I know his car is a good 1/4 to 1/2 second faster than mine in the quarter mile.
or maybe I'm wrong. ehh. who cares.
Re: ls1 ss/ta vs c5 ???s
Originally Posted by RussStang
In all fairness, there are alot of c5s out there, and there are alot of sucky c5 drivers out there. Alot of c5 drivers aren't guys that have cut their teeth beating the sh*t out of an fbody they might have had once; they are old guys that bought the car and feel that they are untouchable.
It can go either way.
Re: ls1 ss/ta vs c5 ???s
Originally Posted by Greed4Speed
In all fairness, there are a lot of f-bodies out there and a lot of sucky drivers too. There are many f-body owners that have never owned a V8 or even a car before.
It can go either way.
It can go either way.Yeah, it most definety can, but you weren't talking about racing other fbodies. You were talking about racing c5s, so I brought up the point that there are alot of sh*tty c5 drivers out there.
Seeing how hard it is to find a used fbody in decent shape, I would bet that there is a higher percentage of fbody owners that drive their cars alot harder than c5 owners.
Re: ls1 ss/ta vs c5 ???s
Originally Posted by RussStang
Average drivers of exact equal skill and the win goes to the Vette. This is especially true on the highway, where one might pull up next to an fbody and go from a roll, completely negating any benefit the fbody might get from their advantage of an easier launch from the solid axle. . I don't see what is so hard to understand about this.
Re: ls1 ss/ta vs c5 ???s
From a roll... weight isn't a HUGE issue like it is from a launch. So advantages are pretty similar now. Advantage goes to Vette for Aerodynamics but who does roll racing 100-160 with Stock LS1s? Point goes to F Bodies
Re: ls1 ss/ta vs c5 ???s
this thread is from april 4th... That said, this is engine tech not who would win tech, or if the original question was "What should I buy, c5 or T/A, its still not engine tech.


