93 OBD-I to 96 OBD-II Conversion?
#1
93 OBD-I to 96 OBD-II Conversion?
Hello all!
Anyhow, Man I'm getting tired of removing the damn PCM everytime I want to tune my 93 Z28. And with speed density, I assure you I've removed that damn PCM about a hundred times pin pointing the VE and Spark tables
I've heard of something for us Chip guys to Flash program our chips without removing them, but don't want to spend the money on that. And since everyone is on the OBD-I conversion train, I figured I could get an OBD-II PCM cheap. And I have a complete OBD-II wiring harness.
Anyone see any problems with doing this? Here are somethings I'm taking into consideration, feel free to bring up any points
1. No MAF, but I can run Speed Density.
2. Intake manifold. 94+ Have the fuel cross-over tube, this might be a neccesity with having sequential injection.
3. Software. TunerCAT is suppose to be releasing OBD-II Def Files
That's all I can think of at the moment and at this point the pros out weigh the cons and I'm close to doing it, I just wanted to know what everyone thought.
Anyhow, Man I'm getting tired of removing the damn PCM everytime I want to tune my 93 Z28. And with speed density, I assure you I've removed that damn PCM about a hundred times pin pointing the VE and Spark tables
I've heard of something for us Chip guys to Flash program our chips without removing them, but don't want to spend the money on that. And since everyone is on the OBD-I conversion train, I figured I could get an OBD-II PCM cheap. And I have a complete OBD-II wiring harness.
Anyone see any problems with doing this? Here are somethings I'm taking into consideration, feel free to bring up any points
1. No MAF, but I can run Speed Density.
2. Intake manifold. 94+ Have the fuel cross-over tube, this might be a neccesity with having sequential injection.
3. Software. TunerCAT is suppose to be releasing OBD-II Def Files
That's all I can think of at the moment and at this point the pros out weigh the cons and I'm close to doing it, I just wanted to know what everyone thought.
#3
I to have thought about doing this. Nice to have Lt1 edit so you done have to remove the computer. However, you arel osing part of the tunability of having a obd 2 computer, by not have the 4l60-e, so you cant adjust your shift points and stuff like you could on a 94 and up car, unless you bit the bullet and bought a 4l60-e. might want to up the injectors while your at it also. I was about to do the swap, then decided to just get my own chip burning set up so that I could do everything myself. If you wanna try it, I say go for it. Let me know the results if you do.
#4
I think you'll have to convert the timing set or something to add the crank position sensor.
You'll have to have a different knock sensor (100k ohm instead of the one you have now).
You might have to change fuel rails
If you want it to run in closed loop, you'll need a MAF
Since you're not running the e-version of the tranny (4L60E), you'd probably need a PCM or at least a tune from a manual car, but I'm not sure.
You'll have to have a different knock sensor (100k ohm instead of the one you have now).
You might have to change fuel rails
If you want it to run in closed loop, you'll need a MAF
Since you're not running the e-version of the tranny (4L60E), you'd probably need a PCM or at least a tune from a manual car, but I'm not sure.
#5
96TurboTA: I just talked to TC today. They will be releasing their OBD-II version TC and Def Files in 2 weeks!
badblackta: I don't care about shift points, I shift manually at the track and my shift points are adjusted manually at the throttle body And injectors would not matter much in this case since my 93 came with 24#...oh I have 30# SVOs in anyhow.
LWillmann: I haven't gotten much into it, but I know the car won't run with out a CS working. I'm sure there is some way to bypass that. Maybe with the new TC. The car ill run in closed looped with no MAF.
Again, this is all just a thought. The only reason is to tune easier since I'm a tuning nut! Ah well, just something I thought I'd throw out there. I'll let you guys know what happens.
badblackta: I don't care about shift points, I shift manually at the track and my shift points are adjusted manually at the throttle body And injectors would not matter much in this case since my 93 came with 24#...oh I have 30# SVOs in anyhow.
LWillmann: I haven't gotten much into it, but I know the car won't run with out a CS working. I'm sure there is some way to bypass that. Maybe with the new TC. The car ill run in closed looped with no MAF.
Again, this is all just a thought. The only reason is to tune easier since I'm a tuning nut! Ah well, just something I thought I'd throw out there. I'll let you guys know what happens.
#7
Originally posted by ZPaul2Fresh8
LWillmann: I haven't gotten much into it, but I know the car won't run with out a CS working. I'm sure there is some way to bypass that. Maybe with the new TC. The car ill run in closed looped with no MAF.
LWillmann: I haven't gotten much into it, but I know the car won't run with out a CS working. I'm sure there is some way to bypass that. Maybe with the new TC. The car ill run in closed looped with no MAF.
As far as I know, the PCM will enter closed loop without the MAF functioning.... can't think of any reason it would be necessary to avoid closed loop without the MAF. "speed-density" is simply another way to measure mass air flow.
#9
Originally posted by badblackta
well last time I checked 93s had 22 lb injectors but those 30 lb svos will definitely get the job done
well last time I checked 93s had 22 lb injectors but those 30 lb svos will definitely get the job done
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tdigger9899
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
9
09-07-2015 10:56 AM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
08-07-2015 08:52 AM