Dyno Results
#18
Originally posted by Bone Maro
Some of you amaze me at your quickness to denounce a flywheel conversion.
I make 555 FWHP. How many other people do you run into who can claim they have a street driven, grocery getting, family hauling 550+ hp car?
Some of you amaze me at your quickness to denounce a flywheel conversion.
I make 555 FWHP. How many other people do you run into who can claim they have a street driven, grocery getting, family hauling 550+ hp car?
Nascar, NHRA, IHRA, and all of the others quote flywheel horsepower because they use engine dynos extensively and they KNOW what the flywheel numbers are.
I will NEVER post that I guess that according to this conversion number that my motor might be making around 350ish horsepower at the flywheel. I will post that it made 314 rwhp on a dynojet.
My 2 cents.
#19
If you wanna get specific about accuracy, then your Dynojet numbers are inaccurate. The program uses a drum and some algorithims to guess on torque, then again guesses on horsepower. The only "true" dyno numbers, or at least more accurate, is a Mustang dyno because of the rotation of inertial mass against a known applied force. Thus, why Mustang dynos usually dyno lower than Dynojets and the like, they're a "true" chassis dyno.
So, I guess unless we're all pulling our engines and putting them on engine dynos, we're all screwed because no one knows the "true" power that we put out.
Or in my case, I tell people that know cars what my rwhp is. I tell other people who are just being nice or passing by at a car show what my fwhp is. That way, there's no confusion between the automotive masses and the regular masses.
But, this is stupid. If you don't like conversion numbers, then you don't. If you do, then you do. No one's right or wrong for converting if they feel the desire.
So, I guess unless we're all pulling our engines and putting them on engine dynos, we're all screwed because no one knows the "true" power that we put out.
Or in my case, I tell people that know cars what my rwhp is. I tell other people who are just being nice or passing by at a car show what my fwhp is. That way, there's no confusion between the automotive masses and the regular masses.
But, this is stupid. If you don't like conversion numbers, then you don't. If you do, then you do. No one's right or wrong for converting if they feel the desire.
#20
Originally posted by Bone Maro
Or in my case, I tell people that know cars what my rwhp is. I tell other people who are just being nice or passing by at a car show what my fwhp is. That way, there's no confusion between the automotive masses and the regular masses.
Or in my case, I tell people that know cars what my rwhp is. I tell other people who are just being nice or passing by at a car show what my fwhp is. That way, there's no confusion between the automotive masses and the regular masses.
#23
how come everytime i post about...anything an arguemnt is started. i just wanted to see how my #'s were and istart some d@mn arguement. don't post on my tead unless your going to help or have a positive comment. i mus have some sorta curse
#24
I did post the norm about what your power is to the flywheel, and the conversion factors the average owner uses.
Some people decided to hijack your thread becasue they feel your numbers don't count at the flywheel or you're "bench racing".
You asked, and some of us gave you the input you'd requested. Sorry if it got away from the original topic
Some people decided to hijack your thread becasue they feel your numbers don't count at the flywheel or you're "bench racing".
You asked, and some of us gave you the input you'd requested. Sorry if it got away from the original topic
#25
they keep saying that our f-bodies are equivalent to the c5 of its perspective year. Chevy just downsizes the numbers so as to keep them from taking sales away from the vette. 299.2 is impressive for the mods you have done .
I hear you about the conversion numbers too. I live in NY and the new craze is all these lil rice burners. These kids think what the hell they have b/c they take a civic and put on an exhaust and an intake. It gets to the point where it gets annoying. Then they start with the my intake gives me 25 horse and my ehaust another 15 so now I have 150 hp. they have no idea and gets really tiresome tryin to explain what the real numbers mean.
It is fun to let them make noise in front of you and then just fly right by them though
but anyway good luck with the car and congrats on the numbers
I hear you about the conversion numbers too. I live in NY and the new craze is all these lil rice burners. These kids think what the hell they have b/c they take a civic and put on an exhaust and an intake. It gets to the point where it gets annoying. Then they start with the my intake gives me 25 horse and my ehaust another 15 so now I have 150 hp. they have no idea and gets really tiresome tryin to explain what the real numbers mean.
It is fun to let them make noise in front of you and then just fly right by them though
but anyway good luck with the car and congrats on the numbers
#26
Originally posted by 98 PURPLEHAZE
so does anybody have insight on what i shoulddo next...i was thinking some sfc, lid, zo6 clutch and hydrolics, and hooker lts
so does anybody have insight on what i shoulddo next...i was thinking some sfc, lid, zo6 clutch and hydrolics, and hooker lts
SFC is good..
Lid is fine.. adds noise.. but power too..
hold off on clutch till you need one, then get the star spec 3 or something good like that..
hooker... hmmm everyone else has them.. why not...
its all a matter of what you want to do with your car and where you want to take it..
research before you buy!
good luck! sorry about your post going haywire! hehe
btw.. I am happy with my numbers.. when i one day get the mega bucks, I will for surely take my engine out and get it dynoed to have an idea of what the percentage loss is.. till then I dont care for speculation.. nice to know the engine power but only when you have had it on an engine dyno..
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tdigger9899
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
9
09-07-2015 10:56 AM