Forced Induction Supercharger/Turbocharger

Drivability & big injectors (questions)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 01:36 PM
  #1  
Tekprodave's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 526
From: Sacramento, CA
Drivability & big injectors (questions)

In short, how can you get big injectors to run decently at low rpm while not at WOT? The 75#ers in the Red 95 Z28 (see sig.) run great at WOT but make the car pig rich during normal driving and cause the spark plugs to foul.

Now some details & observations: I had a tuner over and we were trying to solve the issue. A/F ratios at a bit less than 13 at idle and going way lean (11.5) up to about 4krpm causing the car to sputter. For clarification the is not at WOT. 1.3 MS pulse widths. Changes were made until the PW's were at .9ms but the A/F ratios were about the same. Fuel pressure set at 43psi at idle jumps to about 60 psi at times. (Aeromotive APR installed)

Now the big question: Should I run smaller injectors or is there a way to make it happy and not foul the plugs?

Thanks in advance,

Dave
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 04:38 PM
  #2  
Lisa33's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 505
From: Sweden
Rise the idle, oure car runs perfect at 15 a/f at 1350rpm at idle in park (1200 in drive), under that it just dies, no vacum at all beacuse of the cam... Thats widh 150lbs injectors
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 09:12 PM
  #3  
engineermike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Mine idles fine with 84's. You just have to decrease PW enough. I think the stock LTx ECM has a minimum pulse width that only the most recent version of TunerCAT will let you reduce.

Mike
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 09:45 PM
  #4  
Tekprodave's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 526
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by engineermike
Mine idles fine with 84's. You just have to decrease PW enough. I think the stock LTx ECM has a minimum pulse width that only the most recent version of TunerCAT will let you reduce.

Mike
We did use turnercat (not sure what version) to make the reduction to .9ms. The problem with that was when you mash the throttle it would go WAY lean (18:1) and cough before it could catch up with the change.
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 09:46 PM
  #5  
Tekprodave's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 526
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by Lisa33
Rise the idle, oure car runs perfect at 15 a/f at 1350rpm at idle in park (1200 in drive), under that it just dies, no vacum at all beacuse of the cam... Thats widh 150lbs injectors
150's???
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 09:59 PM
  #6  
engineermike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Originally Posted by Tekprodave
We did use turnercat (not sure what version) to make the reduction to .9ms. The problem with that was when you mash the throttle it would go WAY lean (18:1) and cough before it could catch up with the change.
Are you running it in MAF or SD mode? CL or OL?
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 10:11 PM
  #7  
Tekprodave's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 526
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by engineermike
Are you running it in MAF or SD mode? CL or OL?

MAF

Closed loop.
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 10:22 PM
  #8  
engineermike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Have you tried playing with the MAF calibration tables?
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 10:49 PM
  #9  
Tekprodave's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 526
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by engineermike
Have you tried playing with the MAF calibration tables?
Yep we did dable with that and I think that gave us the best results but it wasn't much better.
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 02:52 AM
  #10  
engineermike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
What MAF sensor are you running? If it's not stock, then you should be able to install the stocker, complete with screens, and the stock MAF calibration table, put in an injector constant of 75, set the fuel pressure back to stock, and it run just fine.

Mike
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 03:53 AM
  #11  
Tekprodave's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 526
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by engineermike
What MAF sensor are you running? If it's not stock, then you should be able to install the stocker, complete with screens, and the stock MAF calibration table, put in an injector constant of 75, set the fuel pressure back to stock, and it run just fine.

Mike
If it were only that easy. LOL!!

Stock MAF installed. MAF table has been altered to account for High RPM short commings. 43 is stock pressure but the after market pressure regulator bumps the pressure up when certain conditions are present. With all that you have suggested the PW's stay at 1.3ms. We took about 50% out of the maf tables at low rpm and it helped but only very slightly. The PW's were at .9 but it didn't change the A/F much because I don't think the injector can respond that fast. And that's when it would go crazy lean until the fuel pressure jumps. Easing into the throttle the engine would rev ok but a/f ratios were still about 11.5/1 at 2500 to 3krpm even with a .9 pw. This is observed without a load. I've also tried starting with really low fuel pressure but it doesn't like that either. I'm looking into the latest tunercat and possibly some smaller injectors. I just thought somebody might have a trick I didn't think of yet. Thanks for the help.

Last edited by Tekprodave; Sep 9, 2007 at 03:55 AM.
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 10:22 AM
  #12  
engineermike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
It sounds like you have something else wrong then. My 84's weren't that difficult to get running right. I'll bet you have a bad sensor or injector.

Mike
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 10:28 AM
  #13  
Tekprodave's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 526
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by engineermike
It sounds like you have something else wrong then. My 84's weren't that difficult to get running right. I'll bet you have a bad sensor or injector.

Mike
I have thought about that but what is the most likely one it could be?

It could also be the FPR is bumping the pressure too much and the PCM can't keep up with the changes????
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 11:11 AM
  #14  
engineermike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
You could run an experiment by installing the stock 24's, set the injector constant back to 24, then see how it runs. If it runs fine, then I'd be suspect of the injectors themselves.

Mike
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 11:25 AM
  #15  
Tekprodave's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 526
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by engineermike
You could run an experiment by installing the stock 24's, set the injector constant back to 24, then see how it runs. If it runs fine, then I'd be suspect of the injectors themselves.

Mike
Not a bad idea but I don't have a set of stockers. I've got 36's, 50's, and the 75's. Any best guesses? I'm pretty sure all the sensors are original and the car is 12 years old. What would go out first?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 AM.