Why does Chevy waste money on Nascar
#61
TV ratings have been up, fan attendance has been down.
http://www.jayski.com/pages/tvratings2008.htm
http://www.jayski.com/pages/tvratings2008.htm
#62
Why does anybody waste money on Nascar? It's a bunch of cars that go in a circle. Nothing changes. The only cool thing is when a huge accident happens. In the 60's-80's, Nascar meant something. Now, like in an earlier post, it's all about the drivers, and the Tampax/Enzyte/Viagra/Tide stickers on the cars. Besides, the Toyota looks identical to the Ford, which looks identical to the Chevy.
#63
Why does anybody waste money on Nascar? It's a bunch of cars that go in a circle. Nothing changes. The only cool thing is when a huge accident happens. In the 60's-80's, Nascar meant something. Now, like in an earlier post, it's all about the drivers, and the Tampax/Enzyte/Viagra/Tide stickers on the cars. Besides, the Toyota looks identical to the Ford, which looks identical to the Chevy.
Being a long time Impala fan, I don't mind that Chevy is using the Impala name on the cars now. But the current Impala is nothing like the racecar, but it is time to evolve.
Just like everybody else, I would like to see more differentiation and more modern technology. Electronic fuel injection and independant rear suspension would be nice.
I wish there were a way to bring back Trans-AM racing with production-based racecars. There is stupid money going into NASCAR. There has to be some to spare to go toward a different more modern series. Maybe put more of an emphasis on fuel economy along with the racing?
Here is what I would like to see:
- Limit the quantity of fuel that a team can use during a race.
- Limit the tire size to width and height of tire used in actual production model.
- Race on tracks with more turns so that aerodynamics don't matter near as much.
- Must begin with a production body-in-white.
- Limit raceweight.
- Engine must be the same displacement as production model +/- X%.
- Drivetrain must be of similar design of production model.
- Production version must make up at least 10% of actual vehicle production.
I have to get to class. I'll expand later, but this is a good start.
#64
i stayed outta this thread for awhile, but ima **** off a few people anyway since im bored.
why does chevy waste money on building the camaro? apprently sub30mpg sports cars are selling better than 40+mpg small cars.
why does chevy waste money on building the camaro? apprently sub30mpg sports cars are selling better than 40+mpg small cars.
#65
Because Camaro is a real car?
Because any good press Camaro gets directly affects sales because it's press over a real car?
Because it's a vehicle you can actually buy?
I dunno. Because NASCAR is none of the above?
#66
FYI ... a pretty good read from the Peter.
http://www.autoextremist.com/fumes1/
1fastdog - you happen to know if anything he's saying is true?
Everyone else --
Just for a debatable point, what if Nascar was able to all the safety benefits of the COT, and put them under a stock-dimensioned (not stock bodied though) Camaro, Mustang, Challenger?
Thanks
Chuck
http://www.autoextremist.com/fumes1/
1fastdog - you happen to know if anything he's saying is true?
Everyone else --
Just for a debatable point, what if Nascar was able to all the safety benefits of the COT, and put them under a stock-dimensioned (not stock bodied though) Camaro, Mustang, Challenger?
Thanks
Chuck
Last edited by Chuck!; 08-06-2008 at 11:47 AM.
#68
FYI ... a pretty good read from the Peter.
http://www.autoextremist.com/fumes1/
1fastdog - you happen to know if anything he's saying is true?
Everyone else --
Just for a debatable point, what if Nascar was able to all the safety benefits of the COT, and put them under a stock-dimensioned (not stock bodied though) Camaro, Mustang, Challenger?
Thanks
Chuck
http://www.autoextremist.com/fumes1/
1fastdog - you happen to know if anything he's saying is true?
Everyone else --
Just for a debatable point, what if Nascar was able to all the safety benefits of the COT, and put them under a stock-dimensioned (not stock bodied though) Camaro, Mustang, Challenger?
Thanks
Chuck
#69
FYI ... a pretty good read from the Peter.
http://www.autoextremist.com/fumes1/
1fastdog - you happen to know if anything he's saying is true?
Everyone else --
Just for a debatable point, what if Nascar was able to all the safety benefits of the COT, and put them under a stock-dimensioned (not stock bodied though) Camaro, Mustang, Challenger?
Thanks
Chuck
http://www.autoextremist.com/fumes1/
1fastdog - you happen to know if anything he's saying is true?
Everyone else --
Just for a debatable point, what if Nascar was able to all the safety benefits of the COT, and put them under a stock-dimensioned (not stock bodied though) Camaro, Mustang, Challenger?
Thanks
Chuck
I like taking the Cup drivers out of the Busch/Nationwide Series. It has basically turned into a practice race for Cup.
I don't like getting rid of the truck series. Of course I drive a truck and live in Texas.
Honestly I don't see the big issue about the CoT all looking alike. Their production counterparts all look the same also...
#70
The part in bold made me think about something. How close are the ever tightening rules making NASCAR more like the old IROC series? In that series it really was all about the driver since each had "identical" racecars.
Being a long time Impala fan, I don't mind that Chevy is using the Impala name on the cars now. But the current Impala is nothing like the racecar, but it is time to evolve.
Just like everybody else, I would like to see more differentiation and more modern technology. Electronic fuel injection and independant rear suspension would be nice.
I wish there were a way to bring back Trans-AM racing with production-based racecars. There is stupid money going into NASCAR. There has to be some to spare to go toward a different more modern series. Maybe put more of an emphasis on fuel economy along with the racing?
Here is what I would like to see:
I have to get to class. I'll expand later, but this is a good start.
Being a long time Impala fan, I don't mind that Chevy is using the Impala name on the cars now. But the current Impala is nothing like the racecar, but it is time to evolve.
Just like everybody else, I would like to see more differentiation and more modern technology. Electronic fuel injection and independant rear suspension would be nice.
I wish there were a way to bring back Trans-AM racing with production-based racecars. There is stupid money going into NASCAR. There has to be some to spare to go toward a different more modern series. Maybe put more of an emphasis on fuel economy along with the racing?
Here is what I would like to see:
- Limit the quantity of fuel that a team can use during a race.
- Limit the tire size to width and height of tire used in actual production model.
- Race on tracks with more turns so that aerodynamics don't matter near as much.
- Must begin with a production body-in-white.
- Limit raceweight.
- Engine must be the same displacement as production model +/- X%.
- Drivetrain must be of similar design of production model.
- Production version must make up at least 10% of actual vehicle production.
I have to get to class. I'll expand later, but this is a good start.
#71
What I really want to see is stuff in my car taking on stuff i n the other guys car then reading about MY <insert year and make here> benefiting from a bunch of guys going around in a circle beating the hell out of production based components.
#73
GAC? http://www.acronymfinder.com/GAC.html ???
I'm interested, but there just isn't much coverage of those series...
I'm interested, but there just isn't much coverage of those series...
#74
Last edited by bossco; 08-06-2008 at 09:47 PM.
#75
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F'n1996Z28SS
Cars For Sale
8
08-23-2023 11:19 PM
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
10-31-2016 11:09 AM
[Exterior] BMW & Mercedes can look like 5th gen Camaro
Husbarn
2010 - 2015 Camaro Interior, Exterior, Paint & Body, Electronics/Car Audio
3
03-30-2015 11:45 AM
formula79
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
18
07-01-2002 02:39 PM