Forced Induction Supercharger/Turbocharger

Remote Turbo Mounting

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 18, 2003 | 02:11 PM
  #1  
therealmagyver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 502
From: Miami, FL USA
Remote Turbo Mounting

My twin is going to visit a dude selling his kit this weekend to test it out. Looks good from what I hear. The price seems reasonable too, but I'm not turbo expert. I know I don't want clutter under my hood. The turbo is under the car where the muffler would be. I can't post a link cuz they are not sponsors, but yall can do a search on google.com
Old Dec 18, 2003 | 02:29 PM
  #2  
Aklaim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 602
From: San Jose, Ca
Im pretty sure you can post a link to it......just dont try and sell it to us.
Old Dec 18, 2003 | 06:56 PM
  #3  
therealmagyver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 502
From: Miami, FL USA
Not trying to sell, but I am excited. The clutter under the engine is the main reason I haven't installed turbo.
Old Dec 18, 2003 | 07:00 PM
  #4  
JordonMusser's Avatar
West South Central Moderator / Special Guest
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 1,650
From: Coppell, TX USA
I would rather have clutter and go fast, than no clutter and go slow
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 10:13 AM
  #5  
magius231's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 956
From: Winston Salem, NC
if your referring to the sts turbo kit, I wouldn't really say its slow...maybe not full race performance but for someone woh doesn't want to cut up their engine compartment and still make good power it seems to be doing really well.

Last edited by magius231; Dec 19, 2003 at 02:13 PM.
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 05:23 PM
  #6  
JordonMusser's Avatar
West South Central Moderator / Special Guest
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 1,650
From: Coppell, TX USA
I wasnt saying the STS kit is slow, I am simply saying that as a "hot rodder" there are trade offs. I aint gonna give up things like AC/ power steering etc.. but more stuffer under the hood is something ill take if it makes my car make 2.5X more hp

besides, most single kits mount the turbo down low, and you really cant even tell its there from on the top.

I decided to mount mine right smack dab on the top
Old Dec 20, 2003 | 05:31 PM
  #7  
aram's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 377
From: San Diego, CA
You have any pics of the turbo mounted there? It would be cool to see.
Old Dec 20, 2003 | 05:48 PM
  #8  
12 Sec GTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 5
From: orlando, florida
The STS turbo kit for the LS1 made 500+rwhp with 9psi and water injection.


Yeah, that's slow.
Old Dec 20, 2003 | 06:00 PM
  #9  
sleeperz28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 839
From: Minnesota
Clutter, a common problem with the engine bay of an LT1. However, I have 2 turbos under my hood mounted nice and high and I bet I can still change plugs faster then a kit with a turbo mounted in the back of the car.
Plus I dont have to worry about a return oil pump failing, causing the turbo seals to fail. Then what are you left with a nice trail of blue in your rear view, well until all the oil is gone

Last edited by sleeperz28; Dec 20, 2003 at 06:10 PM.
Old Dec 20, 2003 | 06:08 PM
  #10  
JordonMusser's Avatar
West South Central Moderator / Special Guest
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 1,650
From: Coppell, TX USA
12secGTA-

let me clarify that i was NOT saying the STS kit is "slow". that was not my point.

were those dyno results at sea level? if I remember correctly, they were not.. and you cant really get an accurate number with a turbo car at anything other than close to sea level (corrections dont work properly).
Old Dec 20, 2003 | 06:28 PM
  #11  
aram's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 377
From: San Diego, CA
Is it just me or does the methonol injection seem to have a lot to do with the dyno numbers coming from the sts kit?

Maybe it's just me but using injected methonal to do all the tuning after installing any kind of FI just doesn't sit right with me.
Old Dec 21, 2003 | 03:03 PM
  #12  
magius231's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 956
From: Winston Salem, NC
Originally posted by sleeperz28
Clutter, a common problem with the engine bay of an LT1. However, I have 2 turbos under my hood mounted nice and high and I bet I can still change plugs faster then a kit with a turbo mounted in the back of the car.
Plus I dont have to worry about a return oil pump failing, causing the turbo seals to fail. Then what are you left with a nice trail of blue in your rear view, well until all the oil is gone
many turbo kits come with an oil pump, not just this one...my question though is what did you have to lose/relocate to get all that in there? The setup you have is nice, don't get me wrong, and I would love to be able to do something like that with mine, however I have no interest in having to change THAT much in the engine bay just to get it to work (being my daily commuter vehicle). For that reason the STS setup seems really good to me.

I think Rick @ STS mentioned there is a LED failure light for the oil pump, not sure if that made it into production?
Old Dec 21, 2003 | 03:29 PM
  #13  
JordonMusser's Avatar
West South Central Moderator / Special Guest
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 1,650
From: Coppell, TX USA
really no need for a failure light, you will know when you see blue smoke... this is a pretty good warning, as long as you dont continue to drive you will be ok.
Old Dec 21, 2003 | 06:59 PM
  #14  
Rival's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 165
From: il
What about the idea of someone unbolting the tubro from under the car? It is nice to know on one can get to under the hood.
Old Dec 22, 2003 | 02:59 AM
  #15  
JordonMusser's Avatar
West South Central Moderator / Special Guest
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 1,650
From: Coppell, TX USA
first of all, the car would have to be jacked up. not to mention the bolts are not exactly easy to get to, and I know on James' setup the bolts are actually on the top side, even tho the turbo is on the bottom.

And obviously you are not aware that it takes 2.5 seconds to pop an fbody hood (with out getting into the cabin)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
brothaslide
2016+ Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and General Discussion
6
Jan 9, 2016 12:11 PM
detroitmuscle
Parts For Sale
0
Jul 31, 2015 04:21 AM
LeftoverChinese
Parts For Sale
0
Jul 23, 2015 03:57 PM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Jul 10, 2015 02:23 PM
Noer
Parts Wanted
0
Jul 4, 2015 05:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:10 AM.