General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech For general F-Body discussion that does not fit in any other forum.
For F-Body Technical/Information Discussion ONLY

Spent 4 hours with a 01 WS6, disappionted

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2007, 05:42 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Red95M6Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 677
Spent 4 hours with a 01 WS6, disappionted

2001 WS6 Trans Am 6spd, all stock, 23,000 miles.

I am in no way bashing the LS1.....its a superior motor, but this car just seemed to feel sluggish in comparision to my LT1 94 Z28. I realize it would turn in a full second faster 1/4 mile time, so I am no lunatic LT1 worshiper.

Has anyone else felt this way?
Red95M6Z28 is offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 05:45 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
chuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Posts: 901
Yup, when I switched years ago I missed the snappy throttle response of the LT1. I wonder how much of that has to do with the twin smaller throttle plates on the LT1, and the big single plate on the LS1?

In first and second the LT1 feels quicker, but by the top of third I knew there was a difference.

Just curious, what is the asking price on that car?
chuck is offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 05:56 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Red95M6Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 677
Yeah thats true 4th gear was noticably stronger in this car. I dont know the asking price of the car. I was delivering it for a dealer friend of mine.

The car was very smooth, and much tighter than my old drop top 94. That kinda goes without saying though, 100k less miles, ttops instead of canvas top, etc.
Red95M6Z28 is offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 06:05 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
96ZCamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Topeka, KS
Posts: 474
I have driving a 00 WS6 trans am. And I was very happy with the whole performance aspect of it. It handled great, stoped great, and it definatly was not a slow machine either. I personaly would love to have one over the lt1. But I suppose to each their own.
96ZCamaro is offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 06:12 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
2000GTP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 12,312
It seems like this comes up here and there from LT1 owners, but the numbers between the two platforms speak for themselves.
2000GTP is offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 06:26 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Red95M6Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 677
Originally Posted by Red95M6Z28
I realize it would turn in a full second faster 1/4 mile time
.....................
Red95M6Z28 is offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 08:01 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Capn Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Posts: 5,308
I don't have a lot of seat time behind the wheel of an LT1, but I've never felt like anything is "missing" when I've driven them ..... until after ~3500 RPM, where they don't pull nearly as well as an LS1 .

That being said, this debate has come up so many times, and from people who own/drive both, that I think there has to be some merit to it. Even if it is simply the ~500 - 2000 RPM range that we're talking about, EVERYBODY seems to feel that LT1's have better low-end pull. I even have a few time-slips to prove that there isn't much difference between my LS1 or my friends' LT1s in the 60' range .

BUT, all that being said, try revving the LS1 out a little more, or dropping an extra gear, and crank that beast up a little ................ and hang on . Where the LT1 starts to fall flat on its nose from ~5000+, the LS1 is just getting warmed up .
Capn Pete is offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 09:38 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
fergymoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sharpsville, PA
Posts: 387
Top end... that's horsepower.
fergymoto is offline  
Old 03-25-2007, 06:52 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
MasterEvilAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 755
Heh, The only thing I don't like about the LS1 is the lack of low-rpm grunt. Feels nasty
MasterEvilAce is offline  
Old 03-25-2007, 07:18 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
fasteddie94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 609
Originally Posted by Capn Pete

That being said, this debate has come up so many times, and from people who own/drive both, that I think there has to be some merit to it. Even if it is simply the ~500 - 2000 RPM range that we're talking about, EVERYBODY seems to feel that LT1's have better low-end pull. I even have a few time-slips to prove that there isn't much difference between my LS1 or my friends' LT1s in the 60' range .
I own both and have raced both, and I completely agree here. It feels so slow down low, but that's all it is, just feel. 60 ft times are identical if not a little better for the LS1.
fasteddie94 is offline  
Old 03-26-2007, 03:43 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
wdtiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Anchorage, AK
Posts: 451
I think the LS1 just delivers the power so much more smoothly that the butt dyno gets fooled into thinking the LT1 has better low end torque.
wdtiger is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Formula Steve
LT1 Based Engine Tech
45
09-19-2023 08:31 AM
Nayr
LT1 Based Engine Tech
7
03-03-2023 08:34 PM
Stephen68
Appearance
3
10-16-2015 03:50 PM
damnyankee36
LS1 Based Engine Tech
5
09-09-2015 07:06 PM
Boss002
Autocross and Road Racing Technique
2
07-24-2015 10:47 AM



Quick Reply: Spent 4 hours with a 01 WS6, disappionted



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:44 PM.