Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

What is Cerberus' say in GMs 0% financing on 07 trucks?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 10:14 AM
  #1  
GTOJack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 976
From: SE MI
What is Cerberus' say in GMs 0% financing on 07 trucks?

I dont know. Thats why I phrased it in a question. Cerberus owns 51% of GMAC. GM is offering 0% up to 60 months on extended cab and crew cab full size pickups. Is there a clause that states Cerberus has to go along with free financing when GM decides to move a product or does GM have to pay Cerberus for loss of revenue?
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 10:42 AM
  #2  
Threxx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 4,320
From: Memphis
GM has to 'pay' for 0%, in effect, anyway. I mean it's money lost either way, so my guess is that they do have to pay the other shareholders of GMAC for the lost revenues, and probably from a financial standpoint they may even pay themselves (their own ownership in GMAC) just to keep the records straight.
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 10:44 AM
  #3  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Does he have to go along with 3.9% or 5.9%? I don't see how 0% should be any different. He doesn't run the company, he just owns 51% of it.
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 10:49 AM
  #4  
R377's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,712
From: Ontario
GM would have to negotiate with GMAC and pay them a fair value for the incentive.

It's actually always worked that way, even before GM sold out to Cerberus. That's why for years GMAC reported huge profits while GM-NAO lost money. I suspect that in the past there was a bit of shell game going on to inflate the incentive value paid to GMAC, and hence pad their profit (IMO). Now that half of GMAC is gone away, the values would have to be realistic.
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 01:52 PM
  #5  
mastrdrver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,817
From: O-Town
I thought that GM still owned 51% of GMAC's car borrowing division?
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 02:45 PM
  #6  
96_Camaro_B4C's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,650
From: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted by mastrdrver
I thought that GM still owned 51% of GMAC's car borrowing division?
Or more. I thought the part that Cerberus bought was primarily focused on the mortgage side, not the vehicle loans side...

Old Jul 31, 2007 | 02:59 PM
  #7  
Threxx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 4,320
From: Memphis
Regardless of what GM owns - even when they owned it all, GM would still have to pay GMAC a negotiated rate for those incentives to keep their books straight. GM and GMAC are treated as financially separated companies by the books, so there are no charity cases or else magically GMAC starts looking like it's losing its *** and GM looks like it's doing better than it really is.
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 03:01 PM
  #8  
R377's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,712
From: Ontario
Originally Posted by mastrdrver
I thought that GM still owned 51% of GMAC's car borrowing division?
Nope, they have just 49%. Cerberus got the controlling interest, which in theory will help them get away from GM's junk bond borrowing status. When you have over $200 billion in debt, every point counts. GM has an option after so many years to repurchase a controlling instance. And yes this includes the car loan business. My memory is fuzzy but I think it was the commercial mortgage business that GM initially sold off before Cerberus bought interest in the rest of GMAC.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kandied91z
Midwest
0
Sep 30, 2015 11:43 PM
jackpawt883
LT1 Based Engine Tech
7
Sep 10, 2015 08:53 PM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Aug 7, 2015 08:52 AM
Collinjacobfowl
Midwest
0
Jul 30, 2015 09:35 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jul 29, 2015 08:10 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:33 PM.