3:73's or stock ?
3:73's or stock ?
Anyone here know how much better 3:73's do for a 6speed car ?
I dont want to use 410's again , was to many RPM's on the highway for me . So i was wondering what kinda difference 3:73's would make ? anyone ever used 3:73's w/a 6 speed ? I was told it dont make much a difference then 3:42's
I dont want to use 410's again , was to many RPM's on the highway for me . So i was wondering what kinda difference 3:73's would make ? anyone ever used 3:73's w/a 6 speed ? I was told it dont make much a difference then 3:42's
Re: 3:73's or stock ?
Originally posted by robb4964
Anyone here know how much better 3:73's do for a 6speed car ?
I dont want to use 410's again , was to many RPM's on the highway for me . So i was wondering what kinda difference 3:73's would make ? anyone ever used 3:73's w/a 6 speed ? I was told it dont make much a difference then 3:42's
Anyone here know how much better 3:73's do for a 6speed car ?
I dont want to use 410's again , was to many RPM's on the highway for me . So i was wondering what kinda difference 3:73's would make ? anyone ever used 3:73's w/a 6 speed ? I was told it dont make much a difference then 3:42's
Re: Re: 3:73's or stock ?
Originally posted by Omega9
I was told the same thing, didn't make that much of a difference. I would stick with 3:42's.
I was told the same thing, didn't make that much of a difference. I would stick with 3:42's.
My LT1 was going thrue tires in 3500 miles w/410's and you cant stomp it in first it just spins , not to mention my gas milage went to crap
For my 99 Z28 with a few boltons, my 3.42 rear has a whining at 50 mph only on accel, so I'm thinking the teeth on the gears must be wearing down wierd.. So I decided to get 3.73's (Slp has a special that also includes the install kit) to replace em.. (and bought a used cleared hypertech programmer).. Else I would have stuck with the stock 3.42's..
going from 3.42's to 3.73's is only about a 9% gear reduction.. vs. 4.10's would be 20%
Only thing I don't like about the stock gearing is that "dead" zone when starting from a roll.. and the relative dead zone when your below 3000 rpms.. so I'm thinking 3.73's will be just the tweak I want..
Else with 4.10s, I'll be spininng the tires off the line, when I'm powering out of a turn (can already feed too much gas in with 3.42's coming out of a turn!)., and the gears will be a little too short for my taste.. Plus the 4.10's are weak (although there are 4.11's with a differnet tooth count that may be a bit stronger?)
going from 3.42's to 3.73's is only about a 9% gear reduction.. vs. 4.10's would be 20%
Only thing I don't like about the stock gearing is that "dead" zone when starting from a roll.. and the relative dead zone when your below 3000 rpms.. so I'm thinking 3.73's will be just the tweak I want..
Else with 4.10s, I'll be spininng the tires off the line, when I'm powering out of a turn (can already feed too much gas in with 3.42's coming out of a turn!)., and the gears will be a little too short for my taste.. Plus the 4.10's are weak (although there are 4.11's with a differnet tooth count that may be a bit stronger?)
Only thing I don't like about the stock gearing is that "dead" zone when starting from a roll.. and the relative dead zone when your below 3000 rpms.. so I'm thinking 3.73's will be just the tweak I want..
Thats what i was thinking , the dead zone is a good way to put it .
Thats what i was thinking , the dead zone is a good way to put it .
3.73s feel great behind a six-speed. Like the car should've come with them stock.
They weren't a dramatic change, but the car has a little better kick down low (the dead zone you were talking about,) without affecting mileage or highway driving.
They weren't a dramatic change, but the car has a little better kick down low (the dead zone you were talking about,) without affecting mileage or highway driving.
Originally posted by Antz97ZNJ
Id stick w/ the 342's..if you want 6spd gears go for the 410's..but id spend the money elsewhere
Id stick w/ the 342's..if you want 6spd gears go for the 410's..but id spend the money elsewhere
Originally posted by tailwindxr7
3.73s feel great behind a six-speed. Like the car should've come with them stock.
3.73s feel great behind a six-speed. Like the car should've come with them stock.
With the LS1 4.10s would be the better choice, IMO, if you could just get traction in first (and if you don't mind more shifting). If you've ever thought to compare dyno graphs between the LT1 and LS1 you'll notice they're generally dead even on hp and tq at around 3500rpm. Before that the LT1 makes better numbers and after that the LS1 just takes off and pulls like crazy all the way to 6000. After driving mine everyday and driving a few LS1s on dealer lots, in my experience this appears to be right. Taller gears will let you take advantage of that top end power since you have to rev the LS1 to make it happy. Just my $.02
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM



