LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

Do M6 LS1's really burn oil like I've been hearing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-22-2003, 06:21 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
Capn Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Posts: 5,308
Originally posted by lastZ
i have a 2002 Z.....doesent burn a drop of oil, and i have a heavy foot more times than not the only problem i have is that damn piston slap
100% same here :

- '02 Z28
- no oil consumption
- heavy foot
- piston slap

Originally posted by Fishv12
So just to make that clear synthetic is NOT recommended on those engines ? I always used synthetic in my previous ride.
I believe that GM recommends NOT using synthetic oil in LS1's if you are suffering an oil consumption problem, but it seems contradictory considering they deliver Corvettes (for sure) with Mobil 1 synthetic already in them!? (I don't think anyone knows *officially* if ALL LS1's get Mobil 1? ).
Capn Pete is offline  
Old 10-22-2003, 07:29 PM
  #32  
Registered User
 
StormSigma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 132
Originally posted by Bluntdogg
My Low Oil light came on after about 2000 miles from the last change. Mine seems to burn a decent amount of oil, but then again I have been getting on it quite frequently since buying the car.
Good man. That's what I like to hear. I drive the same way.
StormSigma is offline  
Old 10-22-2003, 07:33 PM
  #33  
Registered User
 
SilvercamZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Seymour Johnson AFB, NC
Posts: 116
Mine also burns oil... about a QT every 2K or so... kind of ****'s me off but what are you going to do.... I took it into the Dealership when I first noticed the problem and they can't seem ti figure it out... and they won't put a new engine either.. I've tried.
SilvercamZ28 is offline  
Old 10-22-2003, 09:04 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
Fred94LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Staten Island, New York, USA
Posts: 179
It's not uncommon for high output engines back as far as the early 60's to burn some oil at high rpm's. In other words expect some oil lose... BTW mine doesn't or hasn't lost any yet either,lol
My 71(340) duster did and my 85 (302) GT Mustang & 88 LX (302) did. Usually after 60,000 miles.
Fred94LT1 is offline  
Old 10-23-2003, 12:05 AM
  #35  
DJD
Registered User
 
DJD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kamloops BC
Posts: 13
The SS did come with synthetic oil as factory fill. go here and look at SS performance package http://www.gmcanada.com/english/vehi...a_details.html

Last edited by DJD; 10-23-2003 at 12:11 AM.
DJD is offline  
Old 10-23-2003, 10:27 AM
  #36  
Registered User
 
Fishv12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 36
SS Performance Package - includes 325-hp 5.7 L LS1 V8 with forced air induction system, unique hood air intake, low restriction exhaust system, synthetic engine oil....
Fishv12 is offline  
Old 10-23-2003, 09:20 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
Capn Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Posts: 5,308
I almost can't believe they actually took the time to determine whether the LS1 being built was going into a Z28 or an SS before they put the oil in?! I think there would be too much likelyhood of mixing up!? Considering they already put synthetic into Corvette LS1's, what would the extra cost really have been to say "screw it" and put synthetic in ALL LS1's that were built?!??
Capn Pete is offline  
Old 10-23-2003, 11:08 PM
  #38  
Registered User
 
koolaid's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 5
The SS got the synthetic oil while it was at SLP. So, I would assume GM filled up the motor with fresh dino, put it on a truck, dropped it off at SLP, drained the dino, and filled it with Castrol.
koolaid is offline  
Old 10-28-2003, 07:02 AM
  #39  
Registered User
 
chuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Posts: 901
My '98 didn't use oil, well not under normal conditions. Flogging it on a road course would make it use a little.

My '01 uses a little, but nothing excessive.
chuck is offline  
Old 10-28-2003, 08:22 AM
  #40  
Registered User
 
z28chrizz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Latham, NY
Posts: 311
My Z is oil consumption free. First time I ran synthetic, I had the low oil light come on as it was time for an oil change. Now, I put in 6.5 qts in during the autocross season (extra oil gets trapped in the lifter valley and valve covers... so a little bit of extra protection never hurts) and right before I change the oil it still reads full. Which means in my 3k of hard driving, it burns that 1/2 qt which is well within the tolerance for any new engine.

