Forced Induction Supercharger/Turbocharger

Street twin + 8lbs = What flywheel?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 31, 2003 | 03:07 AM
  #1  
JWBerk94Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 334
From: Huntington/Barboursville, WV, USA
Street twin + 8lbs = What flywheel?

Ok guys I have a quick question. I am getting a good deal on a street twin and I need to know which flywheel I should get, steel or aluminum.

I am going with the street twin because I am planning on getting a intercooled procharger in about a year. Need to buy good stuff, and from what I can tell from this board, the street twin is the only way to go.

My car isn't a dailey driver but can be at times. I don't race much, just the occasional red light to red light, maybe 1 trip to the track per year. I mostly just drive it when I want to have a little fun. I am thinking that I may want to go with the aluminum.

What is my best choice?

Thanks guys
Old May 31, 2003 | 09:56 AM
  #2  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
I am not sure. When I had the T56 in I used the ST with the Al flywheel. The car was hard to launch at the track, it really wanted to either bog or spin. So for the track, I think the steel flywheel would have helped. OTOH, you don't go to the track much. In that case, the aluminum flywheel is probably the best choice on the general principle that it's good to decrease the rotating mass, special situations aside. I never had a problem accelerating smoothly from a stop on the street. I think if you had a really wild cam with poor low end torque and responsiveness the steel FW would be helpful, otherwise go Al.

Rich Krause
Old May 31, 2003 | 07:46 PM
  #3  
JWBerk94Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 334
From: Huntington/Barboursville, WV, USA
Hey Rich thanks for the reply. How noticable was the aluminum flywheel?

Could you tell much of a difference?

Thanks
Old May 31, 2003 | 08:53 PM
  #4  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Originally posted by JWBerk94Z
Hey Rich thanks for the reply. How noticable was the aluminum flywheel?

Could you tell much of a difference?

Thanks
Like I said, when using slicks it seemed to be hard to get the launch right. There was a fine line between too little revs and bogging and too much with lots of wheel spin. On the street, the faster revving was noticible when the clutch was not engaged.

Rich Krause
Old Jun 1, 2003 | 03:03 AM
  #5  
Highlander's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,082
From: San Juan PR
I have a CenterForce Dual Friction with the Al flywheel and so far it has held 600rwhp...

I think that its because of the Al flywheel...

I recommend it...
Old Jun 1, 2003 | 10:26 AM
  #6  
RichJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 202
From: Great Falls, VA
I've got a steel ST in my car. I went with the steel to save money. I have not noticed any ill effects from the weight of the flywheel. I went from stock rear, aluminum driveshaft and stock clutch to a 12 bolt, heavy 3" steel Denny's driveshaft and a steel street twin. The car ran the same MPH at the track with both setups (maybe it would have run higher MPH with the aluminum?), but it was virtually impossible to get drag radials to 60 foot well with the heavy clutch. On the street the car drives great. I expected to feel sluggishness with the added rotating mass, but didn't notice anything.

That all being said, if I had the money I'd get the aluminum flywheel for its theoretical advantage. There was a big article on the effect of flywheel weight at the strip and on the dyno a few issues ago in Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords. It may still be online somewhere.

Rich
Old Jun 2, 2003 | 12:58 AM
  #7  
96speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,248
From: Houston, TX
Originally posted by rskrause
I am not sure. When I had the T56 in I used the ST with the Al flywheel. The car was hard to launch at the track, it really wanted to either bog or spin. So for the track, I think the steel flywheel would have helped. OTOH, you don't go to the track much. In that case, the aluminum flywheel is probably the best choice on the general principle that it's good to decrease the rotating mass, special situations aside. I never had a problem accelerating smoothly from a stop on the street. I think if you had a really wild cam with poor low end torque and responsiveness the steel FW would be helpful, otherwise go Al.

Rich Krause
My car is very similar with the Steel FW: bog or spin. I think its an Fbody thing. A buddy of mine has a 97 Mustang that has the smoothest clutch I've ever felt. It was incredibly easy to manipulate.

Ryan
Old Jun 2, 2003 | 03:45 PM
  #8  
JordonMusser's Avatar
West South Central Moderator / Special Guest
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 1,650
From: Coppell, TX USA
street twins are on/off switches. hence they are hard to launch with, unless you have a LOT of traction(7K clutch dump) etc


get the lighter one. the AL street twin is nearly as heavy as a stock clutch assembly.
Old Jun 3, 2003 | 03:36 AM
  #9  
JWBerk94Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 334
From: Huntington/Barboursville, WV, USA
Wow, I just got a reply from ACA performance as to how much the flywheels weigh. 33lbs steel 15lbs aluminum

How much does the stock flywheel weigh? Man, 15 seems really light.

Thanks for the replies guys, keep 'em coming.
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 02:48 PM
  #10  
WS6 TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 520
From: MD
Some weights for you guys:
Stock (well worn) LT1 assembly that I just ran across in my basement:
Everything + hardware: 41lb 11oz
Flywheel: 20lb 5oz
Clutch disk: 4lb 5oz
Pressure plate: 14lb 7oz

Weighed on a different scale (but accurate as far as I remember):
Street twin, aluminum: 38.5lb
Street twin, steel 51lb

I have an aluminum flywheel ST, and have driven a number of others, aluminum and steel.

The problem with them, the reason why they seem so on/off is that they have unsprung hubs to make room for the 2 clutch disks, so there isn’t much to cushion the engagement. That Al flywheel version is much more harsh then the Fe (steel) one, mostly because the higher mass of the heavier assembly dampens things some, making it much more pleasant to drive.

For me the choice is simple. If it’s a street car, driver, street strip car, then go steel. If it’s a road race or drag race only car then go aluminum (yea, I know, traditionally you go with a heavier flywheel for dragracing, but that’s with big gear splits and narrow powerbands, neither is an issue in f-bodies, aluminum will be faster). If you’re debating (well, I do go to the track a lot…), look at it this way, I’m at the track every Friday, and if I were to do it again I’d go steel. You really have to be a patient person to live with the aluminum one in traffic, and yea, the steel one is that much better to drive, it could be mistaken for a stock clutch, no way the aluminum one could be.
Old Jun 5, 2003 | 11:04 PM
  #11  
RCF925's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 608
WS6 TA, You just made me feel better about going with the steel flywheel I just put in with a new 385, What you said was what I was thinking when I bought it and have had friends that have had aluminum flywheels on the street and have switched to steel.
Old Jun 6, 2003 | 04:53 PM
  #12  
Highlander's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,082
From: San Juan PR
I use aluminum.. I had it balanced with my clutch.. My car is neutrally balanced...

I would go with Al.. its lighter.
Old Jun 7, 2003 | 03:03 AM
  #13  
JWBerk94Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 334
From: Huntington/Barboursville, WV, USA
I thought these things came balanced from McCleod?

I don't mind the clutch being on/off quick. I don't want a lot of clutch chatter if I let out slowly. Is chatter what I am going to get by going al?

Thanks
Old Jun 7, 2003 | 08:41 AM
  #14  
Chris B's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 219
From: College Station, Tx, USA
I had mine rebalanced also - even after knocking off the weight it was not a good zero balance - I would have your flywheel then your whole assembly spun up, even if only for cheap insurance.


Chris
Old Jun 7, 2003 | 11:43 AM
  #15  
RCF925's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 608
I had my ST balanced, It was so far out they had to add weights to the Flywheel



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16 PM.