States may get some say in emissions regulation
#16
Originally Posted by The article
Obama is also expected to order new guidelines on fuel economy. The law requires that by 2020, new cars and trucks meet a standard of 35 miles per gallon, a 40 percent increase over the status quo.
#17
In terms of Class 7/8 diesel emissions, the equipment takes up a LOT of space and has a dramatic effect on the cost of the truck.
Oh and we need diesels in cars. Like yesterday.
Note that hybrids top the chart. The Prius is 4 tons per year. So what we really need is more hybrids. Diesels will just be an expensive way to fail to meet the standard.
#18
Well the main problem is that if the engine runs lean, you have a surplus of oxygen in the exhaust, which makes the NOx reduction catalyst ineffective. Now you could use the same tricks they use in diesels to get around this (NOx trap + some sort of elimination procedure), but that's $$$. Gas mileage would probably increase a bit.
Well, the DPF is a big deal (in many ways) but in terms ofother systems (like urea injection) or excessive egr systems (Cat and Cummins have taken some different ideas on this). Either way, there is a lot of concern about which to do - as the Urea injection led to testing where mpg was better than the EGR systems, but it adds another fluid tank and everything associated with it.
And yes, we really need hybrids. But hybrids cant help everything (like class 7/8 trucks for example... but class 5 trucks can get a serious boost).
#19
Well, the DPF is a big deal (in many ways) but in terms ofother systems (like urea injection) or excessive egr systems (Cat and Cummins have taken some different ideas on this). Either way, there is a lot of concern about which to do - as the Urea injection led to testing where mpg was better than the EGR systems, but it adds another fluid tank and everything associated with it.
I know, but I think when push comes to shove, mpg will be the bigger draw than c02 (and I'm hoping it does, as diesels have some serious advantages and I'd hate to see them written off again!). While DI and VVT will get gasoline closer and closer, it'll never quite be the same.
And yes, we really need hybrids. But hybrids cant help everything (like class 7/8 trucks for example... but class 5 trucks can get a serious boost).
And yes, we really need hybrids. But hybrids cant help everything (like class 7/8 trucks for example... but class 5 trucks can get a serious boost).
So I think GM is making the right decision in avoiding diesel in favor of hybrids like the Volt, which will get a very low CO2 score in the EPA test, helping GM meet the California standards.
As an aside, there are a few southern California transit agencies that use gasoline hybrid bus power trains. Since you can no longer buy a new diesel down there, your choice is CNG or gasoline. If you don't have the expensive CNG refueling infrastructure (it needs more space too), you're down to a lack of choice -- gasoline.
#23
These kinds of laws are dumb. I mean for instance obeasity is a problem in the US. Well using the same logic as they keep applying to cars via CAFE....the way to fix it would be to make it so clothes manufacturers can only produce average and smaller sized clothing.
#24
Or like making stores and restaurants sell food such that overall calories from fat from all food sold is less than 30%. I.e. McDonalds has to sell a low fat turkey burger for every Big Mac. If people buy too many Big Macs and not enough Turkey burgers, McDonalds gets fined.
#25
CAFE is BS and should be done away with period. Stupid fools aim to regulate this industry right out of business...Get your American Muscle now, while you still can, cuz the writings on the wall folks!! The jig is up....
#26
1) I'd never trust a "turkey" burger from McDonalds.
2) I'd never eat one if they were forced to sell it .
I think the public actually *wants* more fuel efficient cars now. They just haven't learned how to avoid McDonald's and Burger King yet.
And outlawing "King Size" didn't solve anything. I've seen people go in and order a "Large" meal and then an extra order of fries.
The solution is for States and Cities to put in mass transit so people realize they don't need/want to drive everywhere. Cutting the emissions on NEW cars doesn't solve the millions of cars in LA. The old cars need to go.
And where there is no mass transit, people will drive as they have.
2) I'd never eat one if they were forced to sell it .
I think the public actually *wants* more fuel efficient cars now. They just haven't learned how to avoid McDonald's and Burger King yet.
And outlawing "King Size" didn't solve anything. I've seen people go in and order a "Large" meal and then an extra order of fries.
The solution is for States and Cities to put in mass transit so people realize they don't need/want to drive everywhere. Cutting the emissions on NEW cars doesn't solve the millions of cars in LA. The old cars need to go.
And where there is no mass transit, people will drive as they have.
#27
#28
Lets face it, we all know the solution is higher fuel prices. With higher fuel prices the public demands more efficient cars and uses mass transit.
If the public was given the choice of keeping CAFE or adding a $1-2 gallon revenue neutral gas tax what do you think they would choose?
#29
If it ever gets to the point that I can't buy a truck or large car; just to **** people off I have the skills to fix anything up.
I'll purchase a pre-emmission truck and throw a big *** 454 in it. I'll also get me a land-barge pre-emmission caddy and throw a 6.5 Turbo DIESEL in the bastard.
And spew black *** smoke as far as the eye can see, because I can, and because I think laws like this are insane.
I'll purchase a pre-emmission truck and throw a big *** 454 in it. I'll also get me a land-barge pre-emmission caddy and throw a 6.5 Turbo DIESEL in the bastard.
And spew black *** smoke as far as the eye can see, because I can, and because I think laws like this are insane.