Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

SSr......pull the plug?

Old Sep 20, 2002 | 09:28 AM
  #1  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
SSr......pull the plug?

The SSr.

It doesn't look anywhere near as cool as the concept did, it's going to weigh more than anyone expected, it's going to be really slow and be very expensive.

Not to go out on a limb, but who thinks that Chevy should pull the plug on this one?
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 09:41 AM
  #2  
slt's Avatar
slt
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,024
I think most would say that Chevy should have never "plugged in" this vehical. I wouldn't be upset to see it go.
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 09:47 AM
  #3  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
I doubt they can pull it even if they wanted to now...

They've been talking about it so long, if it never same out, it'd be a joke.

but... I never really liked the concept or the looks of this car... not my thing.
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 10:53 AM
  #4  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
When I said I was disappointed with the production SSR, I didn't want to make it sound like Chevy should pull the plug. It is still going to sell well (for their expectations and what it is) and it still stands out in a crowd, even with the toned-down styling. I still think it serves a good purpose in the Chevy lineup amidst the cookie-cutter Impala, Malibu, etc. I just wish it was better.
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 12:25 PM
  #5  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
It's going to be such a limited production vehicle, it doesn't matter one way or another. It's actually going to make GTO look like a high volume car.
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 12:30 PM
  #6  
luis nunez's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 538
Anyone has a pic of what the SSR is going to be now?
I saw it, and ?I like it, but is slower that I was expectig:
any pic>
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 07:06 PM
  #7  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
I have a couple of pictures on my website from last year's NAIAS:

www.cs.wayne.edu/~mwilson/SSR1.jpg
www.cs.wayne.edu/~mwilson/SSR2.jpg

EDIT: This is the production version btw.
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 08:22 PM
  #8  
phantasm99's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 172
Instead of making a low volume SSR and a low volume GTO.....
How about making one high volume F-Body!!!
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 11:12 PM
  #9  
IZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,647
From: At car shows and cruise nights!
IMO they shouldn't make it. Its another stupid looking car that probably will not sell or will not sell after a while.

And I agree with the previous post!! Thats what they SHOULD do.
Old Sep 21, 2002 | 10:31 AM
  #10  
slt's Avatar
slt
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,024
Originally posted by IZ28
And I agree with the previous post!! Thats what they SHOULD do.
I second that
Old Sep 21, 2002 | 12:23 PM
  #11  
DaxsZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 503
From: Big Orange Country!
GM will probably sell more than there estimates (which I heard is low) and make alot of money on it. Then they will say they are glad they made it rather than the F-body!
Old Sep 21, 2002 | 01:35 PM
  #12  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Question

Just remembered, wasn't the reason for SSR's existence besides, a styling demonstration, to give GM a bit of experience in producing a profitable low volume niche vehicle, much like Chrysler has learned how to do?
Old Sep 21, 2002 | 03:17 PM
  #13  
jrp4uc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,724
From: Hebron, KY
Cool

Originally posted by Z28Wilson
I have a couple of pictures on my website from last year's NAIAS:

www.cs.wayne.edu/~mwilson/SSR1.jpg
www.cs.wayne.edu/~mwilson/SSR2.jpg

EDIT: This is the production version btw.
Nope, this is the concept version (which everyone seems to like so much).

This gallery has pics of both. The one with the mirrors on top of the windshield is the concept. I really don't see a big difference. And no, even though the numbers aren't what we'd hoped for, GM should not pull the plug on it. Even the Prowler was a neat car and it was no hotrod.

Last edited by jrp4uc; Sep 21, 2002 at 03:27 PM.
Old Sep 21, 2002 | 09:58 PM
  #14  
General Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 441
Yes, pull the plug. It has been around at the shows and Woodward for so long, it is a joke. It makes GM look like total idiots that it woudl take that long to actually get a limited edition vehice from concept to production.

Also, the styling, is over. It had its run. Retro is over. PT Cruiser, Prowler, Thunderbird. Retro is over, and GM never even joined the party.

Yes, please pull the plug on the joke.
Old Sep 22, 2002 | 12:21 AM
  #15  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by jrp4uc
Nope, this is the concept version (which everyone seems to like so much).

This gallery has pics of both. The one with the mirrors on top of the windshield is the concept. I really don't see a big difference. And no, even though the numbers aren't what we'd hoped for, GM should not pull the plug on it. Even the Prowler was a neat car and it was no hotrod.
Yes, that is a pic of the concept.

These are some of the changes in the production model....no V-butted windshield, C5 mirrors replace those neat billet ones mounted on top of the windshield, the wheels lose there negative (and cool looking) offset.

Also the concept was based off of the old S-10. The production version has longer overall length, shorter wheelbase and longer overhangs.

Put all these changes together...and the production SSR comes up short when compared to the concept.

But, I'm sure that they will pre-sell everyone that they make.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:16 PM.