Forced Induction Supercharger/Turbocharger

Some Questions on turbos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 07:25 PM
  #1  
DarkJuggalo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 38
From: Ansonia, CT/ WarWick, RI
Some Questions on turbos

ive been toying with the idea of turbo charging my 3rd gen for a couple months and i have a couple questions.

which would produce more power and least risk 355 or 383 i intend on using a good size turbo t70+++
i was told by a couple buddies that have turbo charged 355s that 383s cant support turbos with out breaking a lot of stuff. but then reading some forums and what not i was thinkin why wouldnt a 383 stroker be a good bet for a tc. high rev= more spooling. am i right or wrong?
(the motor is a 79 btw)

whats the better vehicle to put it on a 3rd or 4th gen?
i want it on my 3rd gen but if a 4th gen is a better choice for aero dynamics and what not then ill start the hunt for a 4th gen.

and whats a good tranny to put on a tc'd car? i was told by my buddy a 700r4 is best bet due to the OD for highway and it gives more room with the extra gear to spool.

id appreciate some opinions/facts thz =)
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 07:34 PM
  #2  
engineermike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
First of all, most power and least risk don't really go together when choosing between the 355 and 383 on a T4 turbo. You see, when using turbo's in the T70 - T76 range, the 355 will offer the most power when the turbo is max'd out at 18+ psi. However, when running lower boost levels (5 - 15 psi), the 383 will make more power. A 383 will spool the turbo slightly quicker, but it won't be noticeable.

There is no difference in reliability between 355 and 383 at the same boost level.

A 3rd gen would be a better vehicle to put it in simply because there is way, way more room for the turbo, not to mention the car is lighter.

Whomever told you that a 700R4 is the best tranny for a turbo motor is wrong. Don't ever listen to that person again. The TH350/TH400/PG is a must if you're going to make real power. A 700R4 will not hold up unless you spend $3000 on one.
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 11:41 PM
  #3  
DarkJuggalo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 38
From: Ansonia, CT/ WarWick, RI
hmm, would i have to do a lot to a th350 to hold up to the power?
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 12:04 AM
  #4  
Chrisbequick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 669
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by DarkJuggalo
i was thinkin why wouldnt a 383 stroker be a good bet for a tc. high rev= more spooling. am i right or wrong?
Engine displacement has almost nothing to do with the peak RPM. A 383 is more about torque than revs. If you wanted to spin to the moon you typically want a short stroke motor like a 355. With a little turbo like a T70 you won't won't need to turn 7 grand to spool it. Boost threshhold is going to be relatively low on a V8 with a little turbo like a T70.

As far as how strong the motor needs to be, turbos are easier on internals than nitrous, but if you have a choice go with a forged rotating assembly. Personally, I'm running a stock crank and rods, but that's only because I blew all my money on building the turbo kit.

-Chris
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 06:03 AM
  #5  
engineermike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Originally Posted by DarkJuggalo
hmm, would i have to do a lot to a th350 to hold up to the power?
A decent build with a billet sprag has made mine hold up extremely well behind 900 hp.

Mike
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LeftoverChinese
Parts For Sale
24
Jan 14, 2024 03:03 PM
RUENUF
South Atlantic
4
Mar 13, 2016 03:39 PM
DirtyDaveW
Parts For Sale
1
Mar 15, 2015 07:01 PM
Newgmman
Drivetrain
0
Feb 25, 2015 02:53 PM
blac94Z
Forced Induction
6
Jan 22, 2015 11:19 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 AM.