Coaxials then?
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 119
From: Bartlett, Illinois
Coaxials then?
Thanks for the response man Ive been hoping someone answered this question for a while. So any other opinions on coaxials, components or mid ranges? Thanks for all the help everyone.
CMC
CMC
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,858
From: OHIO Go Buckeyes!
Co-ax: OK for a budget systems
Comps: The best way to go IMO for your main front speakers.
Mids: Only for rear fill (not really necessary in a well setup front imaging setup). If you absolutely have to have rear speakers, band pass them from 80Hz to about 250Hz.
Comps: The best way to go IMO for your main front speakers.
Mids: Only for rear fill (not really necessary in a well setup front imaging setup). If you absolutely have to have rear speakers, band pass them from 80Hz to about 250Hz.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 119
From: Bartlett, Illinois
I mean for the rear.
This should have been a reply to my other post but this will work to. I will have Alpine components up front, I want to fill the back but i dont know with what. Should I use mid ranges? if so what kind? or should i use alpine compontents or coaxials?
Thanks for the help.
CMC
Thanks for the help.
CMC
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,858
From: OHIO Go Buckeyes!
Start by NOT having any rear speakers at all and see what you think. If you're happy with that setup you just saved yourself some $. If in the end you feel you absolutely have to have rear speakers then go with a set of mids crossed over as mentioned above. You can power them off of your HU. You won't need another amp for the rears.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post