LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

? about ls1 normal performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 08:18 AM
  #16  
GhostZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,326
From: Tulsa, OK
Re: ? about ls1 normal performance

Originally Posted by lil305gta
I see a few folks talking about cleaning the AF sensor? Will this hurt anything, i know they are very expensive lil pieces of equipment. What exactly do you clean when doing this?
When i cleaned my MAF i just used alcohol and a Qtip, and very very gentle pressure. Alcohol is what electronics circuit board manufacturers and repair companies use as well, it doesnt damage electronics
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 08:38 AM
  #17  
AL SS590 M6's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 1998
Posts: 6,247
From: Charlotte,MI USA
Re: ? about ls1 normal performance

Originally Posted by Hawk
wow this thread makes me feel good for the good ole LT1, I can liquidate my 315's in my LT1 in 1st, 2nd, and 3rd, no clutch dump required
And while you're liquidating you tires I'll be gone. The ability to spin your tires is bad not good.
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 09:26 AM
  #18  
Hawk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,319
From: Jackson, NJ, USA
Re: ? about ls1 normal performance

Originally Posted by AL SS590 M6
And while you're liquidating you tires I'll be gone. The ability to spin your tires is bad not good.

Still it's fun, I have the maro for tire smokin and the bike for racing
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 10:13 AM
  #19  
CamaroRob97's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 275
From: Goose Creek, SC
Re: ? about ls1 normal performance

Originally Posted by teke184
man i would never spend the money to have a shop do the plugs. they aren't that hard to get to, only the passenger rear 2.

save the money and do it yourself.

as for brands

ngk tr55 plugs $2 each
taylor spiro-pro wires $50


NOT trying to hi-jack this man's thread,OR challenge anyone here, but i am curious as to why the TR 55's are recomended as opposed to the TR 5's. From Thunder Racing's website the TR 5's have a .035 gap, which means less distance for the spark to travel, this a more powerful spark. Why (and i mean why as in i want to learn ) are the TR 55's so much more used as the have a larger gap @ .050?? Has it got something to do with a detonation issue??
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 04:31 PM
  #20  
Kraest's Avatar
Retired
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,166
From: Inside Uranus
Re: ? about ls1 normal performance

Originally Posted by CamaroRob97
NOT trying to hi-jack this man's thread,OR challenge anyone here, but i am curious as to why the TR 55's are recomended as opposed to the TR 5's. From Thunder Racing's website the TR 5's have a .035 gap, which means less distance for the spark to travel, this a more powerful spark. Why (and i mean why as in i want to learn ) are the TR 55's so much more used as the have a larger gap @ .050?? Has it got something to do with a detonation issue??
The TR55s come pregapped at .050".

The TR5s come pregapped at .035".

More gap = bigger spark = more mixture ignited at once = potentially more power.

LS1s and LT1s are designed to use about a .050" gap. With an MSD ignition setup, you can decrease the gap since the plug is being fired multiple times to ignite as much of the mixture as possible.
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 04:32 PM
  #21  
Kraest's Avatar
Retired
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,166
From: Inside Uranus
Re: ? about ls1 normal performance

Originally Posted by CamaroRob97
Has it got something to do with a detonation issue??
The more of a detonation issue, the smaller you want to make the gap. You use smaller gaps/colder plugs in supercharger/nitrous applications.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
captcorvette
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
2
Mar 7, 2015 12:37 PM
edman
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
5
Jan 22, 2015 02:45 PM
Caps94ZODG
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
22
Jul 30, 2002 08:45 AM
guionM
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
14
Jun 19, 2002 08:30 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:39 PM.