Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

What do you hate the most about your Camaro?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 27, 2003 | 09:09 PM
  #31  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
It's not faster stock for stock than a 03 Cobra
Old Jul 27, 2003 | 09:32 PM
  #32  
96LT14u2Nv's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 980
From: batavia, ohio
the cat hump sucks, the gas mileage sucks and i HATE the salad shooters. that is about all.
Old Jul 27, 2003 | 09:36 PM
  #33  
cmc's Avatar
cmc
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 681
From: Houston, TX USA
Hah. No cupholders at all on the '87.
Old Jul 27, 2003 | 10:26 PM
  #34  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally posted by stevem
gas tank too small
That's a bit of a problem too. It's not as bad as my Mustang was, but I'd still like to see the next Camaro have at least an 18 gallon tank like the GTO will have.
Old Jul 28, 2003 | 01:01 AM
  #35  
0toinsanein5.4sec's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,381
lol a few more, the cup holder, err cell-phone holder is somewhat useless. and also the v6 plastic wheels God i hate those.
squeek wise, mine is generally fine but my bros 2000 sSS's rear suspension squeaks a lot.
Old Jul 28, 2003 | 08:32 AM
  #36  
redzed's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,954
I just figured out why my left side power window seems so slow. I nearly always lower the windows simulateously - just before removing the T-tops - and the left one takes forever. If I just lower the left side by itself, it works quickly enough.

What we're seeing is some sort of voltage drop when both window motors are deployed simultaneously. Problem? Nah, just a "charming" excentricity.
Old Jul 28, 2003 | 02:17 PM
  #37  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Ok... I drove the 95 today and have a few more....

it only has one cupholder...

and, that annoying rattle in the dash that won't go away!
Old Jul 28, 2003 | 02:36 PM
  #38  
PacerX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,979
Mine's fairly rattle free... I think.

Can't hear any rattles over an open exhaust.

Let's see.... what else...

Oh yeah...

Mine's black. I won't buy black again - WAY too much work.


Ummmm....
I like the flip-out cupholder. With an M6 the center console one is worthless. Holds a 55 gallon drum of Pepsi, I mean a Big Gulp, just fine.


Ummmm....
Piston slap and oil consumption are two annoying, but not horrific, problems. Cat hump sucks - I've thought serously about pounding it out.


Ummm....
The Hurst shifter BLOWS. So do the clutch hydraulics. I experienced great joy when ripping both out.

I can forgive the 10-bolt, but I can't forgive the fact that it was not an 8.5" 10-bolt.

That's about it.

Last edited by PacerX; Jul 28, 2003 at 02:38 PM.
Old Jul 28, 2003 | 03:59 PM
  #39  
jrp4uc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,724
From: Hebron, KY
Without reading other posts (I'm sure these are common)...

Lowlights from my '93 Formula ownership experience:
-optispark
-excessively long plastic nose
-engine half-hidden
-huge dash
-hatch rattle
-bulbs always going out
-cheap center console
-wheel design
-stock 235 tires
-poor gearing and 115mph speedo

oh yeah:
-huge doors

Just so it's not all bad news, I did like:
-LT1 power
-6-way adjustable seat
-smooth, though long shifts
-exhaust note

Last edited by jrp4uc; Jul 29, 2003 at 12:02 PM.
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 09:15 AM
  #40  
CLEAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,574
From: Arlington, Texas
I didn't have nearly as many complaints until I got a CTS, but just the same stuff as everybody else. The ride, compared to a modern chassis, is horrific. Oh and also the hump...CTS has TRUE DUALS that run down the driveshaft tunnel like C5, w/ LS1 style pup cats. F5 MUST follow suit and rid the car of that passenger side exhuast routing. Other than that, I really feel that a modern platformed F5 will address most if not all of the mentioned complaints. I simply cannot describe how great feeling this new car is. I can assure all of you that all of your concerns about ride, rattles, and stiffness will be addressed w/ a modern chassis. My main concern is that GM doesn't go cheap on the interior plastics and the leather.
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 09:33 AM
  #41  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Originally posted by CLEAN
I simply cannot describe how great feeling this new car is. I can assure all of you that all of your concerns about ride, rattles, and stiffness will be addressed w/ a modern chassis. My main concern is that GM doesn't go cheap on the interior plastics and the leather.
I felt the same way after the puchase of the new Monte SS!

This is why I stand by my statement that there is nothign wrong with the current F-Body Formula. It just needs to be brought forward two decades in support, quality, design and engineering.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CARiD
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Jan 14, 2015 04:00 AM
4586
Parts For Sale
2
Jan 3, 2015 07:22 PM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
2
Dec 7, 2014 06:01 PM
LastChance719
New Member Introduction
1
Dec 3, 2014 07:55 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Dec 3, 2014 12:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 PM.