Drivetrain Clutch, Torque Converter, Transmission, Driveline, Axles, Rear Ends

Auburn rear Vs. LSD

Old Nov 26, 2004 | 09:43 PM
  #1  
YZF/LS1 Freak's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 720
From: Indianapolis
Auburn rear Vs. LSD

I did a search and got nothing. I am getting ready to buy a Auburn clutchless rear with 3.42's off of a buddy that came out of his 96 SS. How are the different from LSD rears???

Sorry I am rear end stupid when it comes to that kind of stuff LOL and this one comes with LCA brackets, a cover, and has 22k miles and I am getting it dirt cheap.
Old Nov 26, 2004 | 10:06 PM
  #2  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Re: Auburn rear Vs. LSD

I'm not sure in what year(s) GM changed what diff's they used, but I *think* the Auburn was used mostly in the earlier (LT1) years, and the Zexel-Torsen was used more in LS1's. I'm sorta basing this on the fact that I've got 2 Auburn diff's that came out of LT1 cars, and I've got a Torsen that came out of my '02.

.....anyways, the Auburn works like a traditional "posi-traction" diff, where you've got springs pushing against the spider gears to try and hold them, and keep the axles turning at the same time/speed. The Torsen type has worm gears that slide back and forth and somehow lock the axles, but will allow 1 wheel to spin still?

.....basically, I don't understand how the _ _ _ _ the Torsen works, and I think I prefer the design of the Auburn.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
camaro98_speed
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
0
Apr 22, 2015 11:26 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 29, 2015 07:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 11, 2015 06:10 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:19 PM.