Winter Solstice
Re: The car will be a success
Originally posted by jrp4uc
I'm amazed .3 seconds is what's preventing it from becoming a "fun" car in some of your eyes. Needless to say, the Miata has succeeded for over 14 years while offering even less "fun." And that is the competition for this model. It certainly is not short of the performance marks of the current Miata and MR2. Hopefully it can close in on the $13k more expensive S2000 with the SC/Turbo version.
But that is to say a car like this is measured purely by acceleration statistics, which is absurd. Yes, it has to move, but there's a lot more that adds to the level of entertainment.
If you live your life a "quarter mile at a time" and stop light to stop light, this probably isn't going to be the car for you--even if it could reach 60 a tick faster. That type of buyer certainly won't spell its demise. With reasonable sales expectations, I don't see why the car would tail off or be a disappointment after a couple years.
I'm amazed .3 seconds is what's preventing it from becoming a "fun" car in some of your eyes. Needless to say, the Miata has succeeded for over 14 years while offering even less "fun." And that is the competition for this model. It certainly is not short of the performance marks of the current Miata and MR2. Hopefully it can close in on the $13k more expensive S2000 with the SC/Turbo version.
But that is to say a car like this is measured purely by acceleration statistics, which is absurd. Yes, it has to move, but there's a lot more that adds to the level of entertainment.
If you live your life a "quarter mile at a time" and stop light to stop light, this probably isn't going to be the car for you--even if it could reach 60 a tick faster. That type of buyer certainly won't spell its demise. With reasonable sales expectations, I don't see why the car would tail off or be a disappointment after a couple years.
I never said the car is measured purely by straight-line acceleration. It IS however, a big factor.
Solstice is actually a bit faster than the V6 Fieros--most rags were getting 8.0 to 8.5 out of them back then. Fiero 4's were 10.5-11.0. I owned both a 4 and a 6, and neither were fast cars.
Also interesting to note Fieros sold 100K units the first year--seems like it harvested the whole market in one shot with the slow version, which was probably not the best strategy. 20-30K Solstices a year allows GM to whet the appetite and then bring out a faster version later for people who are more serious.
Still, given the ongoing upgrades in horsepower, it would be very, very, very, very nice if the base Solstice had 0-60 #s that started with a 6. No fun to be beaten by a Honda minivan in your new sports car.
And if the "hot" Solstice only has 205 HP, someone should be shot at GM.
Also interesting to note Fieros sold 100K units the first year--seems like it harvested the whole market in one shot with the slow version, which was probably not the best strategy. 20-30K Solstices a year allows GM to whet the appetite and then bring out a faster version later for people who are more serious.
Still, given the ongoing upgrades in horsepower, it would be very, very, very, very nice if the base Solstice had 0-60 #s that started with a 6. No fun to be beaten by a Honda minivan in your new sports car.
And if the "hot" Solstice only has 205 HP, someone should be shot at GM.
All well and good.....BUT, in the age of high horsepower...anything in the 100 range "sounds" weak....
I've posted this car on our local ricer (youth) boards and they ALL call 170 weak...even though it's probably more than they currently roll with....but they love the styling.
I love this car, don't get me wrong, BUT GM has shot themselves in the foot more often than not on this very issue....let's not repeat the Fiero debacle.....
Hell, I'd personally seriously consider one of these...but I'll want mid 200 hp levels or look elsewhere.....
I've posted this car on our local ricer (youth) boards and they ALL call 170 weak...even though it's probably more than they currently roll with....but they love the styling.
I love this car, don't get me wrong, BUT GM has shot themselves in the foot more often than not on this very issue....let's not repeat the Fiero debacle.....
Hell, I'd personally seriously consider one of these...but I'll want mid 200 hp levels or look elsewhere.....
Originally posted by Z28x
That price is just an estimate, GM hasn't set the official price yet. I don't think it will be $18,000 either, maybe $18,995 that way it is still in the $18K range.
That price is just an estimate, GM hasn't set the official price yet. I don't think it will be $18,000 either, maybe $18,995 that way it is still in the $18K range.
Originally posted by Z28x
Your right, Solstice will be faster. The $26K MR2 does 0-60 in 8.5sec accourding to motortrend. The more expensive Miata that people over 5'8" can't fit in does 0-60 in the 8.0 range.
Solstice will also have more torque than the S2000 that cost almost $15,000 more
Your right, Solstice will be faster. The $26K MR2 does 0-60 in 8.5sec accourding to motortrend. The more expensive Miata that people over 5'8" can't fit in does 0-60 in the 8.0 range.
Solstice will also have more torque than the S2000 that cost almost $15,000 more
Originally posted by Z28x
Not every one wants/needs a quarter mile monster, the 170HP should compete fine in its segmant. Don't forget is will also compete with other low end verts like the Sebring and V6 Mustang. 7.2 is still quicker than the avg daily driving that most people have. For those that like the Solstice but want more, they will have to wait for the Solstice GXP.
Not every one wants/needs a quarter mile monster, the 170HP should compete fine in its segmant. Don't forget is will also compete with other low end verts like the Sebring and V6 Mustang. 7.2 is still quicker than the avg daily driving that most people have. For those that like the Solstice but want more, they will have to wait for the Solstice GXP.
