Computer Diagnostics and Tuning Technical discussion on diagnostics and programming of the F-body computers

can someone diagnos these scans please?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 05:33 PM
  #1  
luckyou03's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,076
From: Memphis, TN
can someone diagnos these scans please?

My car seems to have power, starts up fine, idles fine for about 1 minute and shuts off fine but if I idle in "Drive" for more than the length of a red light, it throws a check engine light and dies. It dies at almost every red light now with SUCKS.

I just took a few scans and if you can see if anything is wrong I'd appreciate it.

Started with cold startup and you can see the time Progress as the car idles:






Turned the car off.

Started it back up, let idle for 1 minute:




Took it for a short drive and let get into closed loop:



Thanks

Last edited by luckyou03; Apr 23, 2008 at 05:36 PM.
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 06:28 PM
  #2  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
When the SES light comes on, what codes are set? I'll bet you get DTC 44 and DTC 64.

Why not use the "logging" capability and post the log on a free FTP site, so that it can be reviewed more easilly, and in depth.

Your O2's are reading extremely lean, and its pouring fuel into the engine. The 160 BLM's are adding 25% extra fuel over what the PCM thought it should be using. The 194 INT's (not sure why your scan labels it "O2 sel") are adding 50% more fuel on top of that. In effect, your PCM is supplyingalmost twice as much fuel as it would normally calculate.

Does it appear to be running rich - actually reaking of unburned fuel? That would definitely cause it to die. And it should be setting codes for lean readings on both O2 sensors. If its running that rich, there's something wrong with the O2 sensors. They should not hang at numbers of 100mV and below.

Also appears to heat up the coolant very slowly. Either that, or the constant low readings from the O2 sensors is causing it to take a long time to go into closed loop. You shouldn't have to drive it to make that happen.

If its a "false lean" condition that causing the excess fueling, do not run it any more than you have to. The excess fuel will wash the lubrication off the cylinder walls, destroying the rings, then dilute the oil to the point where you start hammering bearings.

If its a "true lean", you need to look for a huge vacuum leak, extremely high fuel pressure, incorrect valve adjustment, or screwed up tune. Who tuned it? Do you still have stock injectors? The MAP looks a bit high, possibly indicating problems with the valve adjustment or the tune.
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 07:00 PM
  #3  
luckyou03's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,076
From: Memphis, TN
Originally Posted by Injuneer
When the SES light comes on, what codes are set? I'll bet you get DTC 44 and DTC 64.

Why not use the "logging" capability and post the log on a free FTP site, so that it can be reviewed more easilly, and in depth.
Should I log the car while driving it or idling?

Originally Posted by Injuneer
Your O2's are reading extremely lean, and its pouring fuel into the engine. The 160 BLM's are adding 25% extra fuel over what the PCM thought it should be using. The 194 INT's (not sure why your scan labels it "O2 sel") are adding 50% more fuel on top of that. In effect, your PCM is supplyingalmost twice as much fuel as it would normally calculate.

Does it appear to be running rich - actually reaking of unburned fuel? That would definitely cause it to die. And it should be setting codes for lean readings on both O2 sensors. If its running that rich, there's something wrong with the O2 sensors. They should not hang at numbers of 100mV and below.
Yes I smell unburnt fuel

Originally Posted by Injuneer
Also appears to heat up the coolant very slowly. Either that, or the constant low readings from the O2 sensors is causing it to take a long time to go into closed loop. You shouldn't have to drive it to make that happen.

If its a "false lean" condition that causing the excess fueling, do not run it any more than you have to. The excess fuel will wash the lubrication off the cylinder walls, destroying the rings, then dilute the oil to the point where you start hammering bearings.

If its a "true lean", you need to look for a huge vacuum leak, extremely high fuel pressure, incorrect valve adjustment, or screwed up tune. Who tuned it? Do you still have stock injectors? The MAP looks a bit high, possibly indicating problems with the valve adjustment or the tune.
I personally believe it's the 02 sensors. I'll check for a vaccum leak, but wouldn't that cause a really high idle? The tune was done by pcm4less. The valve were set about 10k miles ago and have locking screws and this is fairly recent problem.

