twin turbo or supercharger
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,313
Re: twin turbo or supercharger
Turbo > S/c. The level of control alone makes it worthwhile. No need to swap pullies, etc... Can't overlook the power/tq gains over a belt-driven blower either. I really think it is the superior of the two F/I's.
Go with a single if possible. Less complicated, and probably a bit cheaper due to it having lesser parts than TT kit.
Go with a single if possible. Less complicated, and probably a bit cheaper due to it having lesser parts than TT kit.
Last edited by RiceEating5.0; Jul 30, 2004 at 01:08 AM.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,784
From: Jacksonville
Re: twin turbo or supercharger
Originally Posted by engineermike
Really?!? Why not?
**Edit** Well, maybe not in the time it takes to install a blower, but still it can be done over a weekend.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 971
From: Colorado
Re: twin turbo or supercharger
Originally Posted by YenkoBigBlock
I agree with 97WS6. Just like a bypass valve on a turbo, it's not really there to make the turbo useless unless it's at WOT. I'd go with a supercharger all the way, turbos are for 4 bangers. (And Lingenfelter) 
you got your doors blown off by a turbo car, didnt you???
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,784
From: Jacksonville
Re: twin turbo or supercharger
Originally Posted by 5.0THIS
you got your doors blown off by a turbo car, didnt you???
Personally, I'm close to foaming at the mouth to order myself a hot parts setup from Jose, but I've got to finish my truck first. I've gone from wanting a moderate T60 something to the point where I've decided on a PT88. 9's here I come.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post