SVT Lightning Cancelled - Big Rumor?
Re: SVT Lightning Cancelled - Big Rumor?
Originally Posted by IREngineer
And BTW, this is rumor so far and the "Tomcat" is still on...
Re: SVT Lightning Cancelled - Big Rumor?
Originally Posted by Big Als Z
BS! Id rather have a 502 big block over a hemi that I have to lash the valves every day.
Re: SVT Lightning Cancelled - Big Rumor?
The 200R4 was actually a pretty good trans. Ask around to transmission shops, and they will all tell you that the 700R4, in stock form, was a POS. Note that I was talking about them in trucks............ not in 3400lb cars.
Another good friend of mine was a GM truck engineer at the AZ proving grounds for 18 years (just had to retire due to MS............ and has been fighting GM for 2 years to try to get the money that they owe him. GM is refusing to pay him because he does not have a letter from SS stating that he will not get SS. The problem is that SS no longer issues the letter, you get a phone call only. How dare SS change a policy without checking with GM first.
anyway.......... another story........... another day). We had extensive conversations with him about transmissions, and he told us the story of the 700R4. It seems that GM received alot of letters from transmission shop owners, thanking GM for making such a POS trans.......... as it made them alot of money.
At this time, I lived about 5 miles from the AZ Proving grounds (the one by Williams AFB (now Williams Gateway Airport), which is now closed).
Nowhere did I state that the Ford transmissions were great. Quite to the contrary, as I said the 4R70W had no business being in a performance application, and the AOD had its own set of problems due to the 2-piece main shaft. PS diesels had problems with the TC on the 4R100.......... and when you blow the lock-up converter, it takes out the whole trans. I personally have very little experience with Fords FWD transmissions. You have to understand what drove down Highway 95 in Nevada. The majority of it was 3/4-1-ton trucks towing something (typically 5th wheels). Thus, that is where the majority of our tows came from. There are some very hard pulls close to where our shop was, which caused extreme temperatures in these transmissions, and the problems we saw.
That said, GM is still living on the greatness of the TH350 and TH400's reputation. It is well known in the industry that modern GM transmissions are no better, nor no worse than anyone elses. Just like recent Chrysler transmissions are not problematic like their older ones used to be (excluding the 727 which was a very good trans). In this modern era, economies of scale mean that GM transmissions are going to be relatively cheap to purchase, thus it makes them a very smart deal for a smaller manufacturer to buy (rather than spending the enormous R&D needed to develop their own).
BTW, the 4L80E could in no way handle the torque that the proposed Lightning engine was going to put out............ as we are probably talking around 550lb ft. The only transmissions out there that can are the Ford 5R110 and the Allison 1000 (very similar to each other). The problem I can see is that these type of transmissions are not built for high rpm use. Thus, upgrading........... potentially expensive upgrading, may be necessary.
Of course, this is just my experience and opinion.......... I may be wrong.
Another good friend of mine was a GM truck engineer at the AZ proving grounds for 18 years (just had to retire due to MS............ and has been fighting GM for 2 years to try to get the money that they owe him. GM is refusing to pay him because he does not have a letter from SS stating that he will not get SS. The problem is that SS no longer issues the letter, you get a phone call only. How dare SS change a policy without checking with GM first.
anyway.......... another story........... another day). We had extensive conversations with him about transmissions, and he told us the story of the 700R4. It seems that GM received alot of letters from transmission shop owners, thanking GM for making such a POS trans.......... as it made them alot of money. At this time, I lived about 5 miles from the AZ Proving grounds (the one by Williams AFB (now Williams Gateway Airport), which is now closed).
Nowhere did I state that the Ford transmissions were great. Quite to the contrary, as I said the 4R70W had no business being in a performance application, and the AOD had its own set of problems due to the 2-piece main shaft. PS diesels had problems with the TC on the 4R100.......... and when you blow the lock-up converter, it takes out the whole trans. I personally have very little experience with Fords FWD transmissions. You have to understand what drove down Highway 95 in Nevada. The majority of it was 3/4-1-ton trucks towing something (typically 5th wheels). Thus, that is where the majority of our tows came from. There are some very hard pulls close to where our shop was, which caused extreme temperatures in these transmissions, and the problems we saw.
That said, GM is still living on the greatness of the TH350 and TH400's reputation. It is well known in the industry that modern GM transmissions are no better, nor no worse than anyone elses. Just like recent Chrysler transmissions are not problematic like their older ones used to be (excluding the 727 which was a very good trans). In this modern era, economies of scale mean that GM transmissions are going to be relatively cheap to purchase, thus it makes them a very smart deal for a smaller manufacturer to buy (rather than spending the enormous R&D needed to develop their own).
BTW, the 4L80E could in no way handle the torque that the proposed Lightning engine was going to put out............ as we are probably talking around 550lb ft. The only transmissions out there that can are the Ford 5R110 and the Allison 1000 (very similar to each other). The problem I can see is that these type of transmissions are not built for high rpm use. Thus, upgrading........... potentially expensive upgrading, may be necessary.
