Potential for LOWER ET's
Potential for LOWER ET's
My first time at the track left me disappointed. But I completely understand why. I couldnt hook up AT ALL on the slippery track, especially with the narrow tires i was running that day.
Does anyone want to take a stab at what kind of 1/4 mile times I may have achieved if I had a 2.0 60' time?
Heres what I had before:
60' - 2.49
1/4 ET - 14.03
MPH - 104.3
I have a K&N filtercharger, shorty headers, flowmaster exhaust, no cat, and a jet stage II module. The car is an M6 with a Star Stage III clutch, and 3.42's. Give me some feedback, let me know what that run might have been if I could drive
Cam -
Does anyone want to take a stab at what kind of 1/4 mile times I may have achieved if I had a 2.0 60' time?
Heres what I had before:
60' - 2.49
1/4 ET - 14.03
MPH - 104.3
I have a K&N filtercharger, shorty headers, flowmaster exhaust, no cat, and a jet stage II module. The car is an M6 with a Star Stage III clutch, and 3.42's. Give me some feedback, let me know what that run might have been if I could drive
Cam -
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alliance12364
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
3
Sep 23, 2015 12:40 PM



