Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Starting prices for Chrysler 300 & Dodge Magnum

Old Jan 20, 2004 | 10:52 AM
  #1  
guionM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Thumbs up Starting prices for Chrysler 300 & Dodge Magnum

Starting price for the Dodge Magnum, including destination charges will be $22,495 (Magnum SE). Goes on sale in May.

Chrysler 300 will be starting at $23,595 and will be out in April.

These prices are for the base 2.7 V6.
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 11:07 AM
  #2  
SNEAKY NEIL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,072
From: Lilburn, GA, USA
Not too bad. I guess these are changing markets a bit. The Magnum replaces the Intrepid but seems to be more pricey so I guess it is trying to move upscale. Same goes for the 300C that replaces the Concord, but doesn't it also replace the 300M as well. If that is the case then I guess they are trying to fall somewhere in between the 300M and the Concord.
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 11:09 AM
  #3  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
My biggest concern for Dodge is... can they really expect to retain all the sedan sales that Interpid generated... with only a wagon ??
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 12:10 PM
  #4  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally posted by Darth Xed
My biggest concern for Dodge is... can they really expect to retain all the sedan sales that Interpid generated... with only a wagon ??
That is the same thing that I thought. I would except the Magnum to be bought by people that are looking for something sportier than a minivan and that still has a lot of utility. I think Dodge still needs a Sedan built off that platform.
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 12:13 PM
  #5  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Originally posted by Z28x
That is the same thing that I thought. I would except the Magnum to be bought by people that are looking for something sportier than a minivan and that still has a lot of utility. I think Dodge still needs a Sedan built off that platform.
I totally agree..

Maybe they are assuming (or hoping) that sedan buyers will shift over to Chrysler brand and buy the 300C...??
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 06:26 PM
  #6  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
I kinda liked the Magnum at NAIAS, and I'm not really a wagon kind of guy. Much nicer than the old-man 300. The thing about both of these cars is that I think many people will have to have the Hemi....both of them are HUGE vehicles and will have a hard time getting out of their own way with the tepid 2.7. Guess that just means more profits for Chrysler, which was probably the point.
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 12:52 AM
  #7  
mastrdrver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,817
From: O-Town
I think these cars would have been better off if they had the 3.5 as the base and used the 4.7 in the SXT models. I think it would make the cars a lot more attractive. You could have a 4.7 Magnum for under $28000!
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 02:19 AM
  #8  
KLee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 370
From: Honolulu, Hi USA
I may have to sell the truck and get a 300C!
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 11:33 AM
  #9  
Aeromaks's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 745
From: New Jersey
And why have the 4.7 magnum for 28.9 when you can have the 5.7 for 29? before rebates!
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 12:27 PM
  #10  
Eric77TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,958
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally posted by Darth Xed
My biggest concern for Dodge is... can they really expect to retain all the sedan sales that Interpid generated... with only a wagon ??
Darth, or anybody, know if there are still any rumors swirling about a Dodge Charger? Perhaps the later addition of a Charger would provide more volume for Dodge on this platform, but I'm with you and Z28x. I think a Magnum sedan would be a good idea (though I really like the wagon, actually). Dodge and Chrysler have, at least to me, very different images and I'm not sure you're going to convince someone who wants a Dodge R/T that a Chrysler 300C is the "same thing" regardless of identical platform, powertrains, etc.
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 12:31 PM
  #11  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Originally posted by Eric77TA
Darth, or anybody, know if there are still any rumors swirling about a Dodge Charger? Perhaps the later addition of a Charger would provide more volume for Dodge on this platform, but I'm with you and Z28x. I think a Magnum sedan would be a good idea (though I really like the wagon, actually). Dodge and Chrysler have, at least to me, very different images and I'm not sure you're going to convince someone who wants a Dodge R/T that a Chrysler 300C is the "same thing" regardless of identical platform, powertrains, etc.
I don't get tons of good D/C info, but from what I understand, Charger has been one of those "on again/off again" projects... from what I have heard, it's story really seems to parallel that of the C5 if you've ever read "All Corvettes Are Red", but that is just an outsider's guess.

GuionM might be the best to give us an update on Charger... he seems to have some good D/C contacts!
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 09:04 AM
  #12  
Eliminator's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 943
Yup gonna trade in the mini-van and get me one of those Magnums I heard you can get them in April in Wis. Can you say Hemi
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 10:22 AM
  #13  
ZWILD1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 93
Direct from the Dodge website:

------------------------------------MSRP---Destination
Dodge Magnum SE--- 2.7L V6- $21,870- $625
Dodge Magnum SXT-- 3.5L V6- $25,370- $625
Dodge Magnum RT--- 5.7L V8- $29,370- $625
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 10:51 AM
  #14  
muckz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
2.7 - that engine shouldn't go into anything larger than the current Avenger/Sebring. MT estimates 0-60 in mid 10's - that's 17 second 1/4 mi.
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 06:04 PM
  #15  
mastrdrver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,817
From: O-Town
Even though the 2.7 is not the best engine to put in those cars, it won't be that bad with the 5sp that is behind it. It will still be a dog, but I don't think it will be as bad as some people thing. Maybe if they don't sell very many they will think about droping it and putting the 4.7 in the cars.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 PM.