Trunk or ?
Trunk or ?
I know Ive been for a trunk on the 5th gen in the past. Ive got to admit though the Torana hatch is pretty cool if it doesnt cost the car the 1/4 windows. Where is the Torana btw? with Alpha comming up Id figure this would be a pretty important concept.
http://www.exoticcarsite.com/image.p..._concept-6.jpg
http://www.exoticcarsite.com/image.p..._concept-6.jpg
If it's going to remain a notch back, imagine cleaning the back glass....it looks like it might be harder to clean than the 4th gen windshield since the top of the headrest and the ceiling will be tight.
and one thing that i hear was the forth gen was hard "to live with everyday" but it hauled a$$ and look how that worked. GM wants the new one to be "more user friendly" but when the trunk opening is way too small it kinda takes away from the "user friendliness" that they are trying to achieve. i like the hatchback in my 97. if i was to get a 5th gen i'd need to get another car just for when i need to do anything with it...other than hauling a$$. not very user friendly in my book.
and one thing that i hear was the forth gen was hard "to live with everyday" but it hauled a$$ and look how that worked. GM wants the new one to be "more user friendly" but when the trunk opening is way too small it kinda takes away from the "user friendliness" that they are trying to achieve. i like the hatchback in my 97. if i was to get a 5th gen i'd need to get another car just for when i need to do anything with it...other than hauling a$$. not very user friendly in my book.
If cargo space if that big a priority, then perhaps a sports coupe/car isn't what you need.
and one thing that i hear was the forth gen was hard "to live with everyday" but it hauled a$$ and look how that worked. GM wants the new one to be "more user friendly" but when the trunk opening is way too small it kinda takes away from the "user friendliness" that they are trying to achieve. i like the hatchback in my 97. if i was to get a 5th gen i'd need to get another car just for when i need to do anything with it...other than hauling a$$. not very user friendly in my book.
Last edited by 5thgen69camaro; May 7, 2007 at 11:42 AM.
anyway.. the trunk on the concept.. the pictures i've seen of it open, didn't look completely useless to me... sure not a huge trunk.. but far from ueseless
as far as the opening goes, it probably is a bit worse than that.. you can see on the Monte Carlo that the trunk lid goes down from to the bumper.. whereas on the camaro.. it doesnt go down from the top hardly at all...
the lift-over height to get stuff in the trunk is gonna be a bit high as well... i wonder if they'll lower it to the bumper.. maybe include at least the inside taillights in the trunklid... would make a much larger opening for stuff... but might ruin the look.. we'll see when the production car comes out
the lift-over height to get stuff in the trunk is gonna be a bit high as well... i wonder if they'll lower it to the bumper.. maybe include at least the inside taillights in the trunklid... would make a much larger opening for stuff... but might ruin the look.. we'll see when the production car comes out
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Aaront810
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
13
Aug 29, 2020 09:34 PM
squarehead
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
0
Nov 21, 2014 08:02 PM



