Hmmm... Cutout + Turbo...
Re: Hmmm... Cutout + Turbo...
I think that sounds like a really cool idea! If the cutout is between the headers and the turbo, there won't be any boost. That would be a good way to take the load off the turbo if you wanted to, as long as you don't mind some extra noise.
Re: Hmmm... Cutout + Turbo...
There is no load on the turbo at cruise and putting around. Exhaust energy and volume is what drives the turbo and there isn't enough at cruise to load it up.
Basically, everyone agrees that it will not build boost and it'll be loud. I, for the life of me, can't figure out why these are good things. However, it won't hurt anything either.
Basically, everyone agrees that it will not build boost and it'll be loud. I, for the life of me, can't figure out why these are good things. However, it won't hurt anything either.
Re: Hmmm... Cutout + Turbo...
Originally Posted by engineermike
There is no load on the turbo at cruise and putting around. Exhaust energy and volume is what drives the turbo and there isn't enough at cruise to load it up.
Basically, everyone agrees that it will not build boost and it'll be loud. I, for the life of me, can't figure out why these are good things. However, it won't hurt anything either.
Basically, everyone agrees that it will not build boost and it'll be loud. I, for the life of me, can't figure out why these are good things. However, it won't hurt anything either.
Re: Hmmm... Cutout + Turbo...
Not to mention it would give it that mean rumble at idle that the turbos somewhat muffle
Also, although it probably wouldn't be good for the turbo, it would be kinda neat to go to like 100mph at 4000rpms or whatever, then close the cutout so it is instant full boost
And if it's a street/strip car, I'm sure relieving the turbo of duty when you don't need it will extend the life of both the turbo itself and the engine
Also, although it probably wouldn't be good for the turbo, it would be kinda neat to go to like 100mph at 4000rpms or whatever, then close the cutout so it is instant full boost
And if it's a street/strip car, I'm sure relieving the turbo of duty when you don't need it will extend the life of both the turbo itself and the engine
Re: Hmmm... Cutout + Turbo...
Originally Posted by flatlander757
Also, although it probably wouldn't be good for the turbo, it would be kinda neat to go to like 100mph at 4000rpms or whatever, then close the cutout so it is instant full boost 

umm. negative. Just a guess, but I'm betting the turbo would still take about the same amount of time to spool up. If you're going to be accelerating wouldnt you just want to be using the turbo anyways??
Originally Posted by flatlander757
And if it's a street/strip car, I'm sure relieving the turbo of duty when you don't need it will extend the life of both the turbo itself and the engine 

Re: Hmmm... Cutout + Turbo...
And the other thing is that 18-wheelers driver literally 1,000,000 miles with the turbo loaded and spooled-up just about the whole time. I don't think we're going to wear one out.
Re: Hmmm... Cutout + Turbo...
Well I'm almost 1/5 the way there
(195,000).
I see what you are saying now... not practical.
On a side note, is it possible to turn the boost down to 0psi for street driving?
(195,000).I see what you are saying now... not practical.
On a side note, is it possible to turn the boost down to 0psi for street driving?
Re: Hmmm... Cutout + Turbo...
Yes. There are lots of ways to set up an adjustable boost system. I have two in my GN -- one under the hood, and one in the center console. The under-hood one is more precise, so we typically don't screw with the console, but you could use that kind of adjuster to achieve what you want.
Note: If you're at 0 psi, then your turbo is already spooling up. A naturally aspirated motor has negative manifold pressure.
-Jake
Note: If you're at 0 psi, then your turbo is already spooling up. A naturally aspirated motor has negative manifold pressure.
-Jake
Re: Hmmm... Cutout + Turbo...
Ahhh, forgot about that
Thanks!
Reason I was asking is I think some time eventually(probably 2-3 years from now) I want to get some major power from my car, and turbos seem to be the most efficient way to have a 500-600whp daily driver.
Thanks!
Reason I was asking is I think some time eventually(probably 2-3 years from now) I want to get some major power from my car, and turbos seem to be the most efficient way to have a 500-600whp daily driver.
Re: Hmmm... Cutout + Turbo...
An 8.5/1 motor exhausting through a turbine is pretty underwhelming at 0 psi. I have a High/Low switch for my turbo. At Low, it goes to the base wastegate spring setting, which is about 11 psi. At 11 psi intercooled, 8.3/1 compression and 10/1 A/F ratio, I can beat on it all year and never break it, but still make 550 rwhp.
When I flip the switch, it applies pressure to the closing side of the wastegate and the boost goes to 20 psi, where the Methanol injection comes on and it makes 680 rwhp.
When I flip the switch, it applies pressure to the closing side of the wastegate and the boost goes to 20 psi, where the Methanol injection comes on and it makes 680 rwhp.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tdigger9899
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
9
Sep 7, 2015 10:56 AM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
May 21, 2015 01:04 PM



