Forced Induction Supercharger/Turbocharger

Why come we dont pull vac on PCV hardline?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-05-2009, 10:23 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
4-RILLA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin Tx
Posts: 151
Why come we dont pull vac on PCV hardline?

Wat up fella's, quick question

I was wondering why come in forced induction applications, we dont see a vac source connected to the PCV hardline? The intake manifold pulls vacuum on the crankase via this line and PCV valve when the intake has vaccum present, and I have seen where guys (myself included) connect a vaccum source to the valvecovers..I am using the exhaust evac kit from Mr. Gasket...but really dont "like" the oil flowing thru my XR1's....my engine does have excessive blo-by and is getting refreshed.

My friends Grand national uses a LT1 smog pump to pull vaccum on his valvecovers when his manifold see's 5lbd of boost..via a hobs switch and a racetronix kit for this purpose and it works flawless on his car for about a year and a half now..he DID modify the pump but it wasnt nohing major,,just got a write-up off of the Turbo Buick forums,

What I was wanting to do,,is Tee into the hardine right at the midway point from the PCV valve to the intake vac port with a electric vac pump...I would put a ONE WAY check valve inline right under the throttle body to ensure that when the vac pump kicks on..it will not pull air OUT of the intake..the flow of the system would only flow from PCV to intake vac port and then under boost the check valve would unsure that the Vac port would not release any boost pressure BACK toward the PCV valve..but what WOULD happen is the crackcase flow would go PCV valve to electric vav pump..thru a inline oil separater...

It seems like this would have a more dirct pull on the crankcase rather than pulling vac on the valvecovers as the Turbo buick guys do, and the electric vac pump would be "transparent" to the intake vac port due to the one way check valve being inline and the pump would only kick on when the intake is pressurized anyway, so the pressurized flow would STOP at the check valve...but ont he OTHER side (PCV SIDE) of the check valve pump would be pulling excess crank pressure.

Thought Suggestions?

Thanks
Rod
4-RILLA is offline  
Old 10-05-2009, 10:43 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
MikeGyver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Orem, UT
Posts: 1,497
They both dump into the same area, lifter valley.

The PCV valve hole in the intake manifold goes though a sheet metal baffle with 4 small holes in it. It's more of a restriction than the valve cover hole, you'd be better off just goin there.
MikeGyver is offline  
Old 10-05-2009, 11:08 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
4-RILLA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin Tx
Posts: 151
Yeh I looked at the LT1 intake really good when I was pondering on this...I didnt think that the port on the intake would be a more restrictive path to crackcase...guess the why GM has the vac port pull vaccum there instead of valvecovers...may have too much crankcase oil vapor entering intake I guess huh?

The thought of running a breather on the pass side valvecover to vnt the crackcase pressure until vac pump kicks on has crossed my mind..because if I have the pump kickon at 5psi boost then I have a situation where the intake isnt pulling vaccum on the crackcase because it has 5psi of boost in it and if there is no vents/breathers on valvecovers...the crankcase pressure has nowhere to go until the vac pump comes on at 5psi...but dam, with a breather there..the vac pump would be pulling atmoshpere from THAT valvecover when it does kick on?
4-RILLA is offline  
Old 03-16-2010, 08:48 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Walter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: shirley,ny,usa
Posts: 140
I only use this system on both my Procharged cars


Name:  1.jpg
Views: 34
Size:  99.8 KB
Name:  2.jpg
Views: 33
Size:  88.9 KB
Walter is offline  
Old 03-16-2010, 09:51 AM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
4-RILLA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin Tx
Posts: 151
Pretty nifty, are both of your procharged cars LTx cars? how do you have those plumed into the crankcase trace, are you juss running a hose from each valvecover to each catch can? did you block the stock PCV system in the intake?

I am Looking into something like what you are doing, but at the same time I see then Turbo Buick guys running the Modified LT1 smog pump evac system with GOOD results, I think most of them have a hobbs switch in the intake that kicks on the pump at 3-4 psi of boost pressure..Only thing I really wonder with that is where does the excess crankcase pressure go until u hit 3-4 psi and the pump turns on...I would imagine with the PCV system intact you would have the PCV valve pulling out excess crankcase pressure while vacuum is in the intake...but then again maybe until the pump kicks on..the crankcase would vent throught the line going to the pump until it kicks on...

Thanks for those pics...would like to see how those are orientated under the hood of your car.
4-RILLA is offline  
Old 03-16-2010, 10:30 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Walter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: shirley,ny,usa
Posts: 140
My FI LT1 camaro i have a 3/8's hose/fuel line running from each valve cover to the Vented breather catch can, my breather can has 2 barbs for both valve covers. This vents and purges any crankcase pressure,

I have the non vented closed loop can running inbetween the vally port and the PCV valve port with a GN check valve in place to insure no boost enters the crankcase.

I have the throttle body port cap off
Walter is offline  
Old 03-16-2010, 12:12 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
4-RILLA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin Tx
Posts: 151
How has this set-up worked for you? Have you had any rear main seal leaks under boost? or oil pan leaks?

Thx
4-RILLA is offline  
Old 03-17-2010, 05:29 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
97WS6Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Florence, Kentucky
Posts: 1,546
4-rilla,

I really like the idea of the smog pump on a hobbs switch. Sounds like it would work great. The catch can really only needs to go to one valve cover. If you have more blowby than that then you really have problems.
97WS6Pilot is offline  
Old 03-17-2010, 10:18 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Walter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: shirley,ny,usa
Posts: 140
True, but i like to vent both valve covers , even it out , nothing to to with to much blowby.
Walter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
karpetcm
Parts For Sale
5
08-14-2015 03:02 PM
whitehooptie
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
3
08-10-2015 07:02 AM
techstar
LS1 Based Engine Tech
8
08-06-2015 11:20 AM
colts0455
LT1 Based Engine Tech
22
07-24-2015 04:51 PM
Z28amustangklr
LT1 Based Engine Tech
0
07-18-2015 11:05 AM



Quick Reply: Why come we dont pull vac on PCV hardline?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:38 AM.