Cannot Decide On What CAM!!!
Cannot Decide On What CAM!!!
Hello Folks. I need some help deciding which cam to go with.
For a 1964 Chevelle SS, mostly show. I want the car to run hard, but not run into low vacuum or overall overheating, or plain and simple, PROBLEMS.
Motor:
-355
-11.1 compression
-Pro Action 220cc heads
-Victor Jr Intake, or RPM Air Gap, have both.
Car has a turbo 350, with an EDGE Performance 3000 Stall, 3:55 rear end gears. 1 5/8 long tubes, electric fans, blah blah blah.
Here are the contenders:
Comp Magnum 286 (230/230 .570 110)
Comp XE (230/236 .510/.520 110)
ThumpeR Series (227/241 .513/.498 107)
What do you guys recommend? Thank You A MILLION!
For a 1964 Chevelle SS, mostly show. I want the car to run hard, but not run into low vacuum or overall overheating, or plain and simple, PROBLEMS.
Motor:
-355
-11.1 compression
-Pro Action 220cc heads
-Victor Jr Intake, or RPM Air Gap, have both.
Car has a turbo 350, with an EDGE Performance 3000 Stall, 3:55 rear end gears. 1 5/8 long tubes, electric fans, blah blah blah.
Here are the contenders:
Comp Magnum 286 (230/230 .570 110)
Comp XE (230/236 .510/.520 110)
ThumpeR Series (227/241 .513/.498 107)
What do you guys recommend? Thank You A MILLION!
Guest
Posts: n/a
I agree also that the cam selection of the three is on the large side, you may also want to consider a slightly smaller cam due to the weight of your vehicle. If you go with that much cam, you may loose the grunt required to get that big chevelle moving and keep it running at peak power. Out of the three the Comp XE (230/236 .510/.520 110) had the best numbers on a simulation that I ran, but a slightly smaller cam actually made your car a little quicker in a simulated 1/4 mile.
My 10.6:1 minirammed 385 with that Comp XE 230/236 but with a 112 lobe separation angle:
http://www.ws6transam.org/transamidle.wav
Works nice, has 381 RWHP on a Mustang Dyno, which is about 460 to 480 at the crank. You'd like it. It's a little torque shy under 2000 RPM but peaks on torque at 4000 RPM and runs to 6300 RPM before falling off.
850 RPM idle. about 12 to 14 inches of vacuum.
http://www.ws6transam.org/transamidle.wav
Works nice, has 381 RWHP on a Mustang Dyno, which is about 460 to 480 at the crank. You'd like it. It's a little torque shy under 2000 RPM but peaks on torque at 4000 RPM and runs to 6300 RPM before falling off.
850 RPM idle. about 12 to 14 inches of vacuum.
Those are pretty big heads. I wonder why you are limitng your choices to those cams? What rpm do you want this thing to run to? That converter with 3.55's is going to keep you from using a cam to really complement those heads, IMHO. I'd ise a smaller cam unless you are willing to change the gear and/or converter, but you will be leaving some of the hp available from the heads on the table.
Rich
Rich
Those are pretty big heads. I wonder why you are limitng your choices to those cams? What rpm do you want this thing to run to? That converter with 3.55's is going to keep you from using a cam to really complement those heads, IMHO. I'd ise a smaller cam unless you are willing to change the gear and/or converter, but you will be leaving some of the hp available from the heads on the table.
Rich
Rich
If its just a show car and all out performance isnt mandatory,I'd use the ThumpR camshaft you have listed.
Those heads are pretty big,that thing needs some 3.73's and definately use the air gap over the single plane IMO.
Those heads are pretty big,that thing needs some 3.73's and definately use the air gap over the single plane IMO.


