Forced Induction Supercharger/Turbocharger

stock crank+boost+rpm=?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 07:39 PM
  #1  
1QuikTransAm's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 174
From: Southern Va
Question stock crank+boost+rpm=?

Been throwing around the idea of building a blown 355 over the winter and have been lingering around the FI forum alot. I've found most of the answers to my ?'s except for one. I plan on using my stock crank, forged eagle rods, and -21cc dish TRW pistons with the addition of an ati procharger p1-sc...running around 8-10 lbs.

I know the stock crank can handle the power pretty well but just wondering how high I can spin the crank on the boost mentioned and not worry about it breaking?

The car is 95% a street car, but it will probably see the track a little bit next season.

Thanks,
Adam
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 08:59 AM
  #2  
94 NO TOP Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 393
From: NASHVILLE, TN
Re: stock crank+boost+rpm=?

I ran the stock crank for awhile with the P600B with no problem with a redline about 6K. A friend has been running stock crank, reconditioned stock rods, and TRW pisons for years with no problems with a small blower. You don't need to spin it over 6K with most mild blower cams anyway.
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 10:22 AM
  #3  
1QuikTransAm's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 174
From: Southern Va
Re: stock crank+boost+rpm=?

That's exactly what I wanted to hear! Thanks alot.
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 10:42 AM
  #4  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Re: stock crank+boost+rpm=?

If you plan on reasonable boost there is no need to replace the OEM rods.

Rich
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 12:39 PM
  #5  
SMOKNZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 1,178
From: Cleveland, WI
Re: stock crank+boost+rpm=?

And for the malory your going to need to ballance the stock crank with the heavy rods and pistons you might as well spend the extra $550 and get the Eagle Forged crank to go along with it.
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 03:31 PM
  #6  
94 NO TOP Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 393
From: NASHVILLE, TN
Re: stock crank+boost+rpm=?

As in the case with most of us we only start out running a little boost and don't need much. In the future you will want more power and boost so it might be worth it to go ahead and get a good crank and some rods even though the initial cost will hurt. It will cost $200 just to balance a crank. If you replace it later it will be another $200 for balancing on the new one.
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 05:56 PM
  #7  
1QuikTransAm's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 174
From: Southern Va
Re: stock crank+boost+rpm=?

I really don't know that I will have the extra $ for another crank or even new rods. If I do, I wll definitely invest in both.


Originally Posted by rskrause
If you plan on reasonable boost there is no need to replace the OEM rods.

Rich
Exactly how much boost is considered "reasonable" on the stock rods and crank? If it's about 10 lbs., then i'm good to go.

Thanks
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 07:25 PM
  #8  
slomarao's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,705
Re: stock crank+boost+rpm=?

The amount of boost some guys get away with my not be the same for you. It depednds on your setup, the crank is stronger than the rods. The powered metal rods are rated @450hp. People also run at 500rwhp, so there is no telling what will happed. You have to figure out how much power do you want and can afford. Then build accordingly, otherwise you may end up building a motor and replacing the crank or rods after one season. I personally would not 10psi or over on stock rods, with heads and cam the 355 your thinking of building will be around 500-550rwhp, depending on if you get afr's and spin it to 7000rpm or port the stock castings and run a small blower grind. Do some more research, see what others guys are running. good luck
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 10:50 AM
  #9  
EDS Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 705
From: Southern CA
Re: stock crank+boost+rpm=?

I would say the stock crank would be okay, but not the rods. You could get a scat 9000 series cast crank which is stronger for about $200. Scat also has some h-beam rods and I beam rods which are considerably stronger than the stock PM rods.
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 11:00 AM
  #10  
NC-LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 252
From: wilmington, NC USA
Re: stock crank+boost+rpm=?

what smoknz is trying to tell you in advance is the same thing both he and I found out the hard way... the TRW pistons and H-beam rods are going to require the stock crank to have quite a bit of mallory which is not a particularly cheap investment and is adding no value to the rotating assembly, it is just a requirement to get the heavier slug/rod combo to balance.. you will not be far dollar wise from a forged/heavier crank that would not require mallory to balance due to meatier counterweights that would be drilled for balancing rather then added too. if you don't get the forged crank when you go to pick up your shortblock.. you engine builder is going to have a suprise bill for you.. just a little fair warning. paying that much and knowing you could have gone forged is a little depressing.. your buying worthless mallory and gaining nothing in the reliability department.

