Let the games begin! Turbo vs. supercharger test.
Re: Let the games begin! Turbo vs. supercharger test.
Originally Posted by engineermike
Yes, the boost was very close to the same as the blower. The intercooler had very low pressure drop at 550 rwhp with the blower, so that shouldn't be any different at 525 rwhp with a turbo.
Mike
Mike
Since its spinning higher rpm sooner than the blower it might have just been making hot air.
Did you log IAT's?
Re: Let the games begin! Turbo vs. supercharger test.
Today, I replaced the pipe going from the intercooler to the MAF. I went from 2 1/2" up to 3" mandrel bent, plus I left out my GEN 1 Eclipse bypass valve.
It immediately pegged the boost gauge. I had to back off on the boost controller by over 2 full turns to get it back down to 14 psi boost. At 14 psi boost in the intake, the turbo discharge pressure was a little over 16 psi versus 19 psi before. So, my intake pressure drop is a little over 2 psi versus 5 psi before. Not sure why it's still higher than the supercharger, since I'm using all the same parts. . .
Also, a 3 psi drop in restriction sure seems to have made a big difference as far as the turbo is concerned, since I had to make such a drastic adjustment in the boost controller. I wonder if the bypass valve was leaking also. . .
Mike
It immediately pegged the boost gauge. I had to back off on the boost controller by over 2 full turns to get it back down to 14 psi boost. At 14 psi boost in the intake, the turbo discharge pressure was a little over 16 psi versus 19 psi before. So, my intake pressure drop is a little over 2 psi versus 5 psi before. Not sure why it's still higher than the supercharger, since I'm using all the same parts. . .
Also, a 3 psi drop in restriction sure seems to have made a big difference as far as the turbo is concerned, since I had to make such a drastic adjustment in the boost controller. I wonder if the bypass valve was leaking also. . .
Mike
Re: Let the games begin! Turbo vs. supercharger test.
Originally Posted by engineermike
I wonder if the bypass valve was leaking also. . .
Mike
Mike
Mike
Re: Let the games begin! Turbo vs. supercharger test.
Originally Posted by engineermike
Today, I replaced the pipe going from the intercooler to the MAF. I went from 2 1/2" up to 3" mandrel bent, plus I left out my GEN 1 Eclipse bypass valve.
It immediately pegged the boost gauge. I had to back off on the boost controller by over 2 full turns to get it back down to 14 psi boost. At 14 psi boost in the intake, the turbo discharge pressure was a little over 16 psi versus 19 psi before. So, my intake pressure drop is a little over 2 psi versus 5 psi before. Not sure why it's still higher than the supercharger, since I'm using all the same parts. . .
Also, a 3 psi drop in restriction sure seems to have made a big difference as far as the turbo is concerned, since I had to make such a drastic adjustment in the boost controller. I wonder if the bypass valve was leaking also. . .
Mike
It immediately pegged the boost gauge. I had to back off on the boost controller by over 2 full turns to get it back down to 14 psi boost. At 14 psi boost in the intake, the turbo discharge pressure was a little over 16 psi versus 19 psi before. So, my intake pressure drop is a little over 2 psi versus 5 psi before. Not sure why it's still higher than the supercharger, since I'm using all the same parts. . .
Also, a 3 psi drop in restriction sure seems to have made a big difference as far as the turbo is concerned, since I had to make such a drastic adjustment in the boost controller. I wonder if the bypass valve was leaking also. . .
Mike
How are the IAT's compared to the vortech.
Last edited by Flip94ta; Mar 1, 2005 at 11:50 AM.
Re: Let the games begin! Turbo vs. supercharger test.
Okay. . . finally got some conclusive results today.
Vortech T-trim at 13 psi with Hooker LT's made 548 rwhp.
T-76 GTS at 11 psi, same cam, log header, same intercooler made 547 rwhp. So, at 2 psi less, it made the same hp.
Then. . . I turned the boost up to 19 psi with Methanol injection and it made 680 rwhp through a TH-350 and loose converter - more on that later. . .
Vortech T-trim at 13 psi with Hooker LT's made 548 rwhp.
T-76 GTS at 11 psi, same cam, log header, same intercooler made 547 rwhp. So, at 2 psi less, it made the same hp.
Then. . . I turned the boost up to 19 psi with Methanol injection and it made 680 rwhp through a TH-350 and loose converter - more on that later. . .
Re: Let the games begin! Turbo vs. supercharger test.
I have pic's of the hot parts only, but the link is broken.
Basically, the routing is similar to TTi's kit, but mine uses a 3" log and 3" downpipe, versus their 2 1/2" for both. The turbo is situated in the same location as the Vortech, except the air inlet faces forward. The Vortech Aftercooler is in it's normal location above the driver's side valvecover.
Basically, the routing is similar to TTi's kit, but mine uses a 3" log and 3" downpipe, versus their 2 1/2" for both. The turbo is situated in the same location as the Vortech, except the air inlet faces forward. The Vortech Aftercooler is in it's normal location above the driver's side valvecover.
Re: Let the games begin! Turbo vs. supercharger test.
Originally Posted by engineermike
Okay. . . finally got some conclusive results today.
Vortech T-trim at 13 psi with Hooker LT's made 548 rwhp.
T-76 GTS at 11 psi, same cam, log header, same intercooler made 547 rwhp. So, at 2 psi less, it made the same hp.
Then. . . I turned the boost up to 19 psi with Methanol injection and it made 680 rwhp through a TH-350 and loose converter - more on that later. . .
Vortech T-trim at 13 psi with Hooker LT's made 548 rwhp.
T-76 GTS at 11 psi, same cam, log header, same intercooler made 547 rwhp. So, at 2 psi less, it made the same hp.
Then. . . I turned the boost up to 19 psi with Methanol injection and it made 680 rwhp through a TH-350 and loose converter - more on that later. . .
Re: Let the games begin! Turbo vs. supercharger test.
Dynojet. Keep in mind the tranny/converter. Notice that all the cars making very high rwhp (750+) are 6 speeds, except Big Rick.
At 3750 lb, my car ran 10.40 at 133 mph with 550 rwhp.
At 3750 lb, my car ran 10.40 at 133 mph with 550 rwhp.
Re: Let the games begin! Turbo vs. supercharger test.
Getting back to our original guesses, want to post the dyno graphs of the vortech and the turbo at 13psi, if you did a pull at that boost pressure? I'm curious to see who's guess for the HP and torque is right.
Re: Let the games begin! Turbo vs. supercharger test.
Originally Posted by engineermike
GeoffChadwick: +12 hp, +20 ftlb
RealQuick: +/- 5 hp, +40 ftlb
Fstenuf: +7 hp, +65 ftlb
Turbo6: +20 hp, more torque
Flip94TA: +30 hp
Highlander: +23 hp
Me: -10 hp, +100 ftlb (though I have the advantage of driving the car)
BTW, the old set up made 547 rwhp at 6500 rpm and 571 ftlb 3700 rpm.
Mike
RealQuick: +/- 5 hp, +40 ftlb
Fstenuf: +7 hp, +65 ftlb
Turbo6: +20 hp, more torque
Flip94TA: +30 hp
Highlander: +23 hp
Me: -10 hp, +100 ftlb (though I have the advantage of driving the car)
BTW, the old set up made 547 rwhp at 6500 rpm and 571 ftlb 3700 rpm.
Mike
That makes it right at 31 rwhp more than the supercharger at the same boost level, with supposedly the wrong cam (224/236-114) and a crappy log header.
Congratulations to Flip94TA for the most optimistic and almost exact guess.
Mike




I can't wait to go for a ride in it.