Forced Induction Supercharger/Turbocharger

cc306 on a 114 lobe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 26, 2003 | 06:00 PM
  #1  
Mike383LT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 522
From: york pa
cc306 on a 114 lobe

do you guys think a cc306 recut on a 114 lobe seperation is decent for a blower cam
Old Dec 26, 2003 | 06:32 PM
  #2  
boosted-lt1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 657
From: Farmington Hills, MI
I've wondered about this too. It seems it might be a good , agressive cam for larger blowers. Even with a 114 or 115 LSA, there still may be too much draw through though. I'd certainly like to here opinions.
Old Dec 26, 2003 | 08:54 PM
  #3  
engineermike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Any motor benefits from quick ramp rates on a cam. But, blower motors benefit more so than NA. This is because the quick ramp rates have less overlap for any given duration at .050" and LSA.

Also, a supercharged motor benefits from delaying exhaust valve opening due to the higher pressure in the cylinder on the power stroke. However, delaying exhaust valve opening gives less time for the exhaust to escape. Therefore, a quick opening exhaust valve can be delayed and you get more work out of the high pressure gasses, but still get all the exhaust out.

Clear as mud?

That being said, the CC306 is old technology as far as ramp rates are concerned. It takes 30 degrees to get the lifter from .006" to .050". An Extreme grind only takes 26 degrees to go the same distance.

Here's a good comparison of the CC306 intake lobe (3112) and an Extreme lobe (3196) of nearly the same advertised duration:

Duration@.006" .050" .200" Lift
CC306 290 230 143 .510"
3196 288 236 162 .585"

So, even though the Extreme lobe is 2 degrees less seat timing, it is 6 degrees more at .050" and 19 (!) degrees more at .200" lift. The area under the curve of the Extreme lobe is much greater than the 306 lobe, but it will have less overlap (better for supercharger) and idle better. The down side is that you have to carefully set up your valvetrain to handle the quick ramps (140+ lb seat pressure).

If you want something in the range of the 306 114LSA, but using Extreme lobes, you can use 3315 i / 3317 e lobes on a 114. This would be 281/293 advertised, 230/242 at .050", and 151/164 at .200" with .544"/.576" (1.6 rockers). This cam would have the 11 degrees less overlap, the same duration at .050", but 6-8 degrees more duration at .200" than the 306 114LSA while retaining the same lift. Of course, you could go to the high lift lobes and gain even more at .200" and lift.

If you're getting a custom grind, you might as well take advantage of the quick ramps offered by the Extreme lobes.

Mike
Old Dec 27, 2003 | 05:38 AM
  #4  
97WS6SCharged's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,784
From: Jacksonville
Yeah, that's just what I was thinking.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mightymouse383
Parts For Sale
19
Jul 20, 2016 07:34 AM
RUENUF
Cars For Sale
6
Mar 13, 2016 03:37 PM
95chwagon
Parts For Sale
5
Oct 16, 2015 12:24 PM
Z Power
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
Sep 19, 2015 11:19 PM
sideways_Into_3rd
N2O Tech
3
Oct 27, 2002 05:47 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:43 PM.