Classic Engine Tech 1967 - 1981 Engine Related

engine problems not running right

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 16, 2003 | 06:36 AM
  #16  
SLO SS K2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 105
From: Lake Zurich, IL, USA
Yo' Freak, WORD!

It SHOULD be in the oil pan if he can't see it on the head.

Talk to the guy who rebuilt the engine. He'll tell you it's not his fault but let him know anyway. I know that what yau say can happen but I've never heard that happening to some one.

For the retorque on the rockers.

I hate saying this, but make sure the engine can't start disconnect the coil wire or something.

There is a sequence to tighten them but I find that its mentally easier to do each cylinder at a time. tighten all of the rocker arms so that there is no slop in them, Like finger tight with a wrench. On cyl. # 1, bump the engine so that either on of the the valves is wide open. The other valve will (should) not have any pressure on the it. On the valve that has no pressure tighten it until you can't move the pushrod up and down. (This is a finesse trick so I'm betting on some additional players to add to this.) bump the engine so that the opposite valve arrangement happens. Repeat for the remaining cylinders. (Bet you cheat)

You may want to check everything a second time.

when you are happy with these adjustments, spin the engine over and make sure that oil is coming out of all the pushrods. Check for slop again as the lifters may change at this point.

With a helper you can start the engine now. Do not let your partner rev the engine, here you want a very low idle.
Do not attempt this in an attached garage. That is, a garage that is attached to your house.

As soon as you start the car you are going to know which valves need adjusting first. torque them down just so they quit clacking.

Start at one valve and loosen it until it starts ticking. torque it down slowly to allow the lifter to bleed down with it. When it's not clicking anymore, torque it 1/4 to 1/2 turn more allowing the lifter to bleed down. IT IS BETTER TO HAVE A TICK THAN TO HAVE A VALVE THAT DOESN'T SEAT. Repeat until done.

You're prolly going to have a very smokey car at this point. MOST of the oil made it back to the pan but I'm guessing too much hit the headers.

If I missed anything or you have an EASIER way please add it in. We are all here to learn.

SPK
Old Sep 18, 2003 | 03:48 AM
  #17  
black84 z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 37
another thing to think about is if that lifter left its bore you would have lost the motor due to no oil pressure...a good investment is them oil valley trays from moroso...saved my motor in my 84 when the rocker snapped and the pushrod was hopping around doing nothing
Old Sep 18, 2003 | 07:40 PM
  #18  
jons69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 106
From: Norman,OK
fixed it

well I just replaced that one pushrod for now anyway. With the engine running I went around all the rockers and tightened them down till they quit making noises. Man I had engine oil everywhere. But it runs fine now. I am thinking about taking the original 307 from my car and putting the crank and pistons into the 350 that is in it right now. What do you all think, or should I worry about getting body work done to it.Comments
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 06:20 AM
  #19  
SLO SS K2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 105
From: Lake Zurich, IL, USA
Congrats on the repair.

Why do you want to switch the rotating assembly? If you are going to go to all the trouble of that you might as well get nice new 4130 stuff and forged pistons. If you do decide to swith you are going to need everything machined. That means pulling the engine and sending the block out to be freshened up anyway. At that point you might as well be putting junk yard parts into a new block. Uh, how deep are you pockets? Since you have a new rotating assembly you're gonna need a new cam, might as well go with a roller cam, then you'll need roller lifters and 16 new pushrods as they will probably be too long. Then with all that niceness you might as well get aluminum roller rockers. Then you might as well get new heads and maybe fuel injection or a new manifold and Carb.

Can I make a very sincere suggestion. Sit down and draw up your plans including costs before you turn the first bolt. After you have decided exactly what you are going to do. Do that. Do not change your mind mid-stream. I am speaking from experience on this. After spending thousands off dollars on an engine for my 67. I have decided I should have gone with a new crate motor. They are inexpensive and the best part, gaurenteed. Put a crate motor in, check for pressure and temp and take it up to 6000 RPM out of the box. If it scatters, not a big deal. Try that with your brand new engine that YOU put together.

Oh yeah, be sure all the mechanicals are perfect before you get it painted. Put painting in the list after everything but interior. I have a whole lot of chips in my brand new paint from doing things backward. If you want to know what not to do ask me. Email is fine spking@hewitt.com
Sorry for any misspelled words

Last edited by SLO SS K2; Sep 19, 2003 at 06:24 AM.
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 05:51 PM
  #20  
jons69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 106
From: Norman,OK
The reason I want to change the rotating assembly is becouse it should be a lot faster than what it is. In Texas it ran a consecutive 15.8 in the quarter mile. That sucks. Somebody told me that putting in a smaller crank would created tons of more horsepower, true or false. My pockets are pretty shallow right now, i am kinda leanin towards the body and paint as of right now. Its been a pretty reliable engine to me so far...knock on wood!
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 06:25 PM
  #21  
Freak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 446
From: Lincoln Park, MI US
smaller crank = more HP? smaller meaning lighter, or shorter stroke?

lighter will give you a bit more power, because of less parasitic loss. but its not worth the cost unless you have everythign else matched optimaly, and you are just looking for that extra oomph.... also if the engine is together already it will be a fairly major project to do, and much more power can be had doing other, much less involved mods.

a shorter stroke (327 vs 350 for example) isnt realy specific enough. it is possible to make more horsepower with a shorter stroke, given the same components otherwise, because a shorter stroke will usualy be able to spin faster, but this will be at the expense of low end torque. also the smaller displacement will "see" the cam as bigger, and therefore the powerband will shift slightly higher. but again the gain will be fairly minimal, and can be easily made up with otehr less complicated mods if you stick with the stock rotating assembly

bottom line, unless the bottom end needs a rebuild, or you are planning on building a motor anyway, stick with the stock shortblock and put some good components on it. itll be easier and youll be plenty happy untill time to build one from the ground up...
Old Sep 21, 2003 | 05:10 PM
  #22  
jons69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 106
From: Norman,OK
Thanks

I just wanted to thank everybody who helped me getting my camaro back on the road. You guys really have a lot of information. Thanks again. Jon
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dirtybird81
Fuel and Ignition
10
Jan 6, 2015 09:31 PM
97SSdude
LT1 Based Engine Tech
9
Dec 31, 2014 07:43 PM
Jazsun
Cars For Sale
0
Dec 29, 2014 12:14 PM
nophix
Fuel and Ignition
3
Nov 30, 2014 10:26 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 PM.