The engine sounds perfect for about a minute and then it just chokes on itself, shakes hard and dies.

Thank you for your help, I will change the 02's and add fresh oil and go from there.

Last edited by luckyou03; Apr 23, 2008 at 07:04 PM.
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 07:24 PM
  #4  
luckyou03's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,076
From: Memphis, TN
btw this will be the second set of bosch 02 sensors I've gone through in 1 year.
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 07:48 PM
  #5  
dookie454's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 573
Try to notice if it dies when it goes into closed loop... this would be a sure sign of bad 02's since they are reading very lean would make the computer add alot of fuel.

AFter that, try simply unplugging your 02's, this will make it stay in open loop. If it continues to run great in open loop then thats' one more reason to blame the 02's.
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 08:14 PM
  #6  
luckyou03's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,076
From: Memphis, TN
Originally Posted by dookie454
Try to notice if it dies when it goes into closed loop... this would be a sure sign of bad 02's since they are reading very lean would make the computer add alot of fuel.

AFter that, try simply unplugging your 02's, this will make it stay in open loop. If it continues to run great in open loop then thats' one more reason to blame the 02's.
The car doesn't start dying until it warms up. I'm looking at buying Denso brand o2's right now.
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 11:33 PM
  #7  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Why don't you just buy the OEM AC/Delco (now Delphi) O2 sensors that your engine was designed to use? Many people have had problems with brands other than AC/Delco.
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 11:59 PM
  #8  
luckyou03's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,076
From: Memphis, TN
the Denso are $70 for 2, the ACDelco are $144.00 for 2
Old Apr 24, 2008 | 07:00 AM
  #9  
shoebox's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 27,725
From: Little Rock, AR
Originally Posted by luckyou03
btw this will be the second set of bosch 02 sensors I've gone through in 1 year.
I would definitely try the Delphi or AC-Delcos.
Old Apr 24, 2008 | 11:16 AM
  #10  
luckyou03's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,076
From: Memphis, TN
With the money I wasted on 2 sets of bosch I think I will spend the extra cash for a set of AC-Delco.
Old Apr 24, 2008 | 11:25 AM
  #11  
stereomandan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,620
From: Saginaw, Michigan
Yes, it's hard to tell from the snapshot in time, but it appears that the O2's are reading extrememly lean. Your BLMs are maxed out as well. Another indicator of the O2's thinking it's running lean.

Dan
Old Apr 24, 2008 | 01:46 PM
  #12  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Originally Posted by luckyou03
the Denso are $70 for 2, the ACDelco are $144.00 for 2
OK.... you save $74, you replace them every 6 months, and your engine doesn't run right.

What's wrong with this picture?

Did you try the online source for GM parts, linked on Shoebox's site?

http://shbox.com/1/4th_gen_tech2.html#Dal_and_Jason
Old May 9, 2008 | 05:52 PM
  #13  
luckyou03's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,076
From: Memphis, TN
"If its a "false lean" condition that causing the excess fueling, do not run it any more than you have to. The excess fuel will wash the lubrication off the cylinder walls, destroying the rings, then dilute the oil to the point where you start hammering bearings."

I stopped driving the car after I read this post and I just finished replacing my 02's. I just checked the oil to and you were right. I actually saw clean fuel drain out of my oil pan for maybe a half second. some of the oil looked milky. I could definately tell it was gasoline. Hopefully these new 02's will solve my problems.
Old May 9, 2008 | 06:50 PM
  #14  
luckyou03's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,076
From: Memphis, TN
......
Old May 9, 2008 | 06:51 PM
  #15  
luckyou03's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,076
From: Memphis, TN
Alright new o2's are in, fresh oil is in and the car is still running like junk.

Here is a log that I saved: http://www.lt1engine.com/temp/logcomm.txt

Here are 3 more screen shots:

http://www.lt1engine.com/temp/7.gif
http://www.lt1engine.com/temp/8.gif
http://www.lt1engine.com/temp/9.gif



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 AM.