Forced Induction Supercharger/Turbocharger

Stock MAF on "pressure" side?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 07:39 AM
  #1  
rskrause's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Stock MAF on "pressure" side?

Anyone running a stock MAF on the "pressure" side of a high boost setup? I am thinking about trying this and would like to hear what experience others have had with this mod. I am trying to lower the inlet restriction on my Procharger F1 setup. When we completely disconnected the intake tubing and ran SD we saw a 4lb boost increase! And that's with a custom 4" rigid intake pipe.

Rich Krause
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 07:43 AM
  #2  
MEAN LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,983
From: Jacksonville,fla
Re: Stock MAF on "pressure" side?

Originally posted by rskrause
Anyone running a stock MAF on the "pressure" side of a high boost setup? I am thinking about trying this and would like to hear what experience others have had with this mod. I am trying to lower the inlet restriction on my Procharger F1 setup. When we completely disconnected the intake tubing and ran SD we saw a 4lb boost increase! And that's with a custom 4" rigid intake pipe.

Rich Krause

So far, everything is good. Im sure yo already will know this but you just have to worry about maxing out the maf now that your considering moving the maf to the pressure side.
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 09:00 AM
  #3  
Chris B's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 219
From: College Station, Tx, USA
I am going to do this in my setup (though still haven't gotten around to bolting it all up - have an every growing pile of parts in the closet ).

I have done this on a few other peoples FI setups, and honestly I like it better. I generally had an easier time getting a smooth/stable idle, and other readings seemed repeatable. It does change the response of the maf (calibration), so you will have to do a bit of re-tuning, but I think it is definitely worth it. As a bonus piping is now simplified as you can vent the BOV directly to the atmosphere.

I have *heard* (never seen) of problems with the plastic bodied MAF's at >15lbs of boost.

you just have to worry about maxing out the maf now that your considering moving the maf to the pressure side


Really it should read the same on either side, as the sensor measures massflow. The change in positioning will effect the calibration of the sensor to a certain extent, but we are talking a small percentage here, not the difference between maxining out the MAF or not (which you should be on any decent FI setup ).

Chris
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 01:37 PM
  #4  
rskrause's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Thanks, Chris.

Yes, it's already maxed out.

Rich Krause
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 03:39 PM
  #5  
96TurboTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 647
From: Brockton, Ma
Chris, whatever happened to the Pro-M MAF and the voltage to frequency converter you were building?
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 04:21 PM
  #6  
tobin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 34
From: Colorado Springs, CO
I have only heard of it going on the intake side. That is alot of heat and air for a plastic MAF sensor to handle. If it is stock, I definately recommend putting it on the intake side of the charger, If it is aftermarket, then maybe you can get away with it going on the boost side of the charger. In any case, good luck!

T
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 04:48 PM
  #7  
rskrause's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Originally posted by tobin
I have only heard of it going on the intake side. That is alot of heat and air for a plastic MAF sensor to handle. If it is stock, I definately recommend putting it on the intake side of the charger, If it is aftermarket, then maybe you can get away with it going on the boost side of the charger. In any case, good luck!

T
I have a stock sensor in a metal housing.

Rich Krause
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 06:17 PM
  #8  
RCF925's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 608
I have a Vortech with the Maf relocated up top and have had no problems. I am only running 5lbs boost right now but the MAF is almost maxed out. The only reason Vortech recomends putting it on the Intake side I think was for smog reasons, and a read an earlier post on the board that said ATI recommends putting the MAF topside as well. Personally I think you get a more accuarate reading up top as that is where they locate the stock ones.

Last edited by RCF925; Jan 9, 2004 at 06:21 PM.
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 07:32 PM
  #9  
SMOKNZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 1,178
From: Cleveland, WI
I ran mine up to 18 psi on the pressure side. I was running the ATI twin intercoolers, and used an aluminum elbow (vortech) and had the MAF right at the end of that. I had absolutely no problems with it running there. Like I've stated times before, I haven't had any problems running it before or after the MAF with the BOV either venting metered or nonmetered air.

Bill
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 08:33 PM
  #10  
Chris B's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 219
From: College Station, Tx, USA
Originally posted by 96TurboTA
Chris, whatever happened to the Pro-M MAF and the voltage to frequency converter you were building?
Still there - going to be on the pressure side actually have a tone of parts in my closet, just been so busy with school/work I haven't had a chance to put it all together (plus I still need to fab up the intercooler piping). I ended up scrapping the circuit with the V-F converter as it drifted to much vs. temperature (LJ and Harlan both warned me to watch out for that) - I now am using an avr Mega8 to sample the voltage and output the frequency - it's pretty accurate

Chris
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 10:41 PM
  #11  
96TurboTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 647
From: Brockton, Ma
Originally posted by Chris B
Still there - going to be on the pressure side actually have a tone of parts in my closet, just been so busy with school/work I haven't had a chance to put it all together (plus I still need to fab up the intercooler piping). I ended up scrapping the circuit with the V-F converter as it drifted to much vs. temperature (LJ and Harlan both warned me to watch out for that) - I now am using an avr Mega8 to sample the voltage and output the frequency - it's pretty accurate

Chris
Cool. Can't wait to see the results.
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 11:01 PM
  #12  
96 WS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,967
From: Bay Area, CA, USA
My MAF has been on the pressure side for a few thousand miles... no problems here.
Old Jan 10, 2004 | 03:10 AM
  #13  
y2khawk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 22
From: Waterford, MI USA
Originally posted by Chris B
I ended up scrapping the circuit with the V-F converter as it drifted to much vs. temperature (LJ and Harlan both warned me to watch out for that) - I now am using an avr Mega8 to sample the voltage and output the frequency - it's pretty accurate
Now that's how to do it

AVR have more than 8 bit resolution? Curious how the conversion granularity is.

either way, much better solution. My box from Pro-m was too sketchy for my taste, and when it crapped out i ditched their MAF for the current setup.

I've always run the MAF on the pressure side with great results.
Old Jan 10, 2004 | 07:39 AM
  #14  
rskrause's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Seems clear that there is no good reason not to go over to the pressure side with the MAF.

Thanks.

Rich Krause
Old Jan 10, 2004 | 12:12 PM
  #15  
96 WS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,967
From: Bay Area, CA, USA
The obvious reason for moving the MAF up to the pressurized side is of course to minimize the chance of an innacurate air flow reading. Since the MAF is right next to the intake manifold there is not much room for a leak. Other than that some people have had it help with surging, idle, etc.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 AM.