994rwhp 863rwtq LS1
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 884
From: I reached back like a pimp and smacked that LS1....
994rwhp 863rwtq LS1
We were playing around with our shop car on the dyno and got some new numbers.
994rwhp 863rwtq through a turbo 400 and a full 4 inch exhaust system exiting at the bumper.
This is with a mid frame Innovative 88mm turbo, turbo system built in house.
Sportsman 370ci iron motor. Stock crank, eagle rods, diamond pistons
out of the box AFR 225 heads
LS6 intake, 78mm throttle body
236/242 112lsa cam
22psi boost, 23deg timing, C16 fuel
We are now disassembling the car and building a twin system
Graph -> http://www.ls1speed.com/artwork/turbo/graph2B.jpg
994rwhp 863rwtq through a turbo 400 and a full 4 inch exhaust system exiting at the bumper.
This is with a mid frame Innovative 88mm turbo, turbo system built in house.
Sportsman 370ci iron motor. Stock crank, eagle rods, diamond pistons
out of the box AFR 225 heads
LS6 intake, 78mm throttle body
236/242 112lsa cam
22psi boost, 23deg timing, C16 fuel
We are now disassembling the car and building a twin system
Graph -> http://www.ls1speed.com/artwork/turbo/graph2B.jpg
Re: 994rwhp 863rwtq LS1
Originally Posted by INTMD8
. . .994rwhp 863rwtq through a turbo 400 . . .a mid frame Innovative 88mm turbo . . .236/242 112lsa cam . . .
What, exactly, is a "mid frame" turbo? Is it somewhere between a T4 and T6 exhaust side?
Also, the cam choice is interesting. I've seen some data suggesting that the ever-popular reverse-split turbo cam may not be the hot ticket. What was the logic behind the cam choice?
Mike
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 884
From: I reached back like a pimp and smacked that LS1....
Re: 994rwhp 863rwtq LS1
Originally Posted by engineermike
That's extremely impressive through an unlocked TH400. I think most people discount the difference that makes. I bet it would pick up over 100 hp if it had a 6 speed.
What, exactly, is a "mid frame" turbo? Is it somewhere between a T4 and T6 exhaust side?
Also, the cam choice is interesting. I've seen some data suggesting that the ever-popular reverse-split turbo cam may not be the hot ticket. What was the logic behind the cam choice?
Mike
What, exactly, is a "mid frame" turbo? Is it somewhere between a T4 and T6 exhaust side?
Also, the cam choice is interesting. I've seen some data suggesting that the ever-popular reverse-split turbo cam may not be the hot ticket. What was the logic behind the cam choice?
Mike
The turbo has a T6 inlet, but it's physical size is inbetween a T4 and thumper.
The cam was just some more experimentation, following my general belief that most good naturally aspirated grinds make great turbo cams. ( I do tend to favor single pattern cams on tight LSA's, whereas reverse splits on a very wide LSA seems to be 'trendy')
Re: 994rwhp 863rwtq LS1
Originally Posted by INTMD8
. . .my general belief that most good naturally aspirated grinds make great turbo cams. . .
The spec's are very similar to your LS1 cam, just 2 degrees difference on the intake. However, I think that the 234/242 would put the rpm range higher than the T-76 can support on a 363 cid. Then again, I shifted the Firebird at 6200 and do the same with the turbo 363. . . Hmmm. . .
Mike
Re: 994rwhp 863rwtq LS1
Originally Posted by engineermike
That's funny. Based on a good experience with the GM 847 in a NA motor ('89 Firebird, 11/1 383, AFR 210's out the box, 234/242 "847" cam, Victor Jr., Holley 750, shorty headers and 3" single exhaust) which ran 11.09 at 122.7 mph at full street weight including A/C, me and my friend (a long time Turbo GN guy) have always joked about using that cam in my LT1 turbo motor.
The spec's are very similar to your LS1 cam, just 2 degrees difference on the intake. However, I think that the 234/242 would put the rpm range higher than the T-76 can support on a 363 cid. Then again, I shifted the Firebird at 6200 and do the same with the turbo 363. . . Hmmm. . .
Mike
The spec's are very similar to your LS1 cam, just 2 degrees difference on the intake. However, I think that the 234/242 would put the rpm range higher than the T-76 can support on a 363 cid. Then again, I shifted the Firebird at 6200 and do the same with the turbo 363. . . Hmmm. . .
Mike
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