Of course, this is just my experience and opinion.......... I may be wrong.
Re: SVT Lightning Cancelled - Big Rumor?
Originally Posted by 94LightningGal
BTW, the 4L80E could in no way handle the torque that the proposed Lightning engine was going to put out............ as we are probably talking around 550lb ft. The only transmissions out there that can are the Ford 5R110 and the Allison 1000 (very similar to each other). The problem I can see is that these type of transmissions are not built for high rpm use. Thus, upgrading........... potentially expensive upgrading, may be necessary.
Of course, this is just my experience and opinion.......... I may be wrong.
Of course, this is just my experience and opinion.......... I may be wrong.

Yukon XL 3/4-ton models provide unparalleled power with their optional Vortec 8100 V8 (L18). Its 340 hp at 4200 rpm and 455 lb-ft (617 Nm) of torque at 3200 rpm out-muscles even the top competitor's V10. The Vortec 8100 now mates to a new, heavier-duty 4L85-E version of the previously standard 4L80-E four-speed automatic transmission. The 4L85-E provides higher durability and handles more torque for even better off-line acceleration and launch capability. It also handles more torque in reverse gear. The 4L85-E can handle 460 lb-ft (624 Nm) of maximum engine torque, 20 lb-ft more than the 4L80-E. Design enhancements include:
A more robust overdrive roller clutch, featuring larger diameter rollers and a "shuttle car" design; it allows high-speed 4-2 downshifts without any shift sequencing delays and is designed with error-proof assembly features
A more durable turbine shaft; the shaft is induction-hardened using an electrical heat-treating process and then shot-peened to relieve internal stresses in the metal
Brazed blades inside the torque converter; they allow the torque converter to accept and transfer higher torque levels and increase durability
More pinion gears (five total), allowing the gearset to handle higher loads
In other respects, the 4L85-E has the same gear ratios and design features as the 4L80-E. That means operators get the benefit of GM's Tow/Haul mode, for example, which reduces shift busyness and wear when pulling a heavy trailer. It also means they get the proven dependability and smoothness inherent in the 4L80-E's basic design.
The 4L80-E, which continues to be standard with the Vortec 6000 V8 (LQ4) in Yukon XL 3/4-ton models, also provides increased durability by adopting the more robust overdrive roller clutch and stronger turbine shaft used in the 4L85-E. The 4L80-E handles 440 lb-ft (597 Nm) of maximum engine torque capacity. The transmission is so strong, smooth and dependable that it's even used in such applications as medium-duty trucks, motorhomes and some of the world's most expensive luxury cars.
A more robust overdrive roller clutch, featuring larger diameter rollers and a "shuttle car" design; it allows high-speed 4-2 downshifts without any shift sequencing delays and is designed with error-proof assembly features
A more durable turbine shaft; the shaft is induction-hardened using an electrical heat-treating process and then shot-peened to relieve internal stresses in the metal
Brazed blades inside the torque converter; they allow the torque converter to accept and transfer higher torque levels and increase durability
More pinion gears (five total), allowing the gearset to handle higher loads
In other respects, the 4L85-E has the same gear ratios and design features as the 4L80-E. That means operators get the benefit of GM's Tow/Haul mode, for example, which reduces shift busyness and wear when pulling a heavy trailer. It also means they get the proven dependability and smoothness inherent in the 4L80-E's basic design.
The 4L80-E, which continues to be standard with the Vortec 6000 V8 (LQ4) in Yukon XL 3/4-ton models, also provides increased durability by adopting the more robust overdrive roller clutch and stronger turbine shaft used in the 4L85-E. The 4L80-E handles 440 lb-ft (597 Nm) of maximum engine torque capacity. The transmission is so strong, smooth and dependable that it's even used in such applications as medium-duty trucks, motorhomes and some of the world's most expensive luxury cars.
The 4l80/5E isn't as far off as you think. It shares a lot with the TH-400, which has been proven behind MUCH more than 550 ft*lbs of torque.
Also, maybe Ford needs to take some notes from Mercedes, and the auto that they put behind their TT V12. That engine makes 738 ft*lbs of torque!
Re: SVT Lightning Cancelled - Big Rumor?
Originally Posted by PacerX
Uhhh... no. Ford has a pretty substantial history of transmission failures. That's why there are conversion kits to put GM transmissions in Mustangs, and no coversion kits to put Ford transmissions in F-cars (or anything else...)
http://www.advanceadapters.com/acrobat/ford.pdf
#56 here:
http://www.transmissioncenter.net/AOD.htm
Re: SVT Lightning Cancelled - Big Rumor?
