drove a 1998 vette, why does it acclerate diffent from my 99 Z28
drove a 1998 vette, why does it acclerate diffent from my 99 Z28
Test drove a 1998 vette, why does it seem to just have more accleration than my 1999 Z28. Is it the gearing or the rear end ratio?
There is minor HP and Torque difference, but in my opinion there has to be
something else, it was an A4 and when it hit second, the car jerked and
I got some wheel squeal.
There is minor HP and Torque difference, but in my opinion there has to be
something else, it was an A4 and when it hit second, the car jerked and
I got some wheel squeal.
Re: drove a 1998 vette, why does it acclerate diffent from my 99 Z28
little more hp, lighter and more aerodynamic
and the tranny shifting different is all in the programing of the computer.
also realize it probably had 18" tires, which is less sidewall so the grip could have been less than the big sidewall of a 16" tire.
and the tranny shifting different is all in the programing of the computer.
also realize it probably had 18" tires, which is less sidewall so the grip could have been less than the big sidewall of a 16" tire.
Re: drove a 1998 vette, why does it acclerate diffent from my 99 Z28
Originally Posted by AlmostfastLT1
I think the hp is 345, also it is lighter, etc. And there later after 99 it was up to 355.
99 z28 have 310?
99 z28 have 310?
Re: drove a 1998 vette, why does it acclerate diffent from my 99 Z28
and not many pre-01 cars dynoed that high...particularly autos.
they were usually putting out numbers closer to 290...yes still underrated but the vette still had the advantage.
they were usually putting out numbers closer to 290...yes still underrated but the vette still had the advantage.
Re: drove a 1998 vette, why does it acclerate diffent from my 99 Z28
Originally Posted by teke184
and not many pre-01 cars dynoed that high...particularly autos.
they were usually putting out numbers closer to 290...yes still underrated but the vette still had the advantage.
they were usually putting out numbers closer to 290...yes still underrated but the vette still had the advantage.
Yes, it's predominantly autos dynoing in the 290 range. I have seen a ton of 98-00 6 speeds in the 300-310 range.
Re: drove a 1998 vette, why does it acclerate diffent from my 99 Z28
The feeling of acceleration is heightened by the Vettes lower ride-height and lighter weight, but all things equal the Vette probably is only a hair quicker.
Re: drove a 1998 vette, why does it acclerate diffent from my 99 Z28
When I had my 2002 z28 and my dad had a 2003 C5 they would be very close i a race.
I noticed that the vette "felt" much faster when driving it. I think the main reason is that you can see the hood when you are in the driver seat (unlike my z28). When you floor it, you get a little bit of "squat" and you can see the hood come up. It gives the illusion of accelerating faster than you are. That is the only reason I could come up with for why it "felt" faster.
Dustin
I noticed that the vette "felt" much faster when driving it. I think the main reason is that you can see the hood when you are in the driver seat (unlike my z28). When you floor it, you get a little bit of "squat" and you can see the hood come up. It gives the illusion of accelerating faster than you are. That is the only reason I could come up with for why it "felt" faster.
Dustin
Re: drove a 1998 vette, why does it acclerate diffent from my 99 Z28
I never drove the newer style but there was a 98 6-speed for 15,000 with 80k miles. I was going to jump on it but it was sold this morning
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jb4xx
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
9
Feb 2, 2015 10:00 PM
Deadbolt24
LS1 Based Engine Tech
1
Jan 19, 2015 01:29 PM
hotrodyou1
Cars For Sale
1
Dec 20, 2014 10:05 PM




