http://docmudge.tripod.com/tunercatsnapshots/index.html

It will take awhile to load, but I have the MAF tables in there with everything else. That should be from a 95 file which I remember being the same as 94, LT1 Camaro stuff not WS6... If they are any different it would be interesting to know, I know its been discussed before but I just dont remember.

 

Either I have don't have the right info or I'm really confused.

The WS6 information that I have is lower than the Info that Doc posted.

Example:
WS6 @ 1488 Hz = 2.36
LT1 @ 1488 Hz = 2.45

I attempted to see if there was any set increase across the board but I couldn't find any % that it increased by.

Hopefully I just have the wrong data for the WS6 because if I don't I am really confused.

I have it all in an excel doc so let me know if anyone wants it.

 

Hey guys,
i use to be on that LT1 mailing list and i got a program off it that lock the BLMs at 128. but i have yet to see someone talk about it on here. anybody use this?
I use this in colaberation with about a 9% increase in the MAF tables. feels much stronger

 

Thats Christian's BLM Locker, I know of it and I remember when he came up with it, but I never tried it since I ended up open loop tuning.

 

Nothing to go too nuts over, 3.7% difference versus the 8-10% most of the gutted MAF folks are using.

 

I just don't understand why a WS6 would use lower values.

I agree its not worth worring over it peaks out at a little over a 10% difference at the very end.

 

Oh the WS6 has lower values? Interesting...hmm

Oh, you will find that 8% is about the max you can go at the very end, the limit is something like 520.