LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

Installing an LS1 in a 2002 Yukon Denaly

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2002 | 01:02 PM
  #1  
chevcamz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 7
From: tolland
Post Installing an LS1 in a 2002 Yukon Denaly

I picked up my 2002 Yukon last week and im currently installing a custom 10in lift, I also just picked up an LS1 crate engine and a Paxton supercharger which im going to be installing rite after I finish the lift. Does anyone know what changes I might need to do to get this done correctly?
Old May 13, 2002 | 06:25 PM
  #2  
phil1001's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 79
From: Little Falls, NY, USA
Post

doesnt the truck already have an ls1 in it, the only difference being the cast iron block, and intake manifold, and it is either a 4.8,5.3,or 6.0
Old May 13, 2002 | 06:43 PM
  #3  
ShadowLight's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 22
From: Elbert, CO
Post

Correct me if I am wrong here, but aside from being "LS1" heads what exactly would that leave?

I'm pretty sure that's a Vortec engine.

------------------
-Evan Bangs
1998 Trans Am - 5.7L V8, A4, 3.23s, SLP Loudmouth, Tinted Windows, Yellow Painted Calipers, Chameleon Blue-Green paint.

Pics of my cars, friends, etc.
Old May 13, 2002 | 06:50 PM
  #4  
BergerSS435's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 137
From: Mishawaka Indiana USA
Post

Don't the Denali's already have a 5.3L LS1 like version??
Old May 13, 2002 | 07:10 PM
  #5  
chevcamz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 7
From: tolland
Post

I guess you can call it an LS1 derived engine but its not the real thing. before I put the engine in im sending the heads out to be ported with larger valves and a good cam to complement the supercharger. I would like to make around 500hp at the motor and while the engine is out I might as do it rite. Im spending this much cash so what the hell is the difference.
Old May 13, 2002 | 07:22 PM
  #6  
BigDaddy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 225
From: Brockton, Ma,
Post

Are you a drug dealer, have a large trust fund, or just posting BS? Anyway, I'd think the cast iron block would be better, since you can bore it out. I'm not sure that Al block will last in a truck.
good luck.
Old May 13, 2002 | 07:30 PM
  #7  
ShadowLight's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 22
From: Elbert, CO
Post

While you are at it, you might want to upgrade the stock internals to handle the supercharger.

Maybe he's the world's greatest gigalo?
Old May 13, 2002 | 08:01 PM
  #8  
chevy qc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 250
From: michigan
Post

if your buying a true denali, it would have the 6.0 325hp in it. your way better off with that than an LS1. just bolt a magnacharger too it and be happy with it. 500hp isn't a problem with the 6.0 liter with more torque than a 5.7. btw for them calling it an LS1, it's not. LS1 is an rpo just as LQ4 is a 6.0 (except cadilac 6.0). LS1 is not a name for an engine. gen III is the term for this series to be correct.
Old May 14, 2002 | 09:08 AM
  #9  
chevcamz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 7
From: tolland
Post

No, Im not a drug dealer just an Honest hard working person asking an Honest question. For all you nosey people asking about my money.....I own a very established Concrete company that employs 45 people. I will have to check into that charger for my Yukon I wasnt aware that they make one for the truck. If that works out better I guess I will put the engine and the charger in my shop for my next project.
Old May 14, 2002 | 05:57 PM
  #10  
phil1001's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 79
From: Little Falls, NY, USA
Post

gen III smallblock is what i meant when i used the term LS1, anyway i would use the cast iron block, it will be way stronger, not to mention the added displacement from the 6.0
shadowlight-i was refering to the block as the same mold as the ls1, just made of castiron instead of aluminum.
Old May 14, 2002 | 11:51 PM
  #11  
XKnightRider's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 376
From: Chandler, AZ
Exclamation

Unless you have already purchased the unit I would steer away from Paxton. Get a good SC like a Vortech. And how much boost are you gonna run?
Old May 15, 2002 | 12:17 AM
  #12  
ShadowLight's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 22
From: Elbert, CO
Post

Yeah, I haven't heard any good things about Paxton...even from the 5.0 blower babies
Old May 16, 2002 | 12:14 AM
  #13  
chevy qc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 250
From: michigan
Post

the magnacharger is the kit lingenfelter uses in his 475hp suv/pickup 6.0 liter package. if it's good enough for him, i'd say it works fine.
Old May 17, 2002 | 11:13 AM
  #14  
Brian Wheeler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 12
From: KS
Post

Make sure to use the truck intake instead of the LS1. Supposedly they outflow even the LS6 intake! But they have a high profile so they won't fit under f body hoods.

Also, I'd sell that supercharger and have MTI motorsports in texas build you a 382 all bore motor. They use the stock crank and resleeve the block with bigger bores to obtain 382 cubes.

There latest 382 dynoed 480 rwhp through an M6! And the shortblock is only like $5,500. Basically the price of a supercharger without the wear and tear on your motor. Hell, or you could even do both!!!!

650 rwhp????

------------------
1999 Red Z28 M6

Hurst, Direct Flo Lid, 3 inch cutout, Flowmaster muffler

More mods on the way
Old May 17, 2002 | 02:25 PM
  #15  
chevcamz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 7
From: tolland
Post

Well I just picked up a Magnacharger for the truk and that will be going on next week after the lift is done. I guess I will save the LS1 and the charger for my street rod project to shorlty follow.

Thanks



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:13 PM.