DriveTrain loss, is this true??
DriveTrain loss, is this true??
If a 100 hp engine loses 15hp(15%) from the flywheel to the drivewheels. Will it still be a 15%(30hp) loss if the engine was pumping out 200 horses going through the same tranny????
So, will it be 185 hp or 170 hp at the wheels for a 200 hp engine??
thx
So, will it be 185 hp or 170 hp at the wheels for a 200 hp engine??
thx
that's about right. I am sure engineers have a more complicated/accurate formula, but typical losses for a manul tranny are around 15%, automatics beinging slightly higher. Needless to say, if you're dealing with a car making 300 horsepower or more, it is a significant loss...
Scott
Scott
I dynoed 248 stock, with a 94' vette 6 spd. All corvettes are dynoed before they leave the factory and are held back if they fail, for 94' they should all be 300 at the motor. So a simple calculation 248/300 = .826 or approximately a 17% loss due to the drive train. I think a 2% margin of error is reasonable, due to variances in the dyno equipment etc. Which would show a min of 15% loss and a high of 19% loss. I like the 17% myself
Conversely, if my 99 SS dynoes 325rwhp then it has 380 at the motor
Conversely, if my 99 SS dynoes 325rwhp then it has 380 at the motor
Originally posted by Btchslp
Conversely, if my 99 SS dynoes 325rwhp then it has 380 at the motor
Conversely, if my 99 SS dynoes 325rwhp then it has 380 at the motor
!! hehehCome on, you know you want to see it on the dyno... DO IT! DO IT! DO IT!
Then agian, looking at your sig.. YOU NEED TO DYNO AND VISIT A TRACK! MAKE A PILGRIMAGE IF NEEDED!
Originally posted by Btchslp
I dynoed 248 stock, with a 94' vette 6 spd. All corvettes are dynoed before they leave the factory and are held back if they fail, for 94' they should all be 300 at the motor. So a simple calculation 248/300 = .826 or approximately a 17% loss due to the drive train. I think a 2% margin of error is reasonable, due to variances in the dyno equipment etc. Which would show a min of 15% loss and a high of 19% loss. I like the 17% myself
Conversely, if my 99 SS dynoes 325rwhp then it has 380 at the motor
I dynoed 248 stock, with a 94' vette 6 spd. All corvettes are dynoed before they leave the factory and are held back if they fail, for 94' they should all be 300 at the motor. So a simple calculation 248/300 = .826 or approximately a 17% loss due to the drive train. I think a 2% margin of error is reasonable, due to variances in the dyno equipment etc. Which would show a min of 15% loss and a high of 19% loss. I like the 17% myself
Conversely, if my 99 SS dynoes 325rwhp then it has 380 at the motor
Yes, 496 would be the number it is a percentage of the total power. If you only had 100 hp at the motor you would have 83 hp at the wheels. You lose approximately 17hp per 100.
Clear.....?
Clear.....?
I just got this from Dynojet:
Doesnt that bite? hehe In any case it is good to just get an idea of the power and not an exact representation.
Thank you for your interest. Because there are so many variables that affect drive train loss Dynojet does not offer any type of formula or method of calculating engine vs rear (or front) wheel horsepower.
I would, but its 5 pages... not too bad info but I would argue it..
essentially at the part i have gotten to, they are saying that the drivetrain loss is at 12% now because cars more more efficient..
then they are argueing the difference of the mustang and dynojet numbers..
can you cut and paste to get to ls1.com?
essentially at the part i have gotten to, they are saying that the drivetrain loss is at 12% now because cars more more efficient..
then they are argueing the difference of the mustang and dynojet numbers..
can you cut and paste to get to ls1.com?
Last edited by psychocabbage; Sep 18, 2002 at 11:06 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RUENUF
Cars For Sale
6
Mar 13, 2016 03:37 PM
WobblySausage
LT1 Based Engine Tech
6
Oct 7, 2015 02:44 PM



