shorty headers
With the LT1 short headers do make a significant difference. Here's a picture of the exhaust manifold borrowed from another post:

They look like something from a tractor. The LS1 exhaust casting in contrast is much less restrictive, hence there's not a lot of power to be had by switching to short headers there.

They look like something from a tractor. The LS1 exhaust casting in contrast is much less restrictive, hence there's not a lot of power to be had by switching to short headers there.
alot of it just has to do with the diameter of the primary, if u think about going from a 1-5/8" to 1-3/4 u actually gain a inch in exhaust diameter..... well kinda. i believe the mids are 1-3/4" and are suprisingly equal to the long tubes, dont take my word for it never tried it out.
According to one leading manufacturer their "mid" length headers for the LT1 engine increase horsepower by 7 to 16 (8 - 12 LS1) and middle range torque is improved. Not a lot of new hp but any performance modifications will take advantage of the efficiency of the free flowing exhaust. Headers by themselves make a modest performance contribution. It is in conjunction with other power adders where they're supposed to benefit the most. H/C, n2o and forced induction are crippled with the factory exhaust.
I agree, Mac's have an awesome reputation for fit, quality, and value. They also have about the best plug access of any header. People have reported 20rwhp gains with them. They can't hold you back to much, if you check out www.advancedinduction.com they have a guy making over 400rwhp with them.
Ceramic Coating
We have several customers making 400 RWHP with Macs.
Mac headers
soon after doesn,t cut it . Even the old 10 yrs old Blackjack Alum 5000 on my 79z still look decent.



The increase is 1/8" in diameter.