General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech For general F-Body discussion that does not fit in any other forum.
For F-Body Technical/Information Discussion ONLY

Lt1 block different from normal 350 block?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2006 | 04:55 PM
  #1  
bombebomb's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,855
From: Ohio
Lt1 block different from normal 350 block?

I think I read somewhere that a lt1 350 block is different from a regular 350 block, my question is
Is there a difference and if so what is it?
Thanks
Old Dec 22, 2006 | 05:07 PM
  #2  
shoebox's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 27,725
From: Little Rock, AR
Yes, they are very different as far as water pump mounting and passages. If you look at the front of the block, it is very evident.
Old Dec 22, 2006 | 05:17 PM
  #3  
bombebomb's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,855
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by shoebox
Yes, they are very different as far as water pump mounting and passages. If you look at the front of the block, it is very evident.
Thank you, I wanted to double check.
Old Dec 22, 2006 | 10:19 PM
  #4  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Originally Posted by shoebox
Yes, they are very different as far as water pump mounting and passages. If you look at the front of the block, it is very evident.
I can't remember off hand, but I believe it's gear driven, correct?? (I mean the water pump). Also it's because of the reverse-cooling that required the changes in the passages, both through the block and the heads.

LT1's would also lack the rearward distributor hole I believe (since they have the Opti-spark mounted on the front of the engine ... would they then have a reluctor ring on the crank?? or do they use some other means of crank/cam sensor?? )
Old Dec 23, 2006 | 12:09 AM
  #5  
TraceZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,526
From: Madison, Wi
Originally Posted by Capn Pete
I can't remember off hand, but I believe it's gear driven, correct?? (I mean the water pump). Also it's because of the reverse-cooling that required the changes in the passages, both through the block and the heads.

LT1's would also lack the rearward distributor hole I believe (since they have the Opti-spark mounted on the front of the engine ... would they then have a reluctor ring on the crank?? or do they use some other means of crank/cam sensor?? )
The optispark distributor is driven directly off the front of the cam and it serves as the cam position sensor to drive the ignition. Later models did get a crank position sensor, but all it really did was assist in misfire detection for the OBDII. There is no distributor hole in the back of the LT1 intake manifold, but if you remove the manifold you can see the block still has provitions for the legacy distributor and GM uses a stub shaft to close up the hole and procvide a means to drive the oil pump. In fact, it is possible to run a conventional distributor in a LT1 if you make a hole in the intake manifold. Getting that to fit under the cowl of a f-body would not be fun, though.
Old Dec 23, 2006 | 02:06 AM
  #6  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
^ ^ interesting! Good info!
Old Dec 23, 2006 | 08:04 PM
  #7  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Good article, hilighting the differences, with photos:

http://www.automotiverebuilder.com/ar/ar99928.htm

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F'n1996Z28SS
Cars For Sale
8
Aug 23, 2023 11:19 PM
sskevinm
Parts For Sale
0
Dec 18, 2014 11:16 AM
routesixtysixer
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
2
Jun 23, 2002 02:29 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:04 PM.