Originally Posted by scott9050
Adapters for a Ford tranny and GM engine:
http://www.advanceadapters.com/acrobat/ford.pdf
#56 here:
http://www.transmissioncenter.net/AOD.htm
http://www.advanceadapters.com/acrobat/ford.pdf
#56 here:
http://www.transmissioncenter.net/AOD.htm
The second link shows how to get rid of an AOD and replace it with a 700R4 in about 6 different applications, and then comes up with this gem:
"GM Automatic transmission to Ford small blocks: We offer an adapter plate and flywheel adapter to couple the GM automatics (TH350, TH400 & 700R4) to the stock Ford engine. This kit is 3/8" thick and provides an excellent way of combining the GM transmission into your Bronco. This kit has become very popular for the rock crawling enthusiast. It provides the ability to install the popular 700R transmission, which has a good reliable reputation and a great low 1st gear for an automatic."
So I was wrong... there actually ARE adaptors for mounting a GM engine to a Ford transmission... and they apparently sell at something like a rate of 1/3 to 1/6 the rate of the GM tranny to Ford engine conversions...
I wonder why that is...
PS - The 700R4 is a TH-350 with an extra gear slapped on and some electronic controls. The 4L60/65E series is an improved 700R4.
Last edited by PacerX; Oct 6, 2004 at 10:04 PM.
Re: SVT Lightning Cancelled - Big Rumor?
Originally Posted by PacerX
The second link shows how to get rid of an AOD and replace it with a 700R4 in about 6 different applications, and then comes up with this gem:
"GM Automatic transmission to Ford small blocks: We offer an adapter plate and flywheel adapter to couple the GM automatics (TH350, TH400 & 700R4) to the stock Ford engine. This kit is 3/8" thick and provides an excellent way of combining the GM transmission into your Bronco. This kit has become very popular for the rock crawling enthusiast. It provides the ability to install the popular 700R transmission, which has a good reliable reputation and a great low 1st gear for an automatic."
So I was wrong... there actually ARE adaptors for mounting a GM engine to a Ford transmission... and they apparently sell at something like a rate of 1/3 to 1/6 the rate of the GM tranny to Ford engine conversions...
I wonder why that is...
"#56AOD. Adapter to install a Ford AOD transmission on a Chevy Small Block motor. Cost $545.00"
They have this adapter because an upgraded AOD tranny is very strong. Lentech had AOD trannies capable of over 1200 hp and rock solid reliability. There is a low 9 second Camaro running a Lentech AOD tranny. My stock AOD lasted almost 200,000 miles and was still going strong when I rebuilt it with heavy duty Lentech components. Most AOD failures are due to line pressure issues due to a $.50 TV grommet which people fail to check (in stock applications). Higher HP levels tend to break the 2 piece input shaft, a piece very easily replaced with a 1 piece unit. The AOD can be very reliable in race applications, it just needs a few changes like any other tranny. And I will not get into the popularity of the C-4 in drag racing, or it's proven reliability in such applications.
Last edited by scott9050; Oct 6, 2004 at 10:19 PM.
Re: SVT Lightning Cancelled - Big Rumor?
Originally Posted by scott9050
You obviously missed the one I was referencing:
"#56AOD. Adapter to install a Ford AOD transmission on a Chevy Small Block motor. Cost $545.00"
"#56AOD. Adapter to install a Ford AOD transmission on a Chevy Small Block motor. Cost $545.00"
Look... face the music. The AOD was/is a garbage slushbox, just like the 10-bolt is a terrible rear end. You can spend lots of money trying to polish it into something it's not... or you can buy a TH-400 adapter and call it even.
For every Chevrolet converted to run an AOD, there are zillions more Fords converted to run a TH-350 or TH-400 or Powerglide or 700R4 or 4L60/65 or 4L80E.
Just admit it and let's move on.
Re: SVT Lightning Cancelled - Big Rumor?
Originally Posted by PacerX
Look... face the music. The AOD was/is a garbage slushbox, just like the 10-bolt is a terrible rear end. You can spend lots of money trying to polish it into something it's not... or you can buy a TH-400 adapter and call it even.
For every Chevrolet converted to run an AOD, there are zillions more Fords converted to run a TH-350 or TH-400 or Powerglide or 700R4 or 4L60/65 or 4L80E.
Just admit it and let's move on.
http://www.baumannengineering.com/aodecat.htm
http://www.lentechautomatics.com/
"In case you should have any doubt about the basic strength of the AOD, here’s a comparison of the FMX-based overdrive’s internals (on the right), with those of little-brother C4. This is not to knock the C4, which certainly has its place, but Bertrand feels the AOD has a much higher ultimate power-handling capability—mathematically as much as 2,000 hp—while offering the undeniable street benefit of a 0.67:1 Overdrive."
http://www.mustang50magazine.com/techarticles/81358/
Lentech also makes adapters to bolt an AOD to a GM or Chrysler engine:
http://www.lentechautomatics.com/aodhome.html
I can keep going on and on, but I will leave it at this.
Last edited by scott9050; Oct 6, 2004 at 10:42 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Sep 18, 2015 03:46 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Aug 3, 2015 02:40 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jul 29, 2015 08:10 PM



