General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech For general F-Body discussion that does not fit in any other forum.
For F-Body Technical/Information Discussion ONLY

losing weight...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 07:30 PM
  #1  
fasteddie94's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 609
From: Winchester, VA
losing weight...

I want to cut some weight from my fourth gen. How hard would it be to cut say 150 to 200 pounds?
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 07:45 PM
  #2  
LT1 POWR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,830
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Re: losing weight...

Are you wanting to take stuff out like carpet,spare,rear seats,and jack or replace things with lightweight material like brakes and front cross member.
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 07:48 PM
  #3  
LT1 POWR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,830
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Re: losing weight...

Like seen here.
http://www.thunderracing.com/catalog...&vid=4&pcid=42
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 07:50 PM
  #4  
myslowcamaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,326
From: fairless hills pa
Re: losing weight...

its more like how expensive and how crazy you want to go with it.
power window motors, new tubular control arms are good up to losing 20 lbs, cd player? radio? backseat, rear carpeting, spare tire and jack, washer fluid resovoir, smaller/lighter battery, lighter rims, carbon fiber parts replacement if applicable.

what i laugh at is people on the borderline of a good 1/4 mile time, do the weight reduction, then are told they need a roll bar/cage. add the weight back on.
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 09:58 PM
  #5  
fasteddie94's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 609
From: Winchester, VA
Re: losing weight...

Basically what's going on is I am putting together a low 12 combo now and plan to supercharge it after next season. So after the blower i'll need a cage but not until then. I know I'll lose stuff like the backseat anyhow and I'm redoing the interior so there's no sense in recovering that and then taking it out. I am more in the market for cheap weight reduction and not blowing a whole lot of money. Brake upgrade will be a must before long as well as the carpet as I am doing the interior. I want to keep stuff like the power windows cause it's not just a strip car.

All I have done now is the jack and spare, tubular lca's, and a tubular tq arm. Those weren't ment to save weight, even if they do, I had other reasons for that stuff.
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 10:17 PM
  #6  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Re: losing weight...

How far do you want to go......

Radio delete: http://cjcfo.fbody.com/members/injun.../DCP03456a.jpg

Sunvisor delete: http://cjcfo.fbody.com/members/injun.../DCP04160a.jpg

Old Oct 10, 2005 | 01:51 AM
  #7  
revtime's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,734
From: Kansas City suburb of
Re: losing weight...

So far my car is at 3220 with a full tank of gas.
I still have the stereo in it (soundstream angina amps and a stealthbox) and today I removed the front bumper support. I have KBDD subframes and a granatelli Gload brace on the car and a heavier BMR adjustable TA.
I removed the HVAC, airbags, horns, E brake, replaced the stock shifter with a Pro Stick, lightweight carpet, backseat and passenger seat, spare and jack, seatbelts and hardware (except for driver) and I will get to the rear bumper support sometime next week.
I forgot about the sunvisors, thanks for reminding me Fred.
I plan on a 3000 lb raceweight without me in it. I think I can get there with a cage installed but the stereo will have to go eventually and some lighter brakes and a Kmember, also some fiberglass body stuff.
It really depends on what you can live without.
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 09:03 AM
  #8  
myslowcamaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,326
From: fairless hills pa
Re: losing weight...

Originally Posted by Injuneer

i think everyones passenger side sun visor deletes itself.
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 01:40 PM
  #9  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Re: losing weight...

Then there's this classic link from LS1 Tech.com.....

http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/archiv...p/t-17319.html
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 05:52 PM
  #10  
fasteddie94's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 609
From: Winchester, VA
Re: losing weight...

Wow! There's a lot in that link! I guess I've got to do some compromising and figure what I can live with out. I am putting forged aluminum pistons and rods with a forged crank. How much more does that weigh than stock? It's basically done but I'd like to know anyway. Thaks for the ideas fellas.
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 09:42 PM
  #11  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Re: losing weight...

The problem with a lot of the high performance parts is that they add weight rather than reduce it. On my Formula, with lightweight drag wheels and tires, no A/C, no back seat, spare, lightweight racing seat, etc and a lot of common weight reduction items, my car still weighed 3,760# with me (185#) in it. Stuff like the roll bar (even though its lighter weight chrome moly) and heavy suspension components added a lot of weight back on.

After my last round of cuts - bumper pads, steering wheel/airbag, stereo, 50# 4" Mufflex catback, 1 horn, the visors, a lot of carpet backing, all heat shields, etc. - and some add-ons with the Gear Vendors O/D unit, and a beefy Spohn rear drag sway bar - the car is only down to 3,635# with me in it.
Old Aug 3, 2010 | 05:39 AM
  #12  
Rob94hawk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 341
Originally Posted by Injuneer
Then there's this classic link from LS1 Tech.com.....

http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/archiv...p/t-17319.html
Hmm, I was right. Chromoly k member = -30lbs. But which one?
Old Aug 3, 2010 | 02:19 PM
  #13  
crushah's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 89
Don't forget to empty the ashtray.
Old Aug 3, 2010 | 05:15 PM
  #14  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Originally Posted by Rob94hawk
Hmm, I was right. Chromoly k member = -30lbs. But which one?
Lighter is not always better. A street driven car needs more strength than some of the tubular K-members can provide. Even on a track car, a buddy of mine broke a PA Racing K-member with a hard drop from a wheelstand. The welds were terrible.
Old Aug 4, 2010 | 08:23 AM
  #15  
Rob94hawk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 341
Originally Posted by Injuneer
Lighter is not always better. A street driven car needs more strength than some of the tubular K-members can provide. Even on a track car, a buddy of mine broke a PA Racing K-member with a hard drop from a wheelstand. The welds were terrible.
You're talking about slamming the whole front end of the car down on the track and you claim the welds were terrible? That sounds a little hypocritical Fred lol



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:45 AM.