Chris
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 11:15 PM
  #11  
SiCk PuPpY's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 134
From: Roy, Utah
Re: stock crank+boost+rpm=?

Originally Posted by NC-LT1
what smoknz is trying to tell you in advance is the same thing both he and I found out the hard way... the TRW pistons and H-beam rods are going to require the stock crank to have quite a bit of mallory which is not a particularly cheap investment and is adding no value to the rotating assembly, it is just a requirement to get the heavier slug/rod combo to balance.. you will not be far dollar wise from a forged/heavier crank that would not require mallory to balance due to meatier counterweights that would be drilled for balancing rather then added too. if you don't get the forged crank when you go to pick up your shortblock.. you engine builder is going to have a suprise bill for you.. just a little fair warning. paying that much and knowing you could have gone forged is a little depressing.. your buying worthless mallory and gaining nothing in the reliability department.

Chris
Chris,
Mallory would only have to be added if the pistons/ rods were heavier than the stock parts, correct? Otheriwse, as in my case with the Weiscos and Eagle SIRs, we ended up with the following weights (in grams) which were much lighter:

Piston- 485
Pin- 116
rings- 50
locks- 4
total rods- 549
insert- 49
rotary-890

And with the lighter components, significant weight was removed from the crank to balance the rotating assembly.
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 11:20 PM
  #12  
SiCk PuPpY's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 134
From: Roy, Utah
Re: stock crank+boost+rpm=?

Originally Posted by EDS Z28
I would say the stock crank would be okay, but not the rods. You could get a scat 9000 series cast crank which is stronger for about $200. Scat also has some h-beam rods and I beam rods which are considerably stronger than the stock PM rods.
The rods would definately be the next weakest link after the pistons. I paid $204 ofr a set of Eagle SIR rods which were considerably better than the Scat product. I ahve heard fro mseveral people that the Scat crank needs extensive amounts of mallory to bring it into balance. You would be better off sticking with your stock crank or ponying up the funds for a decent forged one.
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 05:22 AM
  #13  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Re: stock crank+boost+rpm=?

I wonder why people think the Eagle SIR rods are better than the stockers?

Rich
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 07:54 AM
  #14  
SMOKNZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 1,178
From: Cleveland, WI
Re: stock crank+boost+rpm=?

Originally Posted by SiCk PuPpY
Chris,
Mallory would only have to be added if the pistons/ rods were heavier than the stock parts, correct? Otheriwse, as in my case with the Weiscos and Eagle SIRs, we ended up with the following weights (in grams) which were much lighter:

Piston- 485
Pin- 116
rings- 50
locks- 4
total rods- 549
insert- 49
rotary-890

And with the lighter components, significant weight was removed from the crank to balance the rotating assembly.
Seeing as this thread was about Forged TRW slugs and eagle H-beams it's pretty safe to assume we are dealing with a significant weight gain over stock parts
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 10:08 AM
  #15  
SiCk PuPpY's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 134
From: Roy, Utah
Re: stock crank+boost+rpm=?

Originally Posted by SMOKNZ
Seeing as this thread was about Forged TRW slugs and eagle H-beams it's pretty safe to assume we are dealing with a significant weight gain over stock parts
Absolutely, I only wanted to address the fact that if they were to go with lighter than stock parts, then malory would most likely not be an issue. That is unless they got a completely different crank (Scat). I apologize if my statement above seemed to contrast that. I guesss the first think to ask would be how much are you willing to spend.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:54 PM.