Geez, people. 170 hp will be plenty for the base roadster. My brother's '90 Miata has 116 hp (iirc), and it is a lot of fun. These little roadsters are fun for reasons other than raw acceleration (wind in the hair, nimble handling, etc.). Even with only 116 hp, my brother's car can get out of its own way (only weighs 2100 lbs or so).
Besides, I'm fairly sure that the upper level version will be packing considerably more than the 205 hp speculated here...
Besides, I'm fairly sure that the upper level version will be packing considerably more than the 205 hp speculated here...
Thank you Guy 
People, we're talking about a $20K roadster in base trim, not a holy grail. IMO, 0 - 60 in 7.2 seconds is just fine for its main market. New adults will be trading in their used Miatas or V6 Mustangs and go to this and totally be blown away. Not only that, this car is a lot more than just a pocket rocket, its going to be somewhat of a boulevard cruiser. Just driven around to get some looks. I'm sure the aftermarket for the car will be huge. I'm sure the top level Solstice will hit 60 in well under 6.8 seconds. Chill out and remember that you get what you pay for.

People, we're talking about a $20K roadster in base trim, not a holy grail. IMO, 0 - 60 in 7.2 seconds is just fine for its main market. New adults will be trading in their used Miatas or V6 Mustangs and go to this and totally be blown away. Not only that, this car is a lot more than just a pocket rocket, its going to be somewhat of a boulevard cruiser. Just driven around to get some looks. I'm sure the aftermarket for the car will be huge. I'm sure the top level Solstice will hit 60 in well under 6.8 seconds. Chill out and remember that you get what you pay for.
I've been following the Solstice since the beginning, and I still remember the first article I saw about it. Hp for the supercharged version was to be 240, and performance figures were 4.7 0-60 and 13.2 in the quarter- I'm guessing the ecotec engine is coming out with a roots-type under the hood? Anyway, it remains to be seen if GM can actually keep close to those figures, the main problem most likely being weight, the production model could get heavier if certain parts of the chassis have problems, or if they decide the level of boost is too much and they don't want to risk having to do too much warranty work they might only come out with a tad over 200 hp. But if they do I'm sure that the serious buyers will just go out and buy a smaller pulley.
As much as it would irritate me to have one of those and having to worry about being beat by a four cylinder, it makes me happy to know that there's something at GM that I would actually consider buying other than a Corvette.
All they need to do now is unveil a new Camaro and I might actually be pleased with GM (if it doesn't look retarded).
As much as it would irritate me to have one of those and having to worry about being beat by a four cylinder, it makes me happy to know that there's something at GM that I would actually consider buying other than a Corvette.
All they need to do now is unveil a new Camaro and I might actually be pleased with GM (if it doesn't look retarded).
Originally posted by GreenDemon
I've been following the Solstice since the beginning, and I still remember the first article I saw about it. Hp for the supercharged version was to be 240, and performance figures were 4.7 0-60 and 13.2 in the quarter-
I've been following the Solstice since the beginning, and I still remember the first article I saw about it. Hp for the supercharged version was to be 240, and performance figures were 4.7 0-60 and 13.2 in the quarter-
Originally posted by PaperTarget
I'm not saying it won't be fun, just not as fun as what's out there (if you pay more). I think it'll do well though compared to other roadsters.
I'm not saying it won't be fun, just not as fun as what's out there (if you pay more). I think it'll do well though compared to other roadsters.
Originally posted by PaperTarget
I'm not saying it won't be fun, just not as fun as what's out there (if you pay more).
I'm not saying it won't be fun, just not as fun as what's out there (if you pay more).
There has to be a starting point, and the solstice is right on with it's starting point.
Originally posted by guionM
As far as the Solstice's engine & performance, you guys need to be realistic & lighten up....ALOT!
Solstice is already going to be the quickest car in it's class by far as has already been pointed out. The Solstice is also going to cost UNDER $20,000. Miata has just 140 horses and is nearly $22,000 in base form....and it's currently the cheapest in it's class!!
At 7.2 seconds 0-60, it's about as quick as base Camaros & Firebirds were, and slightly quicker than the now defunct base SN95 Mustangs.
Solstice is shaping up to be a great car for the price and it's purpose. If it came in the coupe that was displayed at the 2002 Detroit show, I'd even consider one (and get a dealer installed supercharger).
Unless you want a SRT-4, Solstice is one hell of a bargain compared to it's competitors.
As far as the Solstice's engine & performance, you guys need to be realistic & lighten up....ALOT!
Solstice is already going to be the quickest car in it's class by far as has already been pointed out. The Solstice is also going to cost UNDER $20,000. Miata has just 140 horses and is nearly $22,000 in base form....and it's currently the cheapest in it's class!!
At 7.2 seconds 0-60, it's about as quick as base Camaros & Firebirds were, and slightly quicker than the now defunct base SN95 Mustangs.
Solstice is shaping up to be a great car for the price and it's purpose. If it came in the coupe that was displayed at the 2002 Detroit show, I'd even consider one (and get a dealer installed supercharger).
Unless you want a SRT-4, Solstice is one hell of a bargain compared to it's competitors.
i am more than sure there will be tuners lined up for miles trying to sell you a hotter engine for the Solctice. that's not the problem. I and I'm sure others expected a much lighter car (and we all know weight isn't something that mods well). its a whale next to the small Japanese roadsters it is being compared to. basically, where's this car's edge?
Last edited by morb|d; Apr 27, 2004 at 08:52 PM.


