Computer Diagnostics and Tuning Technical discussion on diagnostics and programming of the F-body computers

Very strange situation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2006 | 08:58 PM
  #1  
wicked_95z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,469
From: J-ville,NC
Very strange situation

I'll try and make this as clear as possible. What would cause the pcm to go into power enrich mode before the prescribed % of tps in Tunercat? I can watch my pcm go into pwr enrch mode through datamaster before the prescribed % of TPS for that rpm i.e. @ 3600 rpms it requires 48% tps to enable pwr enrch. According to datamaster, I am in pwr enrch mode at 3600 rpms with only 36% tps. I am trying to track down a stumble both at off idle and while driving
Old Dec 5, 2006 | 02:38 AM
  #2  
VinceTrifecta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 477
From: Seattle area
A bad MAP sensor (or incorrect manifold pressure - e.g. vacuum leak, etc) would cause this since power enrich mode is determined by MAP sensor reading.
Old Dec 5, 2006 | 05:00 AM
  #3  
wicked_95z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,469
From: J-ville,NC
I thought, by looking at tunercat, that PE mode was determined by TPS %.
Old Dec 5, 2006 | 05:32 AM
  #4  
VinceTrifecta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 477
From: Seattle area
It's also partly determined on MAP sensor reading. There's a MAP threshold that has to be exceeded before PE mode is enabled.

What's the MAP sensor reading when the PCM enters PE mode prematurely?

I'd also check to make sure the TPS isn't "glitching". Sometimes when they wear out, they'll spike their readings.
Old Dec 5, 2006 | 08:48 PM
  #5  
wicked_95z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,469
From: J-ville,NC
In line with the example above, @ 3600 rpms the map reading was 103.3 kpa. I also have switched Tb along with a different tps and a different IAC motor. I guess it could be time for a new MAP sensor. I dont think I have ever changed it in the 6 years and 4 motors I've had in the car

Last edited by wicked_95z; Dec 5, 2006 at 08:50 PM.
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 01:31 AM
  #6  
VinceTrifecta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 477
From: Seattle area
103.3 is definitely "WOT"
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 08:33 AM
  #7  
Sweetred95ta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,193
From: High Ridge, MO
36% tps and a MAP reading of 103.3 kPa is definitely not right. vgeglia is correct, that is WOT. Are you sure you didn't read the barometric pressure of the atmosphere instead of the pressure on the inside of the intake?
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 02:03 PM
  #8  
wicked_95z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,469
From: J-ville,NC
I was looking at the map reading cell on datamaster right under the rpm reading
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 02:20 PM
  #9  
Sweetred95ta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,193
From: High Ridge, MO
Do you have a log? I'd like to see it.

Sweetred95ta@hotmail.com
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 06:53 PM
  #10  
wicked_95z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,469
From: J-ville,NC
Email sent
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nayr
LT1 Based Engine Tech
7
Mar 3, 2023 08:34 PM
RUENUF
Cars For Sale
6
Mar 13, 2016 03:37 PM
93 RedBird
Fuel and Ignition
4
Nov 15, 2015 08:24 AM
tdigger9899
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
9
Sep 7, 2015 10:56 AM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Aug 7, 2015 08:52 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:15 AM.