Classic Engine Tech 1967 - 1981 Engine Related

350 crank in 327

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 1, 2003 | 11:23 PM
  #1  
96LT14u2Nv's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 980
From: batavia, ohio
350 crank in 327

will this work? does it need any machining? any performance gains? does it need new connecting rods. does n e one know if a 65 327 is a 2 bolt main or 4 bolt main. give me the low down guys!
Old Jul 2, 2003 | 02:58 AM
  #2  
71RSZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 13
From: Kaneohe, Hawaii
As I recall, all 327's came with 2-bolt mains. Not sure if it's even possible to drop a 350 crank into a small-journal 327 block.
Old Jul 2, 2003 | 12:47 PM
  #3  
angel71rs's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,209
From: TX
65 327 has smaller main and rod journals that 350, so you'd have to have them turned way down. Unless you can find a 67 350 crank; I think those were small journal type. 327 rods use smaller rod bolts, 11/32 vs 3/8, so would not be desirable over 350 rods. Yes you would get a power increase, but not worth the hassle, IMO. Just build the 327 or find a 350 rebuildable core. All 327's were 2 bolt.
Old Jul 2, 2003 | 10:35 PM
  #4  
Greed4Speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,507
From: FTW, TX
Just build that 327 like you would a 350 and it'll run like a 350. 327's have a better rod length to stroke ratio than the 350's.
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 12:13 AM
  #5  
96LT14u2Nv's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 980
From: batavia, ohio
thanks for the help u guys.
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 03:18 PM
  #6  
kacy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 256
From: IL
Originally posted by 71RSZ28
As I recall, all 327's came with 2-bolt mains. Not sure if it's even possible to drop a 350 crank into a small-journal 327 block.

are you sure
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 05:27 PM
  #7  
2x4's Avatar
2x4
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 39
From: Kalamazoo-home of...nothing.
A 350 crank in a 327 block would give you a 350.
305/350 stroke= 3.48
327/307 stroke=3.25
327/350 bore=4.00

http://www.mortec.com/borstrok.htm
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 11:07 PM
  #8  
71RSZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 13
From: Kaneohe, Hawaii
Originally posted by kacy
are you sure
I'm sure about the 2-bolt 327's.

As for the crank, like I said, I'm not sure. He has a '65 327 block that was cast with the intention of using a 3.25" stroke 327 crank. That block might not have enough clearance for the counterweights on the 3.48" stroke 350 crank. It could probably be ground for clearance, but that can create its own problems.

Like angel71rs said, the main and rod journals will have to be cut down (I believe all 350's were medium-journal) .150 and .100 respectively. That is a SEVERE cut. Add it up and it's a lot of machine work (costly).

The later 327's used the same block casting as the 350's, and were machined for medium-journal cranks, so no problem there.
Old Jul 4, 2003 | 11:15 AM
  #9  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Actually the hot setup would be a 283 crank in the 327 yielding a 302. However the 283 crank is slightly different than the true 302 crank used in the MO 2-bolt main Z/28 motors in 1967, the difference being the crankshaft flange. Of course if you're truly going for a retro 302 you'd also need domed top pistons. The 68-69 302's used a different crank with a 2.10-in Rod Journal/ 2.45-in Main Journal, compared to 2-inch & 2.3-in for the 283 and '67 302.

The 327's also came with different crankshafts as well. For 65-67 they had the same 2.00-in/2.30-in Rod/Main sizes as the 283 & 302, then went followed with a 2.10-in/2.45-in Rod/Main in 68 & 69. Both series had a 3.25-in Stroke.

The 67, and 68-68 350's used different crankshafts, however they were both 3.48-in/2.10-in/2.45-in (Stroke/Rod/Main).

Now here's the thing though... in 1967, block casting #3892657 was used for the 302, 327 and 350 in most Camaros. Some '67 327's came with #3903352 in mid to late 1967. In 1968, block casting #3914578 was used for the 302, 327 and 350. (At least one '68 327 used #3914660.) Some 307's even used the same block casting in 1968. In 1969 when the 4-bolt 350 came into play, #3956618 was used for both 2-bolt and 4-bolt 350's and also the 4-bolt DZ 302.

So basically for the most part, a small block Chevy is a small block Chevy, and depending on the crank and machining done, you can pretty much make one into whatever you want. (Just avoid the POS '69 307's... they're useless.)

So as 2x4 said... a 350 crank in a 327 block would make it into a 350. Yes its possible, however you can do so much more with a 327 than that. (In fact in 1967 the 350 was sometimes referred to as a "revised stroke 327".)

(No I didn't memorize all this.... Chevrolet by the Numbers, 1965-69 a great book I highly recommend for 1st gen owners.)

Last edited by jg95z28; Jul 4, 2003 at 11:31 AM.
Old Jul 4, 2003 | 01:37 PM
  #10  
71RSZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 13
From: Kaneohe, Hawaii
Originally posted by jg95z28


Now here's the thing though... in 1967, block casting #3892657 was used for the 302, 327 and 350 in most Camaros. Some '67 327's came with #3903352 in mid to late 1967. In 1968, block casting #3914578 was used for the 302, 327 and 350. (At least one '68 327 used #3914660.) Some 307's even used the same block casting in 1968. In 1969 when the 4-bolt 350 came into play, #3956618 was used for both 2-bolt and 4-bolt 350's and also the 4-bolt DZ 302.

So basically for the most part, a small block Chevy is a small block Chevy, and depending on the crank and machining done, you can pretty much make one into whatever you want. (Just avoid the POS '69 307's... they're useless.)

So as 2x4 said... a 350 crank in a 327 block would make it into a 350. Yes its possible, however you can do so much more with a 327 than that. (In fact in 1967 the 350 was sometimes referred to as a "revised stroke 327".)
All true, but 96LT1's question dealt with a '65 327 block. IN HIS CASE, that means a different casting from any 350 block, one not that might not be clearanced for a longer stroke crank (and might not be able to be clearanced). Just making the point that not all 327 blocks are the same.
Old Jul 4, 2003 | 02:51 PM
  #11  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
You know I totally missed that part. In any case, in 1965 the 327's came with either nodular bearing caps, and if it was a 300HP block or higher it should have chamfered main bearings. The bore/stoke/rod/main dimensions were the same from 1965-67 so with some machining anything is possible.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dylan1303
Cars For Sale
6
Aug 12, 2015 02:00 AM
jj_burchiel
Classic Engine Tech
2
Mar 13, 2015 11:20 PM
ModdedNerd
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
12
Dec 18, 2014 10:52 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:23 PM.