Computer Diagnostics and Tuning Technical discussion on diagnostics and programming of the F-body computers

PE % change to Fuel/Air ratio vs coolant temp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 03:42 AM
  #1  
F6's Avatar
F6
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 165
From: Lengede
PE % change to Fuel/Air ratio vs coolant temp

I have read that some fellows set their PE % change to Fuel/Air ratio vs coolant temp to "0"

Can I take the percentage from "coolant temp" and add it to PE % change to Fuel/Air ratio vs RPM without changing my AFR???

My AFR is set to 13.0-13.2 at WOT and would want to keep it there.
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 09:13 AM
  #2  
bobdec's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 910
You did not provide you year and model info.. I will answer using my setup..For an OBD1 using TunerCat $EE you can select help - calibration help - tables - % Change to AFR to view this information. The AFR at WOT is determined by the following formula " WOT AFR = 14.7 / (1 + %Change vs Cool/100 + %Change vs RPM/100) " Therefore if you 'zero' out the AFR vs coolant table settings then the AFR vs RPM settings will control the WOT AFR. This simplifies making changes as you only have to alter one table not two when tuning. EG. with AFR vs RPM setting for 5200 RPM at 13 and AFR vs coolant zereo'ed out, WOT AFR = 14.7/ (1 + 0 + (13/100)) = 14.7/1.13 = 13.0 AFR. OR setting of 11.3 = 14.7/1.113 = 13.2 AFR. So by zero'ing out the coolant table the RPM table selects the AFR. But then you give up the option of running a richer PE AFR when the engine is cold. You need to understand the implications.

Last edited by bobdec; Jul 22, 2009 at 09:22 AM.
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 10:01 AM
  #3  
F6's Avatar
F6
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 165
From: Lengede
bobdec, thanks for the quick reply.
Yes, I have OBD1 and I'm using TunerCat ECM DA2 with BLM locker. It's a 1992 LT1.
I know the formula but wasn't sure if it really would work. I'll check it out with my wideband just to make sure after I make changes.

You know, I'm sorting out all the issues I have one at a time. Ever since I changed to the bigger cam, cam surge is my biggest problem. Maybe I'll just start a new thread and ask for more help.

BTW, anyone stepping on the gas pedal in such a manor (WOT) while the engine is cold isn't very smart.
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 11:01 AM
  #4  
Hal Fisher's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 798
From: San Jose, CA
They should have a table for %Change to F/A ratio vs IAT at WOT, that would be much more usefull.

Hal
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 03:35 PM
  #5  
F6's Avatar
F6
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 165
From: Lengede
but they don't
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AlaskaZ28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
9
Jan 1, 2015 12:30 PM
brentbrowning01
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
15
Dec 16, 2014 06:35 AM
chevroletfreak
LT1 Based Engine Tech
202
Jul 4, 2005 05:00 PM
91Bird305
Midwest
6
Aug 8, 2002 12:36 AM
stevil
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
20
Jul 15, 2002 03:06 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 PM.