Some thoughts... if you guys are using the larger M1 filter, are you adding extra oil to compensate? There is a somewhat significant increase in volume (8oz ish) between the M107 and M111 (?) I believe.

If you are letting the engine rev down hard ie, rev to 5500, then let the engine braking slow the car down to say 2500 rpm... you are fluttering the oil rings and naturally going to burn some oil. That is a common problem with all cars and sustained high decelrating revs. Only time I do that is when I am autocrossing the car... rest of the time as cool as it sounds I resist and shift to a higher gear and use my brakes.
z28chrizz is offline  
Old 10-28-2003, 12:42 PM
  #41  
Registered User
 
Carlos01SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Cypress, Orange County CA.
Posts: 382
Originally posted by z28chrizz
Some thoughts... if you guys are using the larger M1 filter, are you adding extra oil to compensate? There is a somewhat significant increase in volume (8oz ish) between the M107 and M111 (?) I believe.

I didn't know about the M111, that is a recommended oil filter as opposed to the Mobil1 M1-107???
Carlos01SS is offline  
Old 10-28-2003, 11:48 PM
  #42  
Registered User
 
z28chrizz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Latham, NY
Posts: 311
I had the number wrong... its the M1 206... larger filter, same threads and diameter as the M1-107. I think I got the 111 from somewhere else... for my jeep, or maybe my old stang??
z28chrizz is offline  
Old 10-29-2003, 07:00 AM
  #43  
Registered User
 
jasons93z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,613
I feel sorry for you guys with new cars that burn oil like crazy . I have a 94 z28 and it burns absolutly NO oil at all when i change the oil every 3k miles. It has 82k on it, and i go WOT quite a bit. Im not trying to brag, just saying that that sucks.
jasons93z is offline  
Old 10-29-2003, 10:32 AM
  #44  
Registered User
 
z28chrizz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Latham, NY
Posts: 311
Originally posted by jasons93z
I feel sorry for you guys with new cars that burn oil like crazy . I have a 94 z28 and it burns absolutly NO oil at all when i change the oil every 3k miles. It has 82k on it, and i go WOT quite a bit. Im not trying to brag, just saying that that sucks.
Nah, yours leaks out the intake, rear main, and all over your opti. j/k

I assure you all cars burn oil (especially upon startup), just some are more sensitive about it than others. It has a lot to do with the driver, the type of oil used (dino = not as easily burnt in the combustion chamber) , and a number of other factors.

It is true that GM probably should have stepped up the quality control, but there are other factors I dont know about with these engines... I would assume that they need a different amount of room (than a cast block) to allow the engine to expand upon startup since the aluminum/sleeve combo has very different thermal characteristics. I might even propose that this oil burning is almost always in startup, due to the nature of the metals in the motor. After all, this is one of the suggested sources/reasons for the piston slap issue as well.
I have never in my experience, seen a LS1 car (at the drags, or on the autocross course) with grey smoke coming out the tailpipes, suggesting that it is being burnt at high RPMs under load, (black yes... but thats fuel) like those 80's caravans we all see cruising around. Hadnt really given this much thought till now since my car doesnt seem to have this problem.
z28chrizz is offline  
Old 10-29-2003, 01:51 PM
  #45  
Registered User
 
DanBUCF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 659
I am pretty sure the problem only occurs in '01 and up LS1's. I had a pretty bad case of Oil consumption in my car. Brought it to the dealership to have a conusmption test done....1,000 miles later GM decided that they would replace the piston rings under warranty. Its only the 2nd ring that was the problem....It wasn't a tight enough fit, and when you downshift to slow down it would creat a vaccum that would suck oil past the ring. This is why the problem only really occurs in M6 cars. You can drive any car at high rpm's all day long ant it will use oil....thats just the nature of an engine. This specific Oil consumption problem associated with LS1 is because of the "faulty" piston rings. I belive they replaced mine with a chrome-molly ring that made a much better seal. I haven't noticed any oil consumption since then and its been about 14,000 miles since they did the work. I also drive the hell out of my car every day. It sees WOT at least 3-4 times a day and I always downshift because hearing my loudmouth just makes my day.
DanBUCF is offline  


Quick Reply: Do M6 LS1's really burn oil like I've been hearing?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